| Literature DB >> 24253338 |
Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer1, Anjeung Kang Bellin, Sevgi Tercanli, Olav Lapaire, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most aggressive gynecologic malignancy, with a 5-year survival rate ranging around 40%. A crucial factor influencing the prognosis is early detection of a suspicious mass and referral to a gynecologic oncology center for further diagnosis, staging and debulking surgery. Here, we present the different imaging methods ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging, computer tomography (CT) and 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT that are used for the characterization, diagnosis, staging and surveillance of ovarian cancer. In this review, we focus on US and discuss in detail the advantages and the limitations, as well as the appropriate indications for each of the individual imaging techniques.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24253338 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-3081-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet ISSN: 0932-0067 Impact factor: 2.344