| Literature DB >> 24259853 |
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pelvic adjustment via the Gonstead Technique on the posture of female university students. [Subjects] The subjects of this study were 30 female university students who were equally and randomly allocated to a pelvic adjustment group, an experimental group, and a stretching group, a control group. [Methods] Using BackMapper, their trunk inclination (TIN), trunk imbalance (TIM), pelvic position (PPO), pelvic torsion (PTO), pelvic rotation (PRO), and position of their scapulae (PSA) were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Pelvic adjustment; Posture; Stretching
Year: 2013 PMID: 24259853 PMCID: PMC3820405 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Comparison of TIN, TIM, PPO, PTO, PRO, and PSA between before and after intervention in each group (mean ± SD) (units: TIN, TIM, PPO, PTO, and PRO degree, PSA-mm)
| Category | Group | Before intervention | After intervention |
| TIN | Adjustment group | 2.4±1.9 | 1.2±0.9 |
| Stretching group | 2.5±1.3 | 2.3±1.4 | |
| TIM | Adjustment group* | 2.7±2.6 | 1.1±0.8 |
| Stretching group | 2.5±1.5 | 2.7±1.6 | |
| PPO | Adjustment group* | 2.5±1.5 | 1.1±0.8 |
| Stretching group | 2.7±1.8 | 2.8±1.7 | |
| PTO | Adjustment group* | 3.6±2.4 | 1.1±0.3 |
| Stretching group | 3.2±2.9 | 3.4±2.6 | |
| PRO | Adjustment group | 2.5±2.3 | 1.4±0.7 |
| Stretching group | 2.5±2.0 | 2.3±2.2 | |
| PSA | Adjustment group* | 5.5±3.8 | 2.8±1.4 |
| Stretching group | 5.1±3.4 | 4.7±3.1 |
*p<0.05; TIN, trunk inclination; TIM, trunk imbalance; PPO, pelvic position; PTO, pelvic torsion; PRO, pelvic rotation; PSA, position of scapulae
Comparison of TIN, TIM, PPO, PTO, PRO and PSA between the adjustment group and stretching group (mean ± SD) (units: TIN, TIM, PPO, PTO, and PRO degree, PSA-mm)
| Category | Adjustment group | Stretching group | |
| Before intervention | TIN | 2.4±1.9 | 2.5±1.3 |
| TIM | 2.7±2.6 | 2.5±1.5 | |
| PPO | 2.5±1.5 | 2.7±1.8 | |
| PTO | 3.6±2.4 | 3.2±2.9 | |
| PRO | 2.5±2.3 | 2.5±2.0 | |
| PSA | 5.5±3.8 | 5.1±3.4 | |
| After intervention | TIN* | 1.2±0.9 | 2.3±1.4 |
| TIM* | 1.1±0.8 | 2.7±1.6 | |
| PPO* | 1.1±0.8 | 2.8±1.7 | |
| PTO* | 1.1±0.3 | 3.4±2.6 | |
| PRO | 1.4±0.7 | 2.3±2.2 | |
| PSA* | 2.8±1.4 | 4.7±3.1 | |
| Change between before and | TIN | 1.1±2.2 | 0.2±2.1 |
| TIM* | 1.5±2.4 | −0.1±1.3 | |
| PPO* | 1.3±1.7 | −0.1±2.1 | |
| PTO* | 2.4±2.5 | −0.1±4.9 | |
| PRO | 2.7±3.5 | 0.3±5.0 | |
| PSA | 1.0±2.6 | 0.2±2.7 |
*p<0.05