Literature DB >> 24254868

Use of odor baits in traps to test reactions to intra- and interspecific chemical cues in house mice living in outdoor enclosures.

L C Drickamer1, D G Mikesic, K S Shaffer.   

Abstract

House mice (Mus musculus) living in outdoor enclosures were tested for urinary chemical cue preferences using odor-baited traps. In the first experiment, with only volatile cues available, odors from conspecific males and females of various age classes and reproductive conditions were tested; no preferences were exhibited. In the second experiment mice had both nonvolatile and volatile cues available from the same sources as in experiment I. All age and sex class and female reproductive condition groups exhibited odor cue preferences except juvenile females. There were no specific odor cue preferences exhibited by any of the responder types with regard to odors from juvenile females. In the third and fifth experiments, mice were presented with nonvolatile plus volatile or only volatile urine odor cues, respectively, from four genera,Mus, Peromyscus, Microtus, andHomo. Mice of all age classes and both sexes preferredMus musculus odor, were neutral towardMicrotus ochrogaster odor, and avoided odors fromPeromyscus leucopus andHomo sapiens; these patterns were the same regardless of whether only volatile or both volatile and nonvolatile cues were presented. The fourth and sixth experiments involved testing volatile cues only and volatile cues plus nonvolatile cues from human sweat or feces from dogs, cats, or shrews. Mice avoided the human sweat and feces from cats and shrews, but were neutral toward the odor of dog feces. There were effects on whether mice were trapped in the interior of the enclosure or on the perimeter for some odors tested in these six experiments. The findings provide insights regarding possible functions of odor cues in the behavioral ecology of house mice. Odor-baiting traps can be an effective tool with respect to testing some, but not all questions pertaining to olfactory cues and house mouse social biology.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 24254868     DOI: 10.1007/BF00984947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  13 in total

1.  Urinary chemosignals, reproduction, and population size for house mice (Mus domesticus) living in field enclosures.

Authors:  L C Drickamer; D G Mikesic
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Reactions of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) to homospecific and heterospecific urine odors.

Authors:  R L Doty
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-08

3.  Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T locus: a response to T-locus or H-2-locus variability?

Authors:  S Lenington; K Egid
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Seasonally variable effects of conspecific odors upon capture of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus gambelii).

Authors:  M Daly; M I Wilson; S F Faux
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1978-06

5.  Acceleration and delay of sexual maturation in female mice via chemosignals: circadian rhythm effects.

Authors:  L C Drickamer
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Mouse vomeronasal organ: effects on chemosignal production and maternal behavior.

Authors:  J J Lepri; C J Wysocki; J G Vandenbergh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1985-11

7.  Mice: individual recognition by olfactory cues.

Authors:  J M Bowers; B K Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  The reproductive ecology of the house mouse.

Authors:  F H Bronson
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.875

9.  Patterns of deposition of urine containing chemosignals that affect puberty and reproduction by wild stock male and female house mice (Mus domesticus).

Authors:  L C Drickamer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; E A Boyse; V Miké; H T Thaler; B J Mathieson; J Abbott; J Boyse; Z A Zayas; L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-11-02       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Male House Mouse Pheromone Components on Behavioral Responses of Mice in Laboratory and Field Experiments.

Authors:  Antonia E Musso; Regine Gries; Huimin Zhai; Stephen Takács; Gerhard Gries
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Odors in traps: Does most recent occupant influence capture rates for house mice?

Authors:  L C Drickamer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Receiving behaviour is sensitive to risks from eavesdropping predators.

Authors:  Nelika K Hughes; Jennifer L Kelley; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.