Literature DB >> 24253995

The precision and accuracy of U.S. environmental impact statements.

P J Culhane1.   

Abstract

A post-project audit was conducted of 239 impacts forecast in an representative cross-section of 29 U.S. environmental impact statements. Results must be qualified because of the imprecision of EIS forecasts and the quality of data available to a retrospective evaluator. Relatively few forecasts were found to be inaccurate and even fewer unanticipated impacts were identified. However, only 30% of the impacts were unqualifiedly close to their forecasts, with almost as many rated accurate principally by virtue of the vagueness of the forecasts.

Year:  1987        PMID: 24253995     DOI: 10.1007/BF00404266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Follow-up to environmental impact assessment: Learning from the Canadian Government experience.

Authors:  D R McCallum
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia.

Authors:  R Buckley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The need for long-term stream monitoring programs in forest ecosystems of the Pacific Northwest.

Authors:  R C Wissmar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.513

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.