| Literature DB >> 24255669 |
Jun-Feng Liu1, Zhong-Dong DU, Zhi Chen, Zhong-Chao Han, Zhi-Xu He.
Abstract
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has exhibited efficacy at preventing the progression of pulmonary hypertension (PH); however, the exact mechanism is not completely clear. The aim of the present study was to assess whether this protective effect was mediated by the upregulation of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) via the nitric oxide (NO) system. PH was induced in male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats by the administration of a single subcutaneous injection of monocrotaline (MCT). The rats were treated with recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF, 50 μg/kg/day) by subcutaneous injection from day five to day seven subsequent to the injection of MCT. Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 4 mg/kg/day) was intragastrically administered in addition to rhG-CSF as a negative intervention. The changes in hemodynamics and histology, the number and function of circulating EPCs and the concentration of plasma NO were evaluated. With the occurrence of PH in the rat model, the number and function of circulating EPCs were demonstrated to be markedly downregulated. Moreover, a reduced plasma concentration of NO was observed, which was positively correlated with the number of circulating EPCs. Administration of rhG-CSF elevated the plasma level of NO, upregulated the number and function of circulating EPCs and effectively improved pulmonary hemodynamics and vascular reconstruction. Furthermore, the positive correlation between the levels of plasma NO and circulating EPCs was also observed in the rhG-CSF treatment group. However, the protective effect of rhG-CSF in PH was attenuated by L-NAME, which mediated the downregulation of NO and the EPCs. Thus, the present study suggests that G-CSF may attenuate the progression of MCT-induced PH by improving vascular injury repair mechanisms via the NO-mediated upregulation of EPCs.Entities:
Keywords: endothelial progenitor cells; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; hemodynamics; model; nitric oxide; pulmonary hypertension
Year: 2013 PMID: 24255669 PMCID: PMC3829734 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Effect of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) on pulmonary hypertension (PH). (A–D) Optical photomicrographs of lung stained with hematoxylin and eosin (magnification, ×400). (A) Control group, (B) model group, (C) rhG-CSF treatment group and (D) Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) intervention group. (E–G) Changes in (E) right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), (F) mean aortic pressure (MAoP) and (G) wall thickness (WT) in each group. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, n=8. *P<0.01 compared with the control group; †P<0.01 compared with the model group; #P>0.05 compared with the control group; **P<0.01 compared with the rhG-CSF treatment group.
Figure 2Levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and nitric oxide (NO). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, n=8. (A) Numbers of EPCs in peripheral blood. *P<0.01 compared with the control group; †P<0.01 compared with the model and control groups; **P<0.01 compared with the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) treatment group. (B) Plasma concentration of NO. *P<0.01 compared with the control group; †P<0.01 compared with the model group; #P>0.05 compared with the control group; **P<0.01 compared with the rhG-CSF treatment group. (C–E) Linear regression correlation between the number of circulating EPCs and the plasma concentration of NO in the (C) model (r=0.792, P<0.05); (D) rhG-CSF treatment (r=0.836, P<0.05) and (E) Nω-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME) intervention (r=0.889, P<0.05) groups.
Figure 3Function of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in vitro. (A–D) Identification of EPCs: EPCs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of rats were cultured in vitro for seven days. (A) The cells showed a spindle-like morphology, the typical morphology of EPCs (magnification, ×100). The majority of the cells were immunopositive for (B) fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated lectin from Ulex europeus agglutinin-1 (FITC-UEA-1) and (C) DiI-labeled acetylated low-density lipoprotein (DiI-acLDL). The cells positive for the two labels (see yellow fluorescence) were recognized as EPCs in differentiation (D). (E–G) EPC functions in vitro: (E) Proliferation, (F) adhesion and (G) migration. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, n=8. *P<0.05 compared with the control group; †P<0.05 compared with the model group; #P>0.05 compared with the control group; **P<0.01 compared with the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF treatment group).