PURPOSE: Poly-ostotic Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) can be difficult to distinguish clinically and histologically from disseminated infection in manifesting specific subtypes of Mendelian Susceptibility to Mycobacterial Disease (MSMD). In MSMD-patients, dominant negative germline mutations in the IFN-γR1 gene, in particular in exon 6, lead to autosomal dominant IFN-γ receptor 1 deficiency (ADIFNGR1) and can mimic LCH. We hypothesized that similar defects might underlie the pathogenesis of LCH. METHODS: IFN-γR1 expression was immunohistochemically determined at disease onset in biopsies from 11 LCH-patients and four ADIFNGR1-patients. IFN-γR1 function was analyzed in 18 LCH-patients and 13 healthy controls by assessing the IFN-γ-induced upregulation of Fc-gamma-receptor I (FcγRI) expression on monocytes. Pro-inflammatory cytokine production was measured after stimulation of whole blood with LPS and IFN-γ. Exon 6 of the IFN-γR1 gene was sequenced in 67 LCH-patients to determine whether mutations were present. RESULTS: IFN-γR1 expression was high in three LCH-affected biopsies, similar to ADIFNGR1-affected biopsies, but varied from negative to moderate in eight other LCH-affected biopsies. No functional differences in IFN-γ signaling were detected between LCH-patients with active or non-active disease and healthy controls. No germline mutations in exon 6 of the IFN-γR1 gene were detected in any of the 67 LCH-patients. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to ADIFNGR1-patients, IFN-γ signaling is fully functional in LCH-patients. Either performed before, during or after treatment, these non-invasive functional assays can distinguish LCH-patients from ADIFNGR1-patients and thereby facilitate correct therapy regimens for patients with recurrent osteolytic lesions.
PURPOSE: Poly-ostotic Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) can be difficult to distinguish clinically and histologically from disseminated infection in manifesting specific subtypes of Mendelian Susceptibility to Mycobacterial Disease (MSMD). In MSMD-patients, dominant negative germline mutations in the IFN-γR1 gene, in particular in exon 6, lead to autosomal dominant IFN-γ receptor 1 deficiency (ADIFNGR1) and can mimic LCH. We hypothesized that similar defects might underlie the pathogenesis of LCH. METHODS: IFN-γR1 expression was immunohistochemically determined at disease onset in biopsies from 11 LCH-patients and four ADIFNGR1-patients. IFN-γR1 function was analyzed in 18 LCH-patients and 13 healthy controls by assessing the IFN-γ-induced upregulation of Fc-gamma-receptor I (FcγRI) expression on monocytes. Pro-inflammatory cytokine production was measured after stimulation of whole blood with LPS and IFN-γ. Exon 6 of the IFN-γR1 gene was sequenced in 67 LCH-patients to determine whether mutations were present. RESULTS: IFN-γR1 expression was high in three LCH-affected biopsies, similar to ADIFNGR1-affected biopsies, but varied from negative to moderate in eight other LCH-affected biopsies. No functional differences in IFN-γ signaling were detected between LCH-patients with active or non-active disease and healthy controls. No germline mutations in exon 6 of the IFN-γR1 gene were detected in any of the 67 LCH-patients. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to ADIFNGR1-patients, IFN-γ signaling is fully functional in LCH-patients. Either performed before, during or after treatment, these non-invasive functional assays can distinguish LCH-patients from ADIFNGR1-patients and thereby facilitate correct therapy regimens for patients with recurrent osteolytic lesions.
Authors: J D Edgar; A E Smyth; J Pritchard; D Lammas; E Jouanguy; R Hague; V Novelli; S Dempsey; L Sweeney; A J Taggart; D O'hara; J L Casanova; D S Kumararatne Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Edhyana Sahiratmadja; Bachti Alisjahbana; Tjitske de Boer; Iskandar Adnan; Anugrah Maya; Halim Danusantoso; Ronald H H Nelwan; Sangkot Marzuki; Jos W M van der Meer; Reinout van Crevel; Esther van de Vosse; Tom H M Ottenhoff Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: David A Lammas; E De Heer; J D Edgar; V Novelli; A Ben-Smith; R Baretto; P Drysdale; J Binch; C MacLennan; D S Kumararatne; S Panchalingam; T H M Ottenhoff; J-L Casanova; J F Emile Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Riccardo Haupt; Milen Minkov; Itziar Astigarraga; Eva Schäfer; Vasanta Nanduri; Rima Jubran; R Maarten Egeler; Gritta Janka; Dragan Micic; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Stefaan Van Gool; Johannes Visser; Sheila Weitzman; Jean Donadieu Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Agnieszka Bińczak-Kuleta; Aleksander Szwed; Mark R Walter; Maciej Kołban; Andrzej Ciechanowicz; Jeremy S C Clark Journal: Bosn J Basic Med Sci Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 3.363
Authors: H Jia; L Song; Q Cong; J Wang; H Xu; Y Chu; Q Li; Y Zhang; X Zou; C Zhang; Y E Chin; X Zhang; Z Li; K Zhu; B Wang; H Peng; Z Hou Journal: Oncogene Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Muhammad A Mir; Samith T Kochuparambil; Roshini S Abraham; Vilmarie Rodriguez; Matthew Howard; Amy P Hsu; Amie E Jackson; Steven M Holland; Mrinal M Patnaik Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Willemijn T Quispel; Janine A Stegehuis-Kamp; Laura Blijleven; Susy J Santos; Magda Lourda; Cor van den Bos; Astrid G S van Halteren; R Maarten Egeler Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Willemijn T Quispel; Eline C Steenwijk; Vincent van Unen; Susy J Santos; Lianne Koens; Reina Mebius; R Maarten Egeler; Astrid G S van Halteren Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Inge C de Vor; Pomme M van der Meulen; Vincent Bekker; Els M Verhard; Martijn H Breuning; Esther Harnisch; Maarten J D van Tol; Jantien W Wieringa; Esther van de Vosse; Robbert G M Bredius Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 8.317