Literature DB >> 24258257

Radiotherapy in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: risk factors, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures in a large Swedish multicenter cohort.

Max Eriksson1, Lotta Anveden, Fuat Celebioglu, Kristina Dahlberg, Ingrid Meldahl, Jakob Lagergren, Catharina Eriksen, Jana de Boniface.   

Abstract

The purpose of this large cohort study was to analyze the effects of prior and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) on surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). All breast cancer patients (n = 725, of whom 29 had bilateral IBR) operated with implant-based IBR at four Stockholm hospitals from 2007 to 2011 were included. The median follow-up was 43 months. Three groups were compared: no RT (n = 386), prior RT (n = 64), and postoperative RT (n = 304). Outcomes were IBR failure (implant loss with or without secondary autologous reconstruction), unplanned reoperations, and PROMs, as measured by the BreastQ(®) questionnaire. IBR failure occurred in 22/386 (6 %) of non-irradiated cases, 16/64 (25 %) after prior and 45/304 (15 %) after postoperative RT (p < 0.001). Failure risk was higher after prior than postoperative RT (HR 9.28 vs. 3.08). Further risk factors were high BMI, less surgeon reconstructive experience, and postoperative infection, while the use of permanent implants lowered the risk of IBR failure. The estimated 5 years IBR failure rate was 10.4 % for non-irradiated, 28.2 % for previously and 25.2 % for postoperatively irradiated patients (p < 0.001). At least one unplanned reoperation occurred in 169/384 of non-irradiated (44 %), 42/64 (66 %) of previously, and 180/303 (59 %) of postoperatively irradiated breasts (p < 0.001). Further contributing factors were the use of one-stage expander and permanent implants, less surgeon reconstructive experience, and smoking. RT significantly impaired scores on all scales of the BreastQ(®). However, a clear majority of women in all groups would choose IBR again. Implant-based IBR remains a feasible option for women undergoing mastectomy as patient satisfaction levels are high. After prior RT, however, autologous alternatives should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258257     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2770-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

1.  Accuracy of a multidisciplinary team-led discussion in predicting postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Wilson; M Dordea; A Light; M P Serra; S R Aspinall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Understanding Risk Factors Associated With Unplanned Reoperation in Major Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Neel R Sangal; Kalin Nishimori; Eric Zhao; Sana H Siddiqui; Soly Baredes; Richard Chan Woo Park
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 3.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Mario Marx; Michael Untch; Andree Faridi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Complications after breast reconstruction with alloplastic material in breast cancer patients submitted or not to post mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Radwanski Stuart; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Cristiane L G Chaves; Eduardo Montag; Thalita C S Cordeiro; Tatiana Taba Fuzisaki; Gustavo N Marta; Heloisa A Carvalho
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-09-30

Review 5.  Radiation-Induced Tissue Damage: Clinical Consequences and Current Treatment Options.

Authors:  Hillary Nepon; Tyler Safran; Edward M Reece; Amanda M Murphy; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Peter G Davison
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 2.195

6.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix-covered implant: a protective technique improving the outcome in post-mastectomy radiation therapy setting.

Authors:  Susanna Polotto; Maria Luisa Bergamini; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Maria F Arcuri; Francesca Gussago; Leonardo Cattelani
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

9.  Reconstructive outcome analysis of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jia-Ruei Yang; Wen-Ling Kuo; Chi-Chang Yu; Shin-Cheh Chen; Jung-Ju Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of Wound Complications After Immediate, Delayed, and Secondary Breast Reconstruction Procedures.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.