| Literature DB >> 24255682 |
Fengfeng Li1, Bin He, Shen Liu, Cunyi Fan.
Abstract
The present study investigated the effectiveness of celecoxib in preventing the formation of joint adhesions. Rabbit models of joint adhesion were created and the rabbits in two treatment groups were orally administered celecoxib or ibuprofen (as a positive control) for 30 days. Rabbits in the control group did not receive any treatment. Following the 30-day experimental period, the inhibitory effects of celecoxib and ibuprofen on the formation of joint adhesion were assessed using a number of methods, including the study of macroscopic appearance, histology and contracture angle. Thick fibrous adhesions developed in the knees of the rabbits in the control group. By contrast, few adhesions were observed in the two treatment groups, and those observed were soft, weak and easily stretched. Fewer adhesions were observed in the rabbits treated with celecoxib than in the rabbits in the other groups. The adhesion scores and contracture angles in the celecoxib (P<0.001) and ibuprofen (0.001<P<0.0025) groups were significantly lower than those of the control group. Moreover, the adhesion scores and contracture angles were significantly lower in the celecoxib group than in the ibuprofen group (0.025<P<0.05). Histologically, the adhesion tissues in the two treatment groups, particularly in the celecoxib group, were loose and thin with sparse fiber formation. The cell densities in the two treatment groups, of which the ibuprofen group had higher cell densities (0.025<P<0.05), were significantly lower than those in the control group (celecoxib group, P<0.001; ibuprofen group, 0.001<P<0.0025). These results indicated that celecoxib effectively inhibited the formation of joint adhesions and therefore may provide a novel and potent approach for their prevention.Entities:
Keywords: celecoxib; ibuprofen; joint adhesion; nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibitor; selective cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibitor
Year: 2013 PMID: 24255682 PMCID: PMC3829728 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Creation of the animal model and measurement of the flexion contracture angle. (A) Removal of an osteochondral portion of the condyle. (B) Immobilization of the knee joint with a Kirschner wire. (C) Extension of the knee joint by pulling the suture with a tension of 4.9 N while the left thigh was firmly fixed to the table. The tension was produced using a dynamometer. (D) Radiography was performed to determine the contracture angle. A 1–0 suture was tied to the left ankle and the direction of the suture was maintained perpendicular to the tibial axis. a, flexion contracture angle.
celecoxib
(P<0.001) groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (Table I). Moreover, the adhesion scores were significantly lower in the celecoxib group than those in the ibuprofen group (Table I; 0.025
Figure 2Photographs and histological analyses of adhesions in knee joints. Compared with the adhesions in (A and D) the control group and (B and E) the ibuprofen group, the adhesions in (C and F) the celecoxib group were reduced in number and volume. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (original magnification, ×100).
Adhesion scores of the rabbits in the control and treatment groups.
| Group | Number | Adhesion scores | P-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8 | 3.6±0.4 | NA | NA |
| Ibuprofen | 8 | 1.9±0.3 | 0.001<P<0.0025 | NA |
| Celecoxib | 8 | 1.4±0.3 | P<0.001 | 0.025<P<0.05 |
Compared with the control group;
Compared with the ibuprofen group.
All animals in each group were used for this evaluation. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Values of P<0.05 are considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. NA, not applicable.
celecoxib
group than those in the ibuprofen group (Table II; 0.025
Cell densities of the rabbits in the control and treatment groups.
| Group | Number | Total cells (per hpf) | P-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8 | 229±19 | NA | NA |
| Ibuprofen | 8 | 158±13 | 0.001<P<0.0025 | NA |
| Celecoxib | 8 | 124±9 | P<0.001 | 0.025<P<0.05 |
Compared with the control group;
Compared with the ibuprofen group.
All animals in each group were used for this evaluation. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Values of P<0.05 are considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. hpf, high-power field; NA, not applicable.
contracture
angles were significantly lower in the celecoxib group than in the ibuprofen group (0.025
Contracture angles of the rabbits in the control and treatment groups.
| Group | Number | Contracture angles (°) | P-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 11 | 120.0±11.2 | NA | NA |
| Ibuprofen | 9 | 44.2±4.4 | 0.001<P<0.0025 | NA |
| Celecoxib | 9 | 26.4±3.4 | P<0.001 | 0.025<P<0.05 |
Compared with the control group;
Compared with the ibuprofen group.
All animals in each group were used for this evaluation. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Values of P<0.05 are considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. NA, not applicable.