BACKGROUND: Cadmium has been associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in cross-sectional studies, but prospective evidence is lacking. Our goal was to evaluate the association of urine cadmium concentrations with incident PAD in a large population-based cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was performed with 2864 adult American Indians 45 to 74 years of age from Arizona, Oklahoma, and North and South Dakota who participated in the Strong Heart Study from 1989 to 1991 and were followed through 2 follow-up examination visits in 1993 to 1995 and 1997 to 1999. Participants were free of PAD, defined as an ankle brachial index <0.9 or >1.4 at baseline, and had complete baseline information on urine cadmium, potential confounders, and ankle brachial index determinations in the follow-up examinations. Urine cadmium was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and corrected for urinary dilution by normalization to urine creatinine. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were computed using Cox-proportional hazards models for interval-censored data. A total of 470 cases of incident PAD, defined as an ankle brachial index <0.9 or >1.4, were identified. After adjustment for cardiovascular disease risk factors including smoking status and pack-years, the hazard ratio comparing the 80th to the 20th percentile of urine cadmium concentrations was 1.41 (1.05-1.81). The hazard ratio comparing the highest to the lowest tertile was 1.96 (1.32-2.81). The association persisted after excluding participants with ankle brachial index >1.4 only as well as in subgroups defined by sex and smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: Urine cadmium, a biomarker of long-term cadmium exposure, was independently associated with incident PAD, providing further support for cadmium as a cardiovascular disease risk factor.
BACKGROUND:Cadmium has been associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in cross-sectional studies, but prospective evidence is lacking. Our goal was to evaluate the association of urine cadmium concentrations with incident PAD in a large population-based cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was performed with 2864 adult American Indians 45 to 74 years of age from Arizona, Oklahoma, and North and South Dakota who participated in the Strong Heart Study from 1989 to 1991 and were followed through 2 follow-up examination visits in 1993 to 1995 and 1997 to 1999. Participants were free of PAD, defined as an ankle brachial index <0.9 or >1.4 at baseline, and had complete baseline information on urine cadmium, potential confounders, and ankle brachial index determinations in the follow-up examinations. Urine cadmium was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and corrected for urinary dilution by normalization to urine creatinine. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were computed using Cox-proportional hazards models for interval-censored data. A total of 470 cases of incident PAD, defined as an ankle brachial index <0.9 or >1.4, were identified. After adjustment for cardiovascular disease risk factors including smoking status and pack-years, the hazard ratio comparing the 80th to the 20th percentile of urine cadmium concentrations was 1.41 (1.05-1.81). The hazard ratio comparing the highest to the lowest tertile was 1.96 (1.32-2.81). The association persisted after excluding participants with ankle brachial index >1.4 only as well as in subgroups defined by sex and smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: Urine cadmium, a biomarker of long-term cadmium exposure, was independently associated with incident PAD, providing further support for cadmium as a cardiovascular disease risk factor.
Authors: Christopher J Schmitt; William G Brumbaugh; Gregory L Linder; Jo Ellen Hinck Journal: Environ Geochem Health Date: 2006-06-22 Impact factor: 4.609
Authors: Maria Tellez-Plaza; Ana Navas-Acien; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; A Richey Sharrett; Eliseo Guallar Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: O Gökalp; S Ozdem; S Dönmez; M Dogan; H Demirin; H Y Kara; R Sütcü; E Cicek; M K Ozer; N Delibas Journal: Toxicol Ind Health Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Walter C Prozialeck; Joshua R Edwards; Daniel W Nebert; James M Woods; Aaron Barchowsky; William D Atchison Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Gervasio A Lamas; Robin Boineau; Christine Goertz; Daniel B Mark; Yves Rosenberg; Mario Stylianou; Theodore Rozema; Richard L Nahin; L Terry Chappell; Lauren Lindblad; Eldrin F Lewis; Jeanne Drisko; Kerry L Lee Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Francisco Ujueta; Ivan A Arenas; Esteban Escolar; Denisse Diaz; Robin Boineau; Daniel B Mark; Patrick Golden; Lauren Lindblad; Hwasoon Kim; Kerry L Lee; Gervasio A Lamas Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2019-04-14 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: F Gerry R Fowkes; Victor Aboyans; Freya J I Fowkes; Mary M McDermott; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Michael H Criqui Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Pablo Olmedo; Maria Grau-Perez; Amanda Fretts; Maria Tellez-Plaza; Fernando Gil; Fawn Yeh; Jason G Umans; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Nora Franceschini; Elisa T Lee; Lyle G Best; Shelley A Cole; Barbara V Howard; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Jonathan D Newman; Ana Navas-Acien; Chin-Chi Kuo; Eliseo Guallar; Barbara V Howard; Richard R Fabsitz; Richard B Devereux; Jason G Umans; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Lyle T Best; Maria Tellez-Plaza Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Khadijah Breathett; Mario Sims; Marie Gross; Elizabeth A Jackson; Emily J Jones; Ana Navas-Acien; Herman Taylor; Kevin L Thomas; Barbara V Howard Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 29.690