Won-Gyu Yoo1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inje University and Elderly Life Redesign Institute.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the isolation ratios of scapular retraction muscles between protracted scapular and asymptomatic groups. [Subjects] Seven males with protracted scapular and seven asymptomatic males aged 20-30 years were recruited. [Methods] We measeured the rhomboid, middle trapezius (MT), and lower trapezius (LT) muscles activities, and calculated the isolation ratio. [Results] The rhomboid and MT isolation ratio of the protracted scapular group was not significantly different from that of the asymptomatic group. The LT isolation ratio of the protracted scapular group was significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic group. [Conclusion] We suggest that a proper retraction exercise, for patients with protracted scapular posture is one that includes exercises for selectively strengthening the lower trapezius muscle.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the isolation ratios of scapular retraction muscles between protracted scapular and asymptomatic groups. [Subjects] Seven males with protracted scapular and seven asymptomatic males aged 20-30 years were recruited. [Methods] We measeured the rhomboid, middle trapezius (MT), and lower trapezius (LT) muscles activities, and calculated the isolation ratio. [Results] The rhomboid and MT isolation ratio of the protracted scapular group was not significantly different from that of the asymptomatic group. The LT isolation ratio of the protracted scapular group was significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic group. [Conclusion] We suggest that a proper retraction exercise, for patients with protracted scapular posture is one that includes exercises for selectively strengthening the lower trapezius muscle.
In rehabilitation, the scapular orientation is one of the major factors utilized in
normalizing scapulohumoral rhythm1). The
shoulder muscles contribute to scapular upward rotation, external roation and the posterior
tilt of the acromioclavicular joint, and substantial protraction of the clavicle at the
sternoclavicular joint2). Scapualr
protraction is not only a movement of anterior translation of the acromioclavicular
joint3). Accordingly, some clinicians
suggest the necessity of a proper retraction exercise for patients with a protracted
scapular posture4). Retractors of the
scapulothoracic joint consist of the middle trapezius, rhomboids and lower trapezius5). These muscles are particularly active
during pulling movements of the arms. The middle trapezius functions as the primary muscle,
and the rhomboids and lower trapezius have secondary roles5). The isolated contraction ratio is calculated as the ratio of
co-activatied muscles6). In the present
study, the isolated contraction ratio was calculated using the following formula: Isolation
ratio = [Muscle A or B or C / (Muscle A + Muscle B + Muscle C)] × 100%. The isolated
contraction ratio indicates the proportional contribution of a muscle to a motion. This
study compared the isolation ratios of the scapular retraction muscles between protracted
scapular and asymptomatic groups.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
We performed an evaluation for protracted scapular when we recruited the subjects. A
palpation meter (PALM; Performance Attainment Associates, St. Paul, MN, USA) was used to
measure the distance between two bony landmarks of the body. We measured the horizontal
distance between the scapula medial border and the spine in the scapular resting
position7). This procedure was repeated 3
times, and the average of the measurements was used. Normally, the scapular resting position
is the position on the posterior thorax approximately 2 inches from midline2). In this study, we determined the protracted
shoulders as a distance of more than 9 cm from the spine and a distance of between 5–7 cm
was considered an asymptomatic sign. Seven asymptomatic males aged 20–30 years with a mean
height and weight of 173.2 ± 3.3 cm and 67.1 ± 4.0 kg, respectively, participated in this
study. Seven males with protracted scapular aged 20–30 years with a mean height and weight
of 174.1 ± 2.6 cm and 65.2 ± 5.3 kg, respectively, participated in this study. None of the
subjects had a history of musculoskeletal disorders or pain associated with the upper
extremity in the past 6 months. EMG data of the rhomboid, middle trapezius (MT), and lower
trapezius (LT) muscles activities were collected using a Biopac MP100WSW (Biopac System,
Santa Barbara, CA, USA) data acquisition system. All EMG signals were sampled at 1,000 Hz,
and the root mean square values were calculated. The amplitude was normalized to the maximum
voluntary isometric contraction. The isolated contraction ratio was calculated using the
normalized data of the three scapular retractor muscles activities. Each scapular retractor
muscle's isolation ratio was calculated using the following formula6): isolation ratio (%) = rhomboid or MT or LT / (rhomboid + MT
+ LT) × 100%. All subjects performed a scapular retraction exercise using tubing band with
their elbows at their sides and bent to 90 degrees. They pulled the band back to move their
shoulder blades toward each other, then returned to the starting position. One trial was
performed for each test. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL,
USA) was used for the statistical analysis. The independent t-test was performed to analyze
the significance of differences between the groups. The level for statistical significance,
α, was chosen as 0.05.
RESULTS
The rhomboid isolation ratio of the protracted scapular group (40.6 ± 6.2%) was not
significantly different from that of the asymptomatic group (37.0 ± 5.7%) (p>0.05). The
MT isolation ratio of protracted scapular group (36.8 ± 8.3%) was not significantly
different from that of the asymptomatic group (34.2 ± 6.4%) (p>0.05). The LT isolation
ratio of protracted scapular group (22.4 ± 5.7%) was significantly lower than that of the
asymptomatic group (28.6 ± 5.1%) (p<0.05).
DISCUSSION
The middle trapezius functions as the primary muscle, and the rhomboids and lower trapezius
function as secondary muscles during scapular retraction movements5). MT has a proper line force to retract the scapular. The
scapular elevation is controlled by the LT and scapular depression is controlled by the
rhomboid5). The isolated contraction
ratio indicates the relative proportion of a muscle's role during a motion. Our results show
that the rhomboid and MT isolation ratios of the protracted scapular group were not
significantly different from those of the asymptomatic group. The LT isolation ratio of the
protracted scapular group was significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic group.
Weakness of the LT or rhomboids significantly reduces the retraction of the scapular5). Weakness of the lower trapezius causes poor
scapular orientation and instability, and is attributed to pathologic kinematics such as
impingement8). A recent study reported
that postural correction of the scapula was closely associated with activation of the lower
trapezius in neck pain patients9). Several
researchers have proposed activating the lower trapezius, to restore normal scapulothoracic
and glenohumeral joints movements6, 10). Postural correlates have been described
without quantitative verification. For example, a forward head tilt or forward shoulders are
related to an extended upper cervical spine, or to protracted scapular and a kyphotic
thoracic spine11). Clinicians commonly
apply a simple scapular retraction exercise, such as pulling a band back to move the
shoulder blades together, with the elbows at the sides and bent at 90 degrees, for scapular
protraction posture. However, we suggest that a proper retraction exercise for patients with
protracted scapular posture requires an exercise selectively strengthening the lower
trapezius muscle.
Authors: Kristof De Mey; Lieven Danneels; Barbara Cagnie; Lotte Van den Bosch; Johan Flier; Ann M Cools Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Bruno R da Costa; Susan Armijo-Olivo; Inae Gadotti; Sharon Warren; David C Reid; David J Magee Journal: Physiotherapy Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 3.358