Literature DB >> 24256216

Are patients with intracerebral haemorrhage disadvantaged in hospitals?

Renee Sheedy1, Julie Bernhardt, Christopher R Levi, Mark Longworth, Leonid Churilov, Monique F Kilkenny, Dominique A Cadilhac.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Providing evidence-based clinical care reduces disability and mortality rates following stroke. We examined if compliance with evidence-based processes of care were different for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage when compared with ischemic stroke and sought to describe differences in health outcomes during hospitalization and at time of discharge for these stroke subtypes.
METHODS: The New South Wales acute stroke dataset was used. This included data from 50-100 consecutively admitted patients' medical records collected from 32 New South Wales hospitals between 2003 and 2010. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted taking into account patient factors and clustering of patients by hospital.
RESULTS: Ischemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage cases had similar demographic features (ischemic stroke n = 3467, mean age 74 years [standard deviation 13], 50% female; intracerebral haemorrhage n = 275, mean age 74 years [standard deviation 13], 48% female). Following multivariable analyses patients with intracerebral haemorrhage were less likely to be admitted to a stroke unit (adjusted odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.94) or receive an assessment from allied health (adjusted odds ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.89) than patients with ischemic stroke. Patients with intracerebral haemorrhage are also less likely to be independent (adjusted odds ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.3-0.5) at time of hospital discharge and had a greater odds of dying in hospital (adjusted odds ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.3-3.5). Patients that were admitted to a stroke unit had a greater odds of being independent (modified Rankin Score 0-2) at day 7-10 irrespective of stroke type or severity on admission (adjusted odds ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.66).
CONCLUSIONS: Following intracerebral haemorrhage, patients were less likely to be admitted to an acute stroke unit and receive allied health interventions. Admission to stroke units improved the likelihood of being independent at days 7-10 and, therefore, more should be done to encourage evidence-based care for intracerebral haemorrhage.
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hospital management; indicators; intracerebral haemorrhage; quality assessment; stroke; stroke care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24256216     DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  3 in total

1.  What is the evolution of stroke unit's accessibility in metropolitan France from 2009 to 2014? A trend analysis of over 600 000 patients using national hospital databases.

Authors:  Marion Istvan; Camille Lecoffre; Sahar Bayat; Yannick Béjot; Yann Le Strat; Christine De Peretti; Fei Gao; Valérie Olié; Olivier Grimaud
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Factors predicting clinically significant functional gain and discharge to home in stroke in-patients after rehabilitation - A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tony Kwun-Tak Li; Bobby Hin-Po Ng; Dora Yuk-Lin Chan; Ruthy Suet-Fan Chung; Kim-Kam Yu
Journal:  Hong Kong J Occup Ther       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Early physical rehabilitation vs standard care for intracerebral hemorrhage stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaorong Cheng; Shunqin Mao; Yibao Zhang; Xiaoyun Peng; Rui Ma; Yingcun Bao; Qun Li; Mei Liu; Dengjuan Sun; Bo Wan; Lulu Wang; Fang Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.