[Purpose] The objective of this study was to propose a work environment that could reduce musculoskeletal workload. Accordingly, spinal muscle fatigue caused by ultrasound therapy at various treatment table heights was examined and compared. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-five healthy subjects participated in this experiment. The table height was set to 100%, 125%, and 150% of the stool height (45 cm). The electromyographic signals of the erector spinae at the thoracic (T10, T12) and lumbar (L2, L4) levels were collected by an electromyography (EMG) system during the performance of ultrasound therapy. The median frequencies were then calculated and compared. [Results] The lower the table height was, the smaller the median frequencies of thoracic and lumbar erector spinae on both sides were. The T10 and T12 levels on both sides and the left L2 region showed significant differences among the table heights. At every spinal level, the median frequency of the left erector spinae was lower than that of the right: T10, T12, L2, and L4 at 100%, L4 at 125%, and T10, T12, L2, and L4 at 150% showed significant differences. [Conclusion] During ultrasound therapy muscle fatigue increased at higher table heights and the muscle fatigue of the left erector spinae was greater than that of the right side. To reduce muscle fatigue, we recommend the table height work is raised to an appropriate height, and that is shared between left and right arms.
[Purpose] The objective of this study was to propose a work environment that could reduce musculoskeletal workload. Accordingly, spinal muscle fatigue caused by ultrasound therapy at various treatment table heights was examined and compared. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-five healthy subjects participated in this experiment. The table height was set to 100%, 125%, and 150% of the stool height (45 cm). The electromyographic signals of the erector spinae at the thoracic (T10, T12) and lumbar (L2, L4) levels were collected by an electromyography (EMG) system during the performance of ultrasound therapy. The median frequencies were then calculated and compared. [Results] The lower the table height was, the smaller the median frequencies of thoracic and lumbar erector spinae on both sides were. The T10 and T12 levels on both sides and the left L2 region showed significant differences among the table heights. At every spinal level, the median frequency of the left erector spinae was lower than that of the right: T10, T12, L2, and L4 at 100%, L4 at 125%, and T10, T12, L2, and L4 at 150% showed significant differences. [Conclusion] During ultrasound therapy muscle fatigue increased at higher table heights and the muscle fatigue of the left erector spinae was greater than that of the right side. To reduce muscle fatigue, we recommend the table height work is raised to an appropriate height, and that is shared between left and right arms.
In their work with patients, 79.9% of physical therapists are exposed to work-related
musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Most pains occur in the shoulder, neck, spine, and the
extremities. In particular, back pain is experienced by at least 82% of physical
therapists1).Besides work overload, WMSDs can be also caused by using muscles for a long time with no
rest or by too many repeated muscle contractions2). Long-term maintenance of the same posture or repeated performance
of the same motion is highly correlated with pain. Musculoskeletal pain can also result when
muscle contraction is continuously maintained or the muscle is repeatedly contracted without
sufficient rest3).In ultrasound therapy (UT), the upper extremities are moved repeatedly while a fixed
posture of the trunk is maintained. On average, a physical therapist repeatedly performs UT
several tens of times per day, for at least five minutes per session. Therefore, the
performance of UT is likely to contribute to the development of musculoskeletal pain in the
upper extremities and spine.The continuous contraction of spinal muscles causes muscle fatigue, which may increase the
prevalence of disc disease; therefore, efforts should be made to reduce the workload on the
spine4). Table height is an important
factor in determining workload5).
Inappropriate table height is an important cause of spinal pain because it induces high
muscle contraction and causes spinal pain6). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the muscle activities of the
spine during the performance of UT and propose a table height that reduces the
musculoskeletal burden.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The subjects of this study were 25 healthy adult males with no history of musculoskeletal
or neurological diseases. The experimental process was sufficiently explained to each of the
25 subjects, who all gave their written prior consent. The mean age, mean height, and mean
weight of the subjects were 20.8 ± 1.2 years, 165 ± 5.1 cm, and 61.9 ± 10.3 kg,
respectively.To evaluate the muscle fatigue caused by UT, electromyographic signals were collected at a
sampling rate of 1,000 Hz by the LAX3204 electromyography system (LAXTHA, Korea). The median
frequencies were calculated using Telescan software (LAXTHA, Korea) after processing with a
50–500 Hz band pass filter and a 60 Hz notch filter. The measured muscles were the erector
spinae (ES) on both sides of the thoracic (T10, T12) and lumbar (L2, L4) spine. A stool
45 cm high with wheels and no back support was used. The height of the treatment table was
set to 100%, 125%, and 150% of the stool height. The stool was positioned to give a distance
of 1 cm between the knee and the treatment table when a subject sat on it. The ultrasound
transducer used in this study was based on cylindricality device (Sonopuls 190,
Enraf-Nonius, Germany). To reproduce the same transducer motion, an air disc (Dynair
Balkissen, TOGU, Germany) 33 cm in diameter and 9 cm high was moved at a constant speed
along a circular guideline indicated at 12 cm from the center of the air disc. The air disc
was placed at the edge of the table. Subjects performed UT for one minute while holding the
ultrasound transducer with their right hand. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were
conducted using SPSS 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, USA) to analyze the significance of differences in
the median frequency among the table heights. The significance level was 0.05.All data represent the Mean ± SE. Values with the same letter are significantly
different (p<0.05) by Tukey's testAll data represent the Mean ± SE
RESULTS
The median frequencies of the erector spinae (ES) in the T10 and T12 levels on both sides
and at the left L2 level were the lowest at 100% and the highest at 150%. The post-hoc test
showed a significant difference between 100% and 150%. The median frequencies of ES at the
right L2 level and the L4 level on both sides were also the lowest at 100% and the highest
at 150%. However, there were no significant differences among the median frequencies at
100%, 125%, and 150% (Table 1). At 100% and
150%, the median frequency of the left ES was significantly lower than that of the right ES
at every spinal level. At 125%, the median frequency of the left ES was also lower than that
of the right ES at every spinal level, but only the difference at the L4 level was
significant (Table 2).
