Literature DB >> 24257965

Skull base meningiomas: neurological outcome after microsurgical resection.

Judith Scheitzach1, Karl-Michael Schebesch, Alexander Brawanski, Martin A Proescholdt.   

Abstract

Microsurgical resection is the primary treatment of skull base meningiomas. Maximal resection provides the best tumor control rates but can be associated with high surgical morbidity. To understand the relation between extent of resection (EOR) and functional outcome we have analyzed the neurological improvement and recurrence rate in a large consecutive series of skull base meningioma patients. In addition, we defined anatomical and biological factors predictive for recurrence and overall outcome. We investigated 226 skull base meningioma patients receiving tumor resection in our institution. The most frequent location was the medial sphenoid ridge (29.6 %). EOR was rated according to the Simpson scale. Overall performance was measured by the Karnofsky performance score (KPS); neurological deficits were quantified using the Medical Research Council Neurological Severity Score (MRC-NPS). Complete resection was achieved in 62.8 % and the EOR was significantly correlated to tumor location. The morbidity and mortality rate was 32.1 and 2.7 % respectively, new permanent neurological deficits occurred in 3.5 % of all patients. From all patients with focal neurological deficits, 60.1 % experienced significant improvement. Both the MRC-NPS and the KPS significantly improved from the preoperative status to discharge, however the improvement rate was dependent on the tumor location. Recurrence rate was 15.5 %; tumor size, bone- and venous sinus infiltration, WHO grade, poor EOR but not MIB-1 labeling index were independent factors predictive for recurrence. Microsurgical resection of skull base meningiomas improves neurological impairment in the majority of patients. Specific risk factors for recurrence require consideration for postoperative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24257965     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1309-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  34 in total

1.  No prediction of recurrence of meningiomas by PCNA and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  M L Møller; O Braendstrup
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Analysis of factors affecting the long-term functional outcome of patients with skull base meningioma.

Authors:  Naoyuki Nakao; Toshika Ohkawa; Junichirou Miki; Hiroki Nishibayahsi; Mitsuhiro Ogura; Yuji Uematsu; Toru Itakura
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  The implications of the heterogeneous distribution of Ki-67 labelled cells in meningiomas.

Authors:  H P Siegers; P Zuber; M F Hamou; G D van Melle; N de Tribolet
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  The role of radical microsurgical resection in multimodal treatment for skull base meningioma.

Authors:  Tsutomu Ichinose; Takeo Goto; Kenichi Ishibashi; Toshihiro Takami; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Management of atypical and malignant meningiomas: role of high-dose, 3D-conformal radiation therapy.

Authors:  E B Hug; A Devries; A F Thornton; J E Munzenride; F S Pardo; E T Hedley-Whyte; M R Bussiere; R Ojemann
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Clinical management of petroclival meningiomas and the eternal quest for preservation of quality of life: personal experiences over a period of 20 years.

Authors:  Volker Seifert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 7.  Stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  John M McGregor; Atom Sarkar
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: functional outcome after microsurgical resection in a consecutive series of 106 patients. Clinical article.

Authors:  Hischam Bassiouni; Siamak Asgari; I Erol Sandalcioglu; Volker Seifert; Dietmar Stolke; Gerhard Marquardt
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  ABC Surgical Risk Scale for skull base meningioma: a new scoring system for predicting the extent of tumor removal and neurological outcome. Clinical article.

Authors:  Kazuhide Adachi; Takeshi Kawase; Kazunari Yoshida; Takahito Yazaki; Satoshi Onozuka
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  A comparison of World Health Organization tumor grades at recurrence in patients with non-skull base and skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Susan L McGovern; Kenneth D Aldape; Mark F Munsell; Anita Mahajan; Franco DeMonte; Shiao Y Woo
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  14 in total

1.  Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base.

Authors:  Torstein R Meling; Michele Da Broi; David Scheie; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  A comparison of clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes between pediatric skull base and non-skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Zhicen Li; Hao Li; Yuming Jiao; Ji Ma; Shuo Wang; Jizong Zhao; Yong Cao
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?

Authors:  Kira Marie Voß; Dorothee Cäcilia Spille; Cristina Sauerland; Eric Suero Molina; Caroline Brokinkel; Werner Paulus; Walter Stummer; Markus Holling; Astrid Jeibmann; Benjamin Brokinkel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Cranial nerve outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery for symptomatic skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Andrew Faramand; Hideyuki Kano; Ajay Niranjan; Stephen A Johnson; Mohab Hassib; Kyung-Jae Park; Yoshio Arai; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Minimally invasive surgery of the anterior skull base: transorbital approaches.

Authors:  Holger G Gassner; Franziska Schwan; Karl-Michael Schebesch
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07-11

6.  Long Term Surgical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Atypical and Malignant Meningiomas.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Wang; Chi-Cheng Chuang; Kuo-Chen Wei; Cheng-Nen Chang; Shih-Tseng Lee; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Yung-Hsin Hsu; Tzu-Kan Lin; Peng-Wei Hsu; Yin-Cheng Huang; Chen-Kan Tseng; Chun-Chieh Wang; Yao-Liang Chen; Pin-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Incidence, Clinico-Radiological Features and Outcome of Skull Base versus Non-Skull Base Meningiomas Treated in Kuala Lumpur General Hospital: A Five-Year Experience.

Authors:  Chan Chee Kong; Regunath Kandasamy; Saffari Haspani; Zamzuri Idris; Jafri Malin Abdullah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 8.  Advances in Multidisciplinary Management of Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Tamara Ius; Alessandro Tel; Giuseppe Minniti; Teresa Somma; Domenico Solari; Michele Longhi; Pasquale De Bonis; Alba Scerrati; Mario Caccese; Valeria Barresi; Alba Fiorentino; Leonardo Gorgoglione; Giuseppe Lombardi; Massimo Robiony
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Meninigiomas of the Craniocervical Junction--A Distinctive Subgroup of Meningiomas.

Authors:  Lasse Dührsen; Pedram Emami; Jakob Matschke; Tammam Abboud; Manfred Westphal; Jan Regelsberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How to compare clinical results of different neurosurgical centers? Is a classification of complications in neurosurgery necessary for this purpose?

Authors:  Stefano Brock; Christian Saleh; Edvin Zekaj; Domenico Servello
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.