Literature DB >> 24259031

Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review.

F A Jessop1, C C Lees, S Pathak, C E Hook, N J Sebire.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the frequency of pre-defined clinical outcomes in relation to umbilical cord coiling indices >90th percentile and <10th percentile in an unselected population of >1,000 women with a singleton pregnancy resulting in livebirth delivering at or near term and to report these findings in the context of a systematic review. Placentas of consecutive deliveries from an unselected low-risk population with >15 cm attached umbilical cords were included in the study. Clinical outcomes included interventional delivery, birthweight <10th percentile, Apgar score <7 at 1 min, neonatal acidosis (pH<7.2) and admission to neonatal special care. Standard MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines were observed for the systematic review. Umbilical coiling index was determined for 1,082 placentas. Mean maternal age was 30.7 years (standard deviation [SD] =5.7) and 519 women (48 %) were primiparous. Mean cord length was 43 cm (SD=13) and mean cord coiling index 0.20 (SD=0.09). A total of 866 cords were normally coiled, and 108 cases were hypercoiled (>90th centile) and 108 cases were undercoiled (<10th percentile). There were no differences between cases of overcoiled, normally coiled or undercoiled cords for any clinical outcome studied. The systematic review yielded a small number of clinical studies which were too statistically and clinically heterogenous to permit meta-analysis. There is insufficient evidence either from this unselected cohort study or from a systematic review to support the previous suggestion that cord coiling index >90th centile or <10th centile is associated with adverse clinical outcome in an unselected population. Previous studies that draw a link between abnormal cord coiling and clinical outcome are generally too small and/or selective to allow meaningful conclusions or applicability to low-risk populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259031     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1513-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  25 in total

1.  Best practice no 178. Examination of the human placenta.

Authors:  B Hargitai; T Marton; P M Cox
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term.

Authors:  Sangeeta Pathak; Christoph C Lees; Gerald Hackett; Flora Jessop; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Cord coiling, umbilical cord insertion and placental shape in an unselected cohort delivering at term: relationship with common obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  S Pathak; E Hook; G Hackett; E Murdoch; N J Sebire; F Jessop; C Lees
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  M W M De Laat; A Franx; P G J Nikkels; G H A Visser
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index.

Authors:  N J Sebire
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 6.  Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn.

Authors:  L Armstrong; B J Stenson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  ASCP survey on placental examination. American Society of Clinical Pathologists.

Authors:  D J Gersell
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies.

Authors:  Monique W M de Laat; Arie Franx; Michiel L Bots; Gerard H A Visser; Peter G J Nikkels
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Mladen Predanic; Sriram C Perni; Stephen T Chasen; Rebecca N Baergen; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index.

Authors:  J Rana; G A Ebert; K A Kappy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sonographic Assessment of the Umbilical Cord.

Authors:  S Bosselmann; G Mielke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Association of coexisting morphological umbilical cord abnormality and clinical cord compromise with hypoxic and thrombotic placental histology.

Authors:  Jerzy Stanek
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Factors related to morbidity and maternal and perinatal outcomes of umbilical cord torsion.

Authors:  Rongxin Chen; Jianying Yan; Qing Han; Lianghui Zheng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.