Literature DB >> 24253242

Interference from heterophilic antibodies in D-dimer assessment. A case report.

Giuseppe Lippi1, Luigi Ippolito, Maria Teresa Tondelli, Emmanuel J Favaloro.   

Abstract

We describe the case of a 3-year-old girl, admitted to the pediatric ward for three repeated episodes of severe migraine associated with vertigo, with onset 1 week after complete remission from an episode of chicken pox (i.e., varicella-zoster virus infection). All radiological and laboratory examinations were normal, except for a markedly elevated value of D-dimer (i.e. 8998 ng/ml; local reference range: < 243 ng/ml), measured with a commercial latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay. After physical and Doppler ultrasound examination, possible presence of thrombosis was ruled out, and the patient was discharged. In the following year, however, her plasma D-dimer values always remained frankly elevated, so that an analytical interference was suspected. A plasma sample was treated with a specific heterophilic antibodies blocking reagent and then assayed along with the untreated sample, with these showing a marked discrepancy of D-dimer values, that is 232 versus 2877 ng/ml. These results, highly indicative for the presence of heterophilic antibodies, are discussed in the light of the serious challenges that this type of analytical interference may pose on quality and reliability of D-dimer testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24253242     DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.276


  4 in total

1.  What makes D-dimer assays suspicious-heterophilic antibodies?

Authors:  Ying Wu; Ying-Xiu Xiao; Teng-Yi Huang; Xian-Yan Zhang; Huan-Bing Zhou; Xue-Xuan Zhang; Ying-E Wu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Analytical performance of a new immunoturbidimetric D-dimer assay and comparison with available assays.

Authors:  Laurie Talon; Virginie Fourneyron; Alexandre Trapani; Bruno Pereira; Thomas Sinegre; Aurélien Lebreton
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-02-06

3.  Identification of and solution for false D-dimer results.

Authors:  Xian-Yan Zhang; Xue-Xuan Zhang; Jia-Long Xu; Teng-Yi Huang; Ying Wu; Ye-Ru Yang; Huan-Bin Zhou; Ying-E Wu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Interference of D-dimer levels from heterophilic antibody in COVID-19: A serious concern in treatment and follow-up of patients.

Authors:  Demircan Ozbalci; Duygu Kumbul Doguc; Gulruhsar Yilmaz; Onder Ozturk; Fevziye Burcu Sirin; Fusun Zeynep Akcam
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.450

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.