Jin You1, Qian Lu. 1. Department of Psychology, Wuhan University, Luojiashan, Wuchang, Hubei, 430072, China, youjin1002@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Social support has shown to improve adjustment among cancer survivors. However, it is unclear how health benefits of social support depend on the source of support, age, and gender. Chinese culture emphasizes relationship harmony and interdependence, providing a unique opportunity to address these questions. This study investigated how support from different sources was associated with adjustment to cancer and how the association was moderated by gender and age. METHODS: Chinese cancer survivors (N = 238) from Beijing completed a questionnaire packet assessing support from different sources (e.g., family, friends, special others, society, and cancer organization) and adjustment (e.g., quality of life and positive and negative affect). RESULTS: Perceived support from family was greater than support from other sources among Chinese cancer survivors. After controlling for support from other sources, greater support from family and society was associated with higher quality of life, more positive affect, and less negative affect. Support from family showed a stronger negative correlation with negative affect among males, and support from special others showed a stronger negative correlation with negative affect among females. Support from society had a stronger positive association with quality of life, and support from friends had a stronger negative association with quality of life among younger survivors than among older survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that health benefits of social support depend on the source of support, gender, and age among Chinese cancer survivors. The study has implications for delivering individualized healthcare services tailored to the preferences of cancer survivors based on their cultural backgrounds and demographic characteristics.
INTRODUCTION: Social support has shown to improve adjustment among cancer survivors. However, it is unclear how health benefits of social support depend on the source of support, age, and gender. Chinese culture emphasizes relationship harmony and interdependence, providing a unique opportunity to address these questions. This study investigated how support from different sources was associated with adjustment to cancer and how the association was moderated by gender and age. METHODS: Chinese cancer survivors (N = 238) from Beijing completed a questionnaire packet assessing support from different sources (e.g., family, friends, special others, society, and cancer organization) and adjustment (e.g., quality of life and positive and negative affect). RESULTS: Perceived support from family was greater than support from other sources among Chinese cancer survivors. After controlling for support from other sources, greater support from family and society was associated with higher quality of life, more positive affect, and less negative affect. Support from family showed a stronger negative correlation with negative affect among males, and support from special others showed a stronger negative correlation with negative affect among females. Support from society had a stronger positive association with quality of life, and support from friends had a stronger negative association with quality of life among younger survivors than among older survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that health benefits of social support depend on the source of support, gender, and age among Chinese cancer survivors. The study has implications for delivering individualized healthcare services tailored to the preferences of cancer survivors based on their cultural backgrounds and demographic characteristics.
Authors: Meirav Dagan; Robbert Sanderman; Marike C Schokker; Theo Wiggers; Peter C Baas; Michiel van Haastert; Mariët Hagedoorn Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2011-04
Authors: Qian Lu; Nelson Yeung; Jenny Man; Matthew W Gallagher; Qiao Chu; Sidra H Deen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Krystal Warmoth; Nelson C Y Yeung; Jing Xie; Hannah Feng; Alice Loh; Lucy Young; Qian Lu Journal: Behav Med Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 3.104
Authors: Heleen C Melissant; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 3.603