Table 1.
Differences in median frequency among the different table heights
Level
100%
125%
150%
T10 Left*
121.2±4.5a
129.8±6.8ab
151.5±10b
T10 Right*
149.6±9.9a
157.7±11.3ab
187±11.6b
T12 Left*
124.7±5.6a
129.9±5.9ab
156.1±9.9b
T12 Right*
132.5±9.1a
144.9±9.9ab
178.5±12b
L2 Left*
126.2±6.2a
129.5±5.9ab
158±11.6b
L2 Right
136.1±10.8
142.3±10.8
174.3±13
L4 Left
138.6±8
150.5±8.5
166.7±11.3
L4 Right
140.6±11.1
152.2±11.7
173.2±12.7
All data represent the Mean ± SE. Values with the same letter are significantly
different (p<0.05) by Tukey's test
Table 2.
Differences in median frequency between left and right muscles
Table Height
Level
L
R
100%
T10*
121.2±4.5
149.6±9.9
T12*
124.7±5.6
132.5±9.1
L2*
126.2±6.2
136.1±10.8
L4*
138.6±8.0
140.6±11.1
125%
T10
129.8±6.8
157.7±11.3
T12
129.9±5.9
144.9±9.9
L2
129.5±5.9
142.3±10.8
L4*
150.5±8.5
152.2±11.7
150%
T10*
151.5±10.0
187.0±11.6
T12
156.1±9.9
178.5±12.0
L2*
158.0±11.6
174.3±13.0
L4*
166.7±11.3
173.2±12.7
All data represent the Mean ± SE
DISSCUSSION
The back muscles of the trunk perform appropriate postural adjustments in the voluntary
movement of the trunk or body segment. The proprioceptive senses generated from repeated
movements of the hand are conveyed to the α-motor neurons of the ES, and the back muscle is
activated in response to the hand movements7). UT work consists of the repeated movements of the upper extremities
and hands. In this study, the median frequencies of ES at both sides were observed at all
levels. UT work repeated for one minute seems to have caused a load on the back muscle. In
particular, the muscle fatigue of the left ES was a little higher, which seems to because of
its role in stabilization when the right upper extremity is used. Therefore, unilateral
muscle fatigue could be prevented if UT work were performed alternately by for the left and
right upper extremities.UT is low-intensity work characterized by repeated movements of the upper extremities in a
specific posture. Although it is generally assumed that WMSDs are accompanied by
high-intensity muscle contractions, they can also be generated by low-intensity muscle
contractions. Sustained muscle contraction at 8% of the maximal voluntary contraction is
sufficient to cause pain8). Because
sustained muscle contraction decreases the tension generating ability of the muscle,
additional motor units must be activated. The metabolic waste thus generated is not removed
by normal blood circulation because the increased muscle contraction resulting from the
increased motor unit activation interferes with blood circulation. Cumulative metabolic
wastes can cause muscle pain creating a pain-spasm cycle9, 10). A survey revealed
discomfort of the shoulder and back muscles is caused by upper extremity work11). A decrease in the median frequency of the
ES caused by UT work was observed in this study. In particular, the lower the table height
was, the lower the median frequency became. Consequently, we believe repetitive performance
of UT at a low table height contributes to WMSDs by increasing muscle fatigue of ES.
Maintaining a correct posture is essential for reducing musculoskeletal pain and fatigue.
Poor working posture can cause musculoskeletal or nervous diseases by accumulating stress in
the body. Furthermore, even physiologically normal people can experience pain and fatigue
caused by musculoskeletal burden if they perform repetitive movements12).Table height is a critical factor in the maintenance of a correct posture in UT work. In
this study, therefore, a wheeled stool 45 cm in height was used to reproduce the clinical
setting. The table height was set to 100%, 125%, and 150% of the height of the stool, 45 cm,
56.2 cm, and 67.5 cm, respectively. This study conducted a quantitative analysis with an
electromyographic system. The results show that the median frequencies of the ES on both
sides at the T10 and T2 levels significantly decreased at lower table heights. These results
suggest that performing UT at inappropriate table heights increases the fatigue of the
thoracic back muscles. Although the differences were not statistically significant, the
median frequencies of ES at the L2 and L4 levels also decreased at the lower table heights,
also suggesting fatigue of the lumbar muscles. We believe the reason for these changes in
median frequency with table height is the increasing moment applied to the spinal segment at
the lower table height. Therefore, the height of the treatment table should be raised
appropriately in order to prevent fatigue of ES caused by repetitive performance of UT.