Literature DB >> 24259308

Socioeconomic deprivation and cancer survival in Germany: an ecological analysis in 200 districts in Germany.

Lina Jansen1, Andrea Eberle, Katharina Emrich, Adam Gondos, Bernd Holleczek, Hiltraud Kajüter, Werner Maier, Alice Nennecke, Ron Pritzkuleit, Hermann Brenner.   

Abstract

Although socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival have been demonstrated both within and between countries, evidence on the variation of the inequalities over time past diagnosis is sparse. Furthermore, no comprehensive analysis of socioeconomic differences in cancer survival in Germany has been conducted. Therefore, we analyzed variations in cancer survival for patients diagnosed with one of the 25 most common cancer sites in 1997-2006 in ten population-based cancer registries in Germany (covering 32 million inhabitants). Patients were assigned a socioeconomic status according to the district of residence at diagnosis. Period analysis was used to derive 3-month, 5-year and conditional 1-year and 5-year age-standardized relative survival for 2002-2006 for each deprivation quintile in Germany. Relative survival of patients living in the most deprived district was compared to survival of patients living in all other districts by model-based period analysis. For 21 of 25 cancer sites, 5-year relative survival was lower in the most deprived districts than in all other districts combined. The median relative excess risk of death over the 25 cancer sites decreased from 1.24 in the first 3 months to 1.16 in the following 9 months to 1.08 in the following 4 years. Inequalities persisted after adjustment for stage. These major regional socioeconomic inequalities indicate a potential for improving cancer care and survival in Germany. Studies on individual-level patient data with access to treatment information should be conducted to examine the reasons for these socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in more detail.
© 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Germany; cancer; cancer registry; inequalities; socioeconomic deprivation; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259308     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  24 in total

1.  Socioeconomic disparities of depressive symptoms and cytokines in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hoyee H Cheng; Thomas W Kamarck; Peter J Gianaros; Kathryn A Roecklein; Yanet Vanegas; Allan Tsung; David A Geller; James W Marsh; Nadia S Ahmed; Jennifer L Steel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Socio-economic disparities in long-term cancer survival-10 year follow-up with individual patient data.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Michael Bartels; Susanne Briest; Jens Einenkel; Dietger Niederwieser; Kirsten Papsdorf; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Sophie Künstler; Sabine Taubenheim; Oliver Krauß
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  [Cancer and life style: What really helps?].

Authors:  U Seifart
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  The effect of socioeconomic status on health-care delay and treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nana Wang; Fangli Cao; Fang Liu; Yibin Jia; Jianbo Wang; Cihang Bao; Xintong Wang; Qingxu Song; Bingxu Tan; Yufeng Cheng
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Estimating the potential survival gains by eliminating socioeconomic and sex inequalities in stage at diagnosis of melanoma.

Authors:  M J Rutherford; L Ironmonger; N Ormiston-Smith; G A Abel; D C Greenberg; G Lyratzopoulos; P C Lambert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The adherence paradox: guideline deviations contribute to the increased 5-year survival of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Ute S Albert; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Incorporating Environmental Justice into Second Generation Indices of Multiple Deprivation: Lessons from the UK and Progress Internationally.

Authors:  Jon Fairburn; Werner Maier; Matthias Braubach
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Area deprivation and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and obesity: analysis at the municipality level in Germany.

Authors:  Nina Grundmann; Andreas Mielck; Martin Siegel; Werner Maier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A comparison of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) 2004 with the 2009 + 1 SIMD: does choice of measure affect the interpretation of inequality in mortality?

Authors:  Kevin Ralston; Ruth Dundas; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  Nationwide population-based study reveals increased malignancy risk in taiwanese liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yung Fong Tsai; Hsiu Pin Chen; Fu Chao Liu; Shih Hao Liu; Chun Yu Chen; Chih Wen Cheng; Jr-Rung Lin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.