Rodrigo Stanislawczuk1, Fabiane Pereira2, Miguel Angel Muñoz1, Issis Luque1, Paulo Vitor Farago3, Alessandra Reis2, Alessandro D Loguercio4. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil; Department of Restorative, Dentistry, Center of High Education of Campos Gerais, Ponta Grossa, Brazil. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil. 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil. 4. Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil. Electronic address: aloguercio@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of addition of diacetate CHX in different concentrations into two simplified etch-and-rinse (ER) adhesive systems (XP Bond [XP] and Ambar {AM}) on the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), degree of conversion (DC), 60-day cumulative water sorption (WS), solubility (SO) and CHX release (CR) as well as the immediate (IM) and 1-year (1Y) resin-dentine bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL). METHODS: Ten experimental adhesive systems were formulated according to the addition of CHX diacetate (0 [control], 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2%) in the two ER. For UTS and DC, specimens were constructed and tested after 24h. For WS, SO and CR, after specimens build-up, they were stored in water and the properties measured after 60 days. The occlusal enamel of fifty molars was removed and the adhesives were applied in dentine surface after 37% phosphoric acid etching. After composite resin build-ups, specimens were longitudinally sectioned to obtain resin-dentine bonded sticks (0.8mm(2)). Specimens were tested in tension at 0.5mm/min in the IM or 1Y. For NL, 2 bonded sticks from each tooth were prepared and analyzed under SEM. The data were submitted to appropriate statistical analysis (α=0.05). RESULTS: The addition of CHX did not influence UTS, DC, WS and SO (p<0.05). Higher CR was observed in adhesives with higher concentration of CHX (p<0.05). After 1Y, significant reductions of μTBS and increases of NL were observed in the control groups (p<0.05). Reductions of μTBS and increase of NL over time were not observed (AM) for CHX-containing adhesives or it was less pronounced than the control (XP) regardless of the CHX concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CHX diacetate in concentrations until 0.2% in the simplified ER adhesive systems may be an alternative to increase the long-term stability of resin-dentine interfaces, without jeopardizing the adhesives' mechanical properties evaluated.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of addition of diacetate CHX in different concentrations into two simplified etch-and-rinse (ER) adhesive systems (XP Bond [XP] and Ambar {AM}) on the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), degree of conversion (DC), 60-day cumulative water sorption (WS), solubility (SO) and CHX release (CR) as well as the immediate (IM) and 1-year (1Y) resin-dentine bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL). METHODS: Ten experimental adhesive systems were formulated according to the addition of CHX diacetate (0 [control], 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2%) in the two ER. For UTS and DC, specimens were constructed and tested after 24h. For WS, SO and CR, after specimens build-up, they were stored in water and the properties measured after 60 days. The occlusal enamel of fifty molars was removed and the adhesives were applied in dentine surface after 37% phosphoric acid etching. After composite resin build-ups, specimens were longitudinally sectioned to obtain resin-dentine bonded sticks (0.8mm(2)). Specimens were tested in tension at 0.5mm/min in the IM or 1Y. For NL, 2 bonded sticks from each tooth were prepared and analyzed under SEM. The data were submitted to appropriate statistical analysis (α=0.05). RESULTS: The addition of CHX did not influence UTS, DC, WS and SO (p<0.05). Higher CR was observed in adhesives with higher concentration of CHX (p<0.05). After 1Y, significant reductions of μTBS and increases of NL were observed in the control groups (p<0.05). Reductions of μTBS and increase of NL over time were not observed (AM) for CHX-containing adhesives or it was less pronounced than the control (XP) regardless of the CHX concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CHX diacetate in concentrations until 0.2% in the simplified ER adhesive systems may be an alternative to increase the long-term stability of resin-dentine interfaces, without jeopardizing the adhesives' mechanical properties evaluated.
Authors: Sabrina A Feitosa; Jadesada Palasuk; Saulo Geraldeli; Lester Jack Windsor; Marco C Bottino Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Ana Beatriz Silva Sousa; Cristina M P Vidal; Ariene Arcas Leme-Kraus; Fernanda C P Pires-de-Souza; Ana K Bedran-Russo Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Luiz Filipe Barbosa-Martins; Jossaria Pereira de Sousa; Lívia Araújo Alves; Robert Philip Wynn Davies; Regina Maria Puppin-Rontanti Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.623