Literature DB >> 24259624

Measuring dabigatran concentrations using a chromogenic ecarin clotting time assay.

Robert C Gosselin1, Denis M Dwyre, William E Dager.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians managing patients receiving the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran may benefit in being able to determine the amount of drug present in selected situations. This may include assessment of accumulation, concurrent drug interactions, or adequate removal from circulation. The ability to estimate the amount of dabigatran present using the chromogenic ecarin assay (ECA) requires further clarification.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the reliability of dabigatran measurements using a chromogenic ECA.
METHODS: This was an evaluation of the ECA method that incorporated assessment of imprecision, linearity, accuracy, carryover, and lower limits of detection or blank. Pooled normal plasma enriched with dabigatran at concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ng/mL were sent blinded to 3 laboratories in the United States to compare our ECA results with those of laboratories reporting dilute thrombin time methods (HEMOCLOT thrombin inhibitor assay) for measuring dabigatran. Trough and peak levels from 35 patients were also compared with mass spectrophotometry for assessing ECA accuracy.
RESULTS: The within-run or day-to-day imprecision was less than 10%, with high linearity (R (2) = 0.989) and high degree of accuracy (R (2) = 0.985; slope = 0.908) for levels ranging between 18 and 470 ng/mL and no carryover at 0 ng/mL noted. The ECA approach appeared to be more reliable at lower dabigatran concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The chromogenic ECA appears to be an effective approach to determine the amount of dabigatran present. Further insights are necessary to determine how it can be used to reduce thromboembolic or bleeding complications in patients receiving dabigatran.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromogenic ecarin assay; dabigatran; laboratory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259624     DOI: 10.1177/1060028013509074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  8 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker; Deborah M Siegal; Mark Crowther; David A Garcia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Evaluation of dabigatran for appropriateness of use and bleeding events in a community hospital setting.

Authors:  Anastasia L Armbruster; Katie S Buehler; Sun H Min; Margaret Riley; Michael W Daly
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-10

Review 3.  Measurement and reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4.  Laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant activity of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Adam Cuker; Deborah M Siegal; Mark A Crowther; David A Garcia
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants: Accurate Measurement of Plasma Drug Concentrations.

Authors:  Jonathan Douxfils; Helen Mani; Valentine Minet; Bérangère Devalet; Bernard Chatelain; Jean-Michel Dogné; François Mullier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Measurement of non-VKA oral anticoagulants versus classic ones: the appropriate use of hemostasis assays.

Authors:  Jonathan Douxfils; Anne Tamigniau; Bernard Chatelain; Catherine Goffinet; Jean-Michel Dogné; François Mullier
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-04

Review 7.  Dental management of patients taking novel oral anticoagulants (NOAs): Dabigatran.

Authors:  Adrian Curto; Alberto Albaladejo; Alfonso Alvarado
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 8.  Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Practical Considerations for Emergency Medicine Physicians.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Zubaid Rafique; Adam J Singer
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 1.112

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.