Literature DB >> 24258099

Effect of fesoterodine on urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence assessed by urethral pressure reflectometry.

Niels Klarskov1, Amanda Darekar, David Scholfield, Laurence Whelan, Gunnar Lose.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim was to evaluate, using urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR), the effect of fesoterodine on urethral function in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: Women aged 18 to 65 years were eligible for this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study if they had had clinically significant SUI or SUI-predominant mixed urinary incontinence for >3 months. Each participant received fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg, and placebo once daily for 7 days, with a 7- to 10-day washout between treatments. UPR was performed at baseline and 4 to 8 h after the last dose in each treatment period. Participants completed a 3-day bladder diary before randomisation and during the last 3 days of each treatment period.
RESULTS: Of the 22 women randomly assigned and treated, 17 met the criteria for the primary efficacy analyses. No statistically significant differences were seen between fesoterodine 4 mg or fesoterodine 8 mg and placebo in opening urethral pressure (primary endpoint) or other UPR endpoints. No statistically significant differences were seen between either fesoterodine dose and placebo in the change from baseline in the bladder diary variables (total urinary incontinence, SUI, or urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 h). Adverse events were reported by 8 participants taking fesoterodine 4 mg, 17 taking fesoterodine 8 mg, and 8 taking placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Fesoterodine did not affect urethral pressure or significantly decrease the number of incontinence episodes in women with SUI. The UPR parameters showed no placebo effect, while there was a placebo effect of 60 % based on the bladder diary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258099     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2269-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological agents for the treatment of urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder.

Authors:  A J Wein
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.206

2.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  Urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Donna Y Deng
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra.

Authors:  Niels Klarskov; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Treatment options for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Eric S Rovner; Alan J Wein
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 6.  Adolescent urinary tract infections.

Authors:  M Weir; J Brien
Journal:  Adolesc Med       Date:  2000-06

Review 7.  Female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Audrey Wang; Lesley K Carr
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 8.  Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Karl-Erik Andersson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Measurement of urethral closure function in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  N Klarskov; D Scholfield; K Soma; A Darekar; I Mills; G Lose
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Niels Klarskov; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adverse Events Associated with Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.

Authors:  Dobrochna Globerman; Magali Robert
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  The promise of urethral pressure reflectometry: an update.

Authors:  Yasmine Khayyami; Niels Klarskov; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  The placebo and nocebo effects in functional urology.

Authors:  Hadi Mostafaei; Sandra Jilch; Greta Lisa Carlin; Keiichiro Mori; Fahad Quhal; Benjamin Pradere; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Victor M Schuettfort; Abdulmajeed Aydh; Reza Sari Motlagh; Claus G Roehrborn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sakineh Hajebrahimi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.