Literature DB >> 24257066

Patients do not always complain when they are dissatisfied: implications for service quality and patient safety.

Matylda Howard1, Mary Louise Fleming, Elizabeth Parker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the actions taken by patients who had been admitted to an acute care Queensland hospital and experienced dissatisfaction with service delivery. It is proposed that before complaints can be used as part of a strategy to inform health service improvement and ultimately ensure patient safety, an understanding of the effectiveness of the complaints handling process from the patient's perspective must be gained.
METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews using a phenomenological exploration were undertaken. The theoretical framework supporting the thematic analysis of the interview data was drawn from Lazarus's cognitive emotive model of coping. Analysis of the research data, aided by Leximancer software, revealed a series of relational themes that supported the interpretative data analysis process undertaken.
FINDINGS: In 16 interviews, the study outcomes identified that 15 of the participants did not voice their complaint at the time of the event, but after the event, they stated they wished that they had reacted differently and complained at the actual point in time that they were dissatisfied. The themes that emerged that reflected potential lost opportunities included issues with ineffective communication, being treated with disrespect, inconsistent standards of care, perceptions of negligence, and lack of information about how to make a complaint.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that health-care professionals should take a more active role in identifying and responding to patients who are experiencing dissatisfaction but are not actively complaining. This level of vigilance and responsiveness will ensure opportunities to improve health service delivery, and patient safety are not lost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24257066      PMCID: PMC6438369          DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182913837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  11 in total

1.  Risk management: how doctors, hospitals and MDOs can limit the costs of malpractice litigation.

Authors:  L L Wilson; M Fulton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Planning and recruiting the sample for focus groups and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  C MacDougall; E Fudge
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2001-01

3.  Managing medical indemnity: must we choose between quality assurance and risk management?

Authors:  Paul Nisselle
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 4.  Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research.

Authors:  Lorna de Witt; Jenny Ploeg
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  The organisational response to patient complaints: a case study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Sophie Y Hsieh; David Thomas; Arie Rotem
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv       Date:  2005

7.  A 30-month study of patient complaints at a major Australian hospital.

Authors:  K Anderson; D Allan; P Finucane
Journal:  J Qual Clin Pract       Date:  2001-12

Review 8.  Phenomenology: an exploration.

Authors:  Danuta M Wojnar; Kristen M Swanson
Journal:  J Holist Nurs       Date:  2007-09

9.  Patient satisfaction: focusing on "excellent".

Authors:  Koichiro Otani; Brian Waterman; Kelly M Faulkner; Sarah Boslaugh; Thomas E Burroughs; W Claiborne Dunagan
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

10.  Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology.

Authors:  Ludmila Marcinowicz; Slawomir Chlabicz; Ryszard Grebowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improving the perception of respect for and the dignity of inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pablo Eduardo Pereira Dutra; Laiana Azevedo Quagliato; Antonio Egidio Nardi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence and front-line insights.

Authors:  Jackie van Dael; Tom W Reader; Alex Gillespie; Ana Luisa Neves; Ara Darzi; Erik K Mayer
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 3.  A meta-ethnography of the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of patient complaints processes in health-care settings.

Authors:  David A H Scott; Suzanne M Grant
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Zhaohua Deng; Ziying Hong; Richard Evans; Jingdong Ma; Hui Zhang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Use of patient complaints to identify diagnosis-related safety concerns: a mixed-method evaluation.

Authors:  Traber D Giardina; Saritha Korukonda; Umber Shahid; Viralkumar Vaghani; Divvy K Upadhyay; Greg F Burke; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.