Literature DB >> 24256315

In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum.

Brad B Nelson1, Diana M Hassel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc™) to its suture material equivalent (Biosyn™) in a single-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental in vitro study. ANIMALS: Jejunal sections from adult horses (n = 5) without gastrointestinal disease.
METHODS: Jejunal end-to-end anastomoses (n = 9) were performed for each group (V-Loc™, Biosyn™) with a continuous Lembert pattern with an interruption every 120°. Anastomosis construction time, luminal diameter, and number of suture bites were recorded. Anastomosis constructs were distended with fluid at 1 L/min until failure. Location and intraluminal pressure at failure were recorded and all measurements were compared between groups.
RESULTS: V-Loc™ anastomoses were significantly faster to perform (13.1 ± 0.35 minutes) when compared to the Biosyn™ group (15.6 ± 0.72 minutes; P = .0004). No differences were observed for anastomotic index or number of suture bites. V-Loc™ anastomosis constructs had a significantly decreased bursting pressure (160 ± 11.6 mmHg) compared to Biosyn™ constructs (184 ± 16.9 mmHg; P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: V-Loc™ allowed faster construction time and did not cause a decreased anastomosis luminal diameter when compared with Biosyn™. V-Loc™ had a decreased bursting strength compared with Biosyn™, albeit well above pathologic pressures encountered clinically. Use of V-Loc™ may be beneficial for decreasing the amount of exposed suture material because of the absence of knots after construction and has the potential to result in decreased adhesions. © Copyright 2013 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24256315     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12081.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  7 in total

Review 1.  Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manuel Ferrer-Márquez; Ricardo Belda-Lozano; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Comparison between barbed and conventional sutures for longitudinal thelotomy closure in an ex-vivo bovine model.

Authors:  Neshan W Sarkisian; Pierre-Yves Mulon
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.075

3.  Bidirectional knotless barbed versus conventional smooth suture for closure of surgical wounds in inguinal castration in horses.

Authors:  Ditte Marie Top Adler; Stine Østergaard; Elin Jørgensen; Stine Jacobsen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Effect of three different needle holders on gastrointestinal anastomosis construction time and bursting pressure in equine jejunal segments.

Authors:  Kate Averay; Gaby van Galen; Michael Ward; Denis Verwilghen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Ex Vivo Comparison of a UV-Polymerizable Methacrylate Adhesive versus an Inverting Pattern as the Second Layer of a Two-Layer Hand-Sewn Jejunal Anastomosis in Horses: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Augustin Lenoir; Bertrand R M Perrin; Olivier M Lepage
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2021-04-04

6.  Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model.

Authors:  Daniel J Duffy; Yi-Jen Chang; George E Moore
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.618

7.  Use of Barbed Sutures in Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Single-Layer Sutures.

Authors:  Tomoya Tsukada; Masahide Kaji; Jun Kinoshita; Koichi Shimizu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.