OBJECTIVE: Dopamine transporter imaging with SPECT is a valuable tool for both clinical routine and research studies. Semi-quantitative analysis plays a key role in interpreting the scans, but is dependent on numerous factors, rotational radius being one of them. This study systematically evaluates the potential influence of radius of rotation on apparent tracer binding and describes methods for correction. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulation scans of a digital brain phantom with various disease states and various radii of rotation ranging from 13 to 30 cm were analyzed using 4 different methods of semi-quantification. Different volumes of interest as well as a method with partial volume correction were applied. RESULTS: For conventional 3D semi-quantification methods the decrease of measured striatal binding per cm additional radius rotation lied in the range between 2.5 and 3.1 %, whereas effects were negligible when applying recovery-corrected quantification. Effects were independent of disease state. CONCLUSION: Partial volume effects with increasing radius of rotation can lead to considerable decrease of measured binding ratios, particularly when applying dopamine transporter imaging in a research setting. Standardization of acquisition radius can avoid the effect; correction seems feasible, but the correction factors depend on the quantification approach applied.
OBJECTIVE:Dopamine transporter imaging with SPECT is a valuable tool for both clinical routine and research studies. Semi-quantitative analysis plays a key role in interpreting the scans, but is dependent on numerous factors, rotational radius being one of them. This study systematically evaluates the potential influence of radius of rotation on apparent tracer binding and describes methods for correction. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulation scans of a digital brain phantom with various disease states and various radii of rotation ranging from 13 to 30 cm were analyzed using 4 different methods of semi-quantification. Different volumes of interest as well as a method with partial volume correction were applied. RESULTS: For conventional 3D semi-quantification methods the decrease of measured striatal binding per cm additional radius rotation lied in the range between 2.5 and 3.1 %, whereas effects were negligible when applying recovery-corrected quantification. Effects were independent of disease state. CONCLUSION: Partial volume effects with increasing radius of rotation can lead to considerable decrease of measured binding ratios, particularly when applying dopamine transporter imaging in a research setting. Standardization of acquisition radius can avoid the effect; correction seems feasible, but the correction factors depend on the quantification approach applied.
Authors: Markus Wenzel; Fausto Milletari; Julia Krüger; Catharina Lange; Michael Schenk; Ivayla Apostolova; Susanne Klutmann; Marcus Ehrenburg; Ralph Buchert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-08-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Livia Tossici-Bolt; John C Dickson; Terez Sera; Jan Booij; Susanne Asenbaun-Nan; Maria C Bagnara; Thierry Vander Borght; Cathrine Jonsson; Robin de Nijs; Swen Hesse; Pierre M Koulibaly; Umit O Akdemir; Michel Koole; Klaus Tatsch; Andrea Varrone Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2017-01-28
Authors: Silvia Morbelli; Giuseppe Esposito; Javier Arbizu; Henryk Barthel; Ronald Boellaard; Nico I Bohnen; David J Brooks; Jacques Darcourt; John C Dickson; David Douglas; Alexander Drzezga; Jacob Dubroff; Ozgul Ekmekcioglu; Valentina Garibotto; Peter Herscovitch; Phillip Kuo; Adriaan Lammertsma; Sabina Pappata; Iván Peñuelas; John Seibyl; Franck Semah; Livia Tossici-Bolt; Elsmarieke Van de Giessen; Koen Van Laere; Andrea Varrone; Michele Wanner; George Zubal; Ian Law Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jim J Lloyd; George Petrides; Paul C Donaghy; Sean J Colloby; Johannes Attems; John T O'Brien; Gemma Roberts; Alan J Thomas Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Ralph Buchert; Catharina Lange; Timo S Spehl; Ivayla Apostolova; Lars Frings; Cathrine Jonsson; Philipp T Meyer; Sabine Hellwig Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Jonathan C Taylor; Nicholas Vennart; Ian Negus; Robin Holmes; Oliver Bandmann; Christine Lo; John Fenner Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.690