Literature DB >> 24256352

High percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in pathological stage T3a prostate cancer with a negative surgical margin.

Dalsan You1, In Gab Jeong, Cheryn Song, Yong Mee Cho, Jun Hyuk Hong, Choung-Soo Kim, Hanjong Ahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of percent tumor volume and surgical margin status on biochemical recurrence in pT3-T4 prostate cancer.
METHODS: A total of 397 patients who had pT3-T4N0 diseases and did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were included for analysis.
RESULTS: In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen (per 1 ng/mL increase; hazard ratio 1.019; P = 0.002), pathological stage (T3b-T4 vs T3a; hazard ratio 2.283; P < 0.001), Gleason score (≥8 vs ≤6; hazard ratio 5.290; P = 0.005), surgical margin status (multiple positive vs negative; hazard ratio 1.839; P = 0.003) and lymphovascular invasion (present vs absent; hazard ratio 1.641; P = 0.008) were independent predictors of recurrence. Percent tumor volume was an independent predictor of recurrence in T3a diseases with negative surgical margins. In analysis using receiver operating characteristic curve, a threshold of 12% showed the best balance of sensitivity and specificity, 66% and 67%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of pT3a diseases with negative surgical margin were 85.2% for percent tumor volume ≤12% and 57.7% for percent tumor volume >12% (P < 0.001). Patients with pT3a with negative surgical margins and percent tumor volume >12% showed comparable 5-year recurrence-free survival rate compared with those with pT3a with positive surgical margin (57.7% vs 57.6%; P = 0.763).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite having less impact on recurrence than other clinicopathological variables in pT3-T4 prostate cancer, percent tumor volume can further improve recurrence risk stratification in pT3a diseases with negative surgical margins.
© 2013 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biochemical recurrence; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; surgical margins; tumor volume

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24256352     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

1.  Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Meng; He Li; Peng Xu; Jia Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Percent tumor volume vs American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system subclassification for predicting biochemical recurrence in patients with pathologic T2 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Se Young Choi; Byung Hoon Chi; Bumjin Lim; Yoon Soo Kyung; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients with prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy and its association with their clinicopathological features: An updated PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Yuan Jun; Yuefang Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Is lymphovascular invasion a powerful predictor for biochemical recurrence in pT3 N0 prostate cancer? Results from the K-CaP database.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Park; Yejin Kim; Hwanjo Yu; In Young Choi; Seok-Soo Byun; Cheol Kwak; Byung Ha Chung; Hyun Moo Lee; Choung Soo Kim; Ji Youl Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Can Tumour Volume Percentage in Radical Prostatectomy Predict Cancer Biochemical Recurrence? Determining a Cut-off Point and Composite Risk Factors Approach.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Mohamed Ismail; Christopher Eden
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.