| Literature DB >> 24259847 |
Chaegil Lim1, Yongnam Park, Youngsook Bae.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of Kinesio taping and spiral taping on menstrual pain and premenstrual syndrome, to investigate the efficacy of the two types of taping as methods for alleviating menstrual pain and premenstrual syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: Kinesio taping; Menstrual pain; Spiral taping
Year: 2013 PMID: 24259847 PMCID: PMC3820414 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Characteristics of subjects
| Kinesio taping | Spiral taping | Control group | |
| Age (year)Weight (kg) | 22.6±1.5 | 23.6±2.9 | 21.9±0.8 |
| 53.7±4.9 | 56.2±2.9 | 53.0±2.7 | |
| Height (cm) | 160.2±5.0 | 161.3±6.1 | 161.0±6.5 |
| Menarcheal age (year) | 11.4±2.2 | 12.2±1.4 | 11.2±3.8 |
| Menstrual Duration (day) | 4.8±1.9 | 5.3±0.9 | 5.1±1.1 |
| Menstrual interval (day) | 28.2±4.0 | 27.9±3.7 | 29.8±8.6 |
Fig. 1.Kinesio taping method
Fig. 2.Spiral taping method. A: the tender points on the biceps brachii tendon on the medial side, B: the subjects' tender points on the biceps brachii tendon on the lateral side
Comparison of menstrual pain and premenstrual syndrome between inter- group, intra-group between before and after
| Group | before | After | ||
| Menstrual pain | 1 | 7.4±1.5 | 3.3±3.0**+ ++ | |
| 2 | 7.4±1.6 | 5.8±1.9*+ | ||
| 3 | 8.5±1.4 | 8.3±1.2 | ||
| Premenstral syndrome | low backpain | 1 | 2.5±1.3 | 2.0±1.3 |
| 2 | 3.0±1.6 | 2.1±1.3 | ||
| 3 | 3.9±1.6 | 3.6±1.0 | ||
| headaches | 1 | 2.0±1.3 | 1.6±1.1 | |
| 2 | 2.0±1.4 | 1.5±0.7 | ||
| 3 | 2.9±1.8 | 2.6±1.6 | ||
| breasttenderness | 1 | 3.0±1.3 | 2.1±1.6 | |
| 2 | 2.5±1.2 | 1.7±1.3* | ||
| 3 | 2.5±1.6 | 2.4±1.1 | ||
| tension oranxiety | 1 | 3.1±1.4 | 2.3±1.3 | |
| 2 | 3.0±1.2 | 2.0±1.0* | ||
| 3 | 3.0±1.3 | 2.8±1.2 | ||
| decreased activities | 1 | 2.5±1.4 | 2.0±1.5 | |
| 2 | 2.4±1.3 | 1.4±0.5* | ||
| 3 | 2.4±1.2 | 2.3±1.0 | ||
1: Kinesio taping, 2: spiral taping, 3: control group. *p<0.05 compared to the value before treatment; **p<0.01 compared to the value before treatment; +p<0.05 compared to the value of the control group. ++p<0.05 compared to the value of the spiral taping group