Literature DB >> 24259373

Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle.

Luis E Moraes1, Anders B Strathe, James G Fadel, David P Casper, Ermias Kebreab.   

Abstract

Agriculture has a key role in food production worldwide and it is a major component of the gross domestic product of several countries. Livestock production is essential for the generation of high quality protein foods and the delivery of foods in regions where animal products are the main food source. Environmental impacts of livestock production have been examined for decades, but recently emission of methane from enteric fermentation has been targeted as a substantial greenhouse gas source. The quantification of methane emissions from livestock on a global scale relies on prediction models because measurements require specialized equipment and may be expensive. The predictive ability of current methane emission models remains poor. Moreover, the availability of information on livestock production systems has increased substantially over the years enabling the development of more detailed methane prediction models. In this study, we have developed and evaluated prediction models based on a large database of enteric methane emissions from North American dairy and beef cattle. Most probable models of various complexity levels were identified using a Bayesian model selection procedure and were fitted under a hierarchical setting. Energy intake, dietary fiber and lipid proportions, animal body weight and milk fat proportion were identified as key explanatory variables for predicting emissions. Models here developed substantially outperformed models currently used in national greenhouse gas inventories. Additionally, estimates of repeatability of methane emissions were lower than the ones from the literature and multicollinearity diagnostics suggested that prediction models are stable. In this context, we propose various enteric methane prediction models which require different levels of information availability and can be readily implemented in national greenhouse gas inventories of different complexity levels. The utilization of such models may reduce errors associated with prediction of methane and allow a better examination and representation of policies regulating emissions from cattle.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bayesian modeling; climate change; livestock; methane; prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24259373     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  17 in total

Review 1.  Archaea and the human gut: new beginning of an old story.

Authors:  Nadia Gaci; Guillaume Borrel; William Tottey; Paul William O'Toole; Jean-François Brugère
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Evaluation of a sheep rumen model with fresh forages of diverse chemical composition.

Authors:  Indrakumar Vetharaniam; Ronaldo E Vibart; David Pacheco
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Livestock methane emissions in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander N Hristov; Kristen A Johnson; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Productive, economic, and environmental effects of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) silage for dairy cows in small-scale systems in central Mexico.

Authors:  Aurora Sainz-Ramírez; José Velarde-Guillén; Julieta Gertrudis Estrada-Flores; Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordán
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Trophic strategy of diverse methanogens across a river-to-sea gradient.

Authors:  Bingchen Wang; Fanghua Liu; Shiling Zheng; Qinqin Hao
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Prediction of enteric methane emissions from lactating cows using methane to carbon dioxide ratio in the breath.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Suzuki; Yuko Kamiya; Kohei Oikawa; Itoko Nonaka; Takumi Shinkai; Fuminori Terada; Taketo Obitsu
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.974

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Measurement and Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants.

Authors:  Amlan K Patra
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-20

8.  Diurnal Dynamics of Gaseous and Dissolved Metabolites and Microbiota Composition in the Bovine Rumen.

Authors:  Henk J van Lingen; Joan E Edwards; Jueeli D Vaidya; Sanne van Gastelen; Edoardo Saccenti; Bartholomeus van den Bogert; André Bannink; Hauke Smidt; Caroline M Plugge; Jan Dijkstra
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Development of methane conversion factor models for Zebu beef cattle fed low-quality crop residues and by-products in tropical regions.

Authors:  Chatchai Kaewpila; Kritapon Sommart
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database.

Authors:  Mutian Niu; Ermias Kebreab; Alexander N Hristov; Joonpyo Oh; Claudia Arndt; André Bannink; Ali R Bayat; André F Brito; Tommy Boland; David Casper; Les A Crompton; Jan Dijkstra; Maguy A Eugène; Phil C Garnsworthy; Md Najmul Haque; Anne L F Hellwing; Pekka Huhtanen; Michael Kreuzer; Bjoern Kuhla; Peter Lund; Jørgen Madsen; Cécile Martin; Shelby C McClelland; Mark McGee; Peter J Moate; Stefan Muetzel; Camila Muñoz; Padraig O'Kiely; Nico Peiren; Christopher K Reynolds; Angela Schwarm; Kevin J Shingfield; Tonje M Storlien; Martin R Weisbjerg; David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.