| Literature DB >> 24256970 |
Zhihua Bao1, Kazuhiro Sasaki, Takashi Okubo, Seishi Ikeda, Mizue Anda, Eiko Hanzawa, Kaori Kakizaki, Tadashi Sato, Hisayuki Mitsui, Kiwamu Minamisawa.
Abstract
Rice seedlings were inoculated with Azospirillum sp. B510 and transplanted into a paddy field. Growth in terms of tiller numbers and shoot length was significantly increased by inoculation. Principal-coordinates analysis of rice bacterial communities using the 16S rRNA gene showed no overall change from B510 inoculation. However, the abundance of Veillonellaceae and Aurantimonas significantly increased in the base and shoots, respectively, of B510-inoculated plants. The abundance of Azospirillum did not differ between B510-inoculated and uninoculated plants (0.02-0.50%). These results indicate that the application of Azospirillum sp. B510 not only enhanced rice growth, but also affected minor rice-associated bacteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24256970 PMCID: PMC4070703 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me13049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1Principal-coordinates analysis (PCoA) of bacterial communities in the base and the shoot of rice plants with (+) and without (−) Azospirillum sp. B510 inoculation. ▼, Shoot without inoculation (control); ●, shoot with inoculation; ■, base with inoculation; ▲, base without inoculation (control). Broken line (---): microbial communities of shoot with and without Azospirillum sp. B510 inoculation; solid line (—): microbial communities of base with and without Azospirillum sp. B510 inoculation.
Relative abundance of the predominant bacterial taxa (as determined from 16S rRNA) in base and shoot of rice plants inoculated with Azospirillum sp. B510 (n=3 for each sample). Standard deviation is shown in parentheses.
| Taxa | Relative abundance (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Base | Shoot | |||
|
|
| |||
| − | + | − | + | |
| 53.9 (3.7) | 56.0 (9.2) | 91.3 (1.6) | 91 (2.0) | |
| | 38.4 (1.9) | 36.8 (6.2) | 55.7 (7.6) | 55.2 (3.1) |
| | 33.5 (1.5) | 31.5 (4.3) | 47.5 (5.0) | 48.2 (3.1) |
| | 9.5 (1.4) | 12.6 (0.8) | 20.7 (8.3) | 16.3 (3.3) |
| | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.3 (0.1) | 15.2 (1.5) | 22.0 (4.1) |
| | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.03) | 4.8 (0.6) | 6.3* (1.0) |
| | 5.0 (0.4) | 2.9* (0.5) | 0.4 (0.1) | 0.5 (1.0) |
| | 0.6 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.3) | 4.3 (2.4) | 3.5 (0.7) |
| | 7.4 (0.7) | 10.7 (2.2) | 21.0 (10.4) | 11.0 (4.8) |
| | 6.9 (0.7) | 9.7 (2.1) | 21.0 (10.4) | 11.0 (4.8) |
| | 4.3 (3.9) | 4.6 (1.6) | 13.5 (6.2) | 22.9 (10.1) |
| | 1.1 (0.3) | 0.9 (0.2) | 0.3 (0.2) | 1.1 (1.2) |
| Others | 2.7 (0.4) | 3.1 (0.7) | 0.8 (0.2) | 0.8 (0.3) |
| 10.6 (2.1) | 15.6 (4.5) | 2.9 (0.8) | 3.6 (1.5) | |
| | 1.8 (0.4) | 3.3* (0.7) | <0.03 | <0.02 |
| | 1.8 (0.2) | 3.3* (0.3) | <0.03 | <0.02 |
| | 1.4 (0.3) | 2.7* (0.5) | <0.03 | <0.02 |
| | 5.6 (1.1) | 8.2 (4.5) | 2.7 (0.7) | 3.4 (1.4) |
| | 3.2 (1.0) | 4.1 (1.7) | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.1 (0.1) |
| 14.0 (0.9) | 10.0 (2.1) | 1.1 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.2) | |
| 4.7 (0.6) | 4.1 (0.9) | 0.8 (0.1) | 0.6 (0.2) | |
Asterisks indicate a significant difference (P<0.05; t-test) between uninoculated controls (−) and inoculated plants (+). Data for bacterial taxa with low relative abundance (<1%) are not shown. Grey areas highlight the taxa with relative abundance, significantly different between inoculated and uninoculated rice plants.
Fig. 2Relative abundance of Azospirillum spp. in the rice plant’s base and shoot with (+) and without (−) Azospirillum sp. B510 inoculation.