| Literature DB >> 24252600 |
Henrietta M Nielsen1, Danyal Ek, Una Avdic, Camilla Orbjörn, Oskar Hansson, Robert Veerhuis, Annemieke Jm Rozemuller, Arne Brun, Lennart Minthon, Malin Wennström.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuron Glial 2 (NG2) cells are glial cells known to serve as oligodendrocyte progenitors as well as modulators of the neuronal network. Altered NG2 cell morphology and up-regulation as well as increased shedding of the proteoglycan NG2 expressed on the cell surface have been described in rodent models of brain injury. Here we describe alterations in the human NG2 cell population in response to pathological changes characteristic of Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24252600 PMCID: PMC4046664 DOI: 10.1186/2051-5960-1-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Demographics and characteristics of postmortem examined individuals
| NBB (no) | Clinical diagnosis | Gender (M/F) | Age (years) | PMDa(hours) | Fixation (hours) | Braak (NFT) | Braak (Aβ) | Braak (LB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | AD | F | 71 | 6.26 | 24 | 5 | C | 0 |
| 37 | AD | F | 64 | 6.44 | 19 | 4 | C | 0 |
| 12 | AD | F | 87 | 6.42 | 17 | 4 | C | 0 |
| 78 | AD | M | 83 | 6.22 | 16 | 3 | B | 0 |
| 59 | ND | F | 84 | 7.65 | 20 | 2 | B | 0 |
| 39 | ND | F | 91 | 4.15 | 20 | 1 | B | 0 |
| 49 | ND | F | 83 | 4.40 | 14 | 1 | B | 0 |
| 81 | ND | M | 55 | 7.30 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 76 | ND | F | 75 | 6.75 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
NFT = neurofibrillary tangles, LB = Lewy body, AD = Alzheimer’s disease, ND = Non-demented control, PMD = post mortem delay.
Qualitative assessment of NG2 cell reactivity, Aβ plaques and glial nests in post-mortem brain tissue
| NBB (No) | Amyloid plaque (score)1 | Microglia nest (score)2 | NG2 cells (IHSI score)3 | Granular NG2 (%)4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD 2 | (++++) | (++++) | (+) | 100 |
| AD 37 | (+++) | (++++) | (++) | 100 |
| AD 12 | (++++) | (++++) | (+) | 100 |
| AD 78 | (++) | (+) | (+++) | 50 |
| ND 59 | (++) | (++) | (++++) | 50 |
| ND 39 | (+) | (+) | (+++++) | 43 |
| ND 49 | (+) | (+++) | (++++) | 37 |
| ND 81 |
| (++) | (+++) | 5 |
| ND 76 | - | - | (++++) | 5 |
1 Plaque load is indicated either as (−) no Aβ plaques visible, or (+) low (++) moderate (+++) high and (++++) very high numbers of Aβ plaques.
2 Microglia nests are indicated either as (−) no visible, or (+) low, (++) moderate and (++++) very high numbers of glial nests.
3 B5 IHSI intensity of NG2 cells is scored as (−) no visible NG2 cells (+) very weak, (++) weak, (+++) moderate (++++) strong and (+++++) very strong IHSI. R indicates the presence of more than 50% NG2 cells with reactive morphology. r indicate the presence of less than 50% reactive NG2 cells.
4 Percentage (%) cells with granular NG2 of total counted cells positive for NG2.stained with 9.2.27 and N143.8.
Figure 1Microscopic images of NG2 positive cells. A-C show low magnification pictures of brain tissue with (A) resting NG2 cells, (B) reactive NG2 cells and (C) granular NG2 (arrowhead) as well as pericytes (arrow). D-F show higher magnification images of a resting NG2 cell (D), reactive NG2 cell (E), granular NG2 (F), G-H show images of reactive NG2 cells (G) and granular NG2 (H) (brown) adjacent to Aβ plaque (purple), (I) shows Aβ deposits in the investigated hippocampal molecular layer (ML) of an AD patient. Scale bar A-C =150 μm, D-F=10 μm, G, H=25 μm and I=10 μm.
Demographic data of individuals with antemortem CSF assessment
| Characteristics | Control (n=36) | AD (n=47) |
|---|---|---|
| M/F (n) | 17 / 19 | 13 / 34 |
| Age at investigation (yrs) | 61 ± 9 | *** 77 ± 7 |
| MMSE | 28 ± 1 | *** 20 ± 4 |
| APOEϵ4 carriers (%)1,# | 31 | 77 |
| Aβ1–42 (ng/L) | 659 ± 230 | *** 355 ± 100 |
| T-Tau (ng/L) | 279 ± 136 | *** 821 ± 322 |
| P-Tau (ng/L)2 | 47 ± 19 | *** 104 ± 39 |
| NG2 (μg/ml)3 | 1.90 ± 0.07 | *1.63 ± 0. 06 |
Data are presented as mean± SD. 1Data missing on n=2 control. 2 Data missing on n=2 control, n=10 AD. # Individuals carrying one or two APOEϵ4 alleles. *** Indicates a significant difference at the p<0.001 level compared to controls using ANOVA. 3Results are age-adjusted. * Indicates a significant difference at the p<0.05 level compared to controls using ANCOVA.
Figure 2Images of double staining against NG2 (clone 9.2.27)/GFAP and NG2 (clone 9.2.27)/Iba-1. (A) Co-localisation between GFAP+ astrocyte (red) and granular NG2 (green). (B) No co-localisation between iba-1+ microglia (red) and granular NG2 (green). C-E represent images of an NG2 and GFAP staining in a higher magnification, where (C) shows both ramified (arrow) and clustered (arrowhead) NG2, (D) shows a GFAP+ astrocyte and (E) a merged picture of the two stainings. F-G represent images of NG2 and Iba-1 stainings in a higher magnification where (F) shows ramified NG2 cells (arrowhead), (G) Iba-1+ microglia and (H) a merged picture of the two stainings. Scale bar A, B=20 μm and C-H=15 μm.
Figure 3Fluorescence micrographs of NG2+HOPCs stained for NG2. Images show A) NG2+HOPCs after 18 h exposure to 10 μM Aβ1–42 oligomers. B) NG2+HOPCs after 18 h exposure to Aβ1–42 oligomer vehicle. C) NG2+HOPCs after 18 h exposure to 10 μM Aβ1–42 fibrils. D) NG2+HOPCs after 18 h exposure to Aβ1–42 fibril vehicle Scale bar = 25 μm.
Figure 4Changes in NG2 levels (% of vehicle) in cell culture supernatants and cell lysates after exposure to 10μM Aβ1–42 oligomers and 10 μM Aβ1–42 fibrils for 18 h. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. Data was analyzed with paired t-test. * indicates a significant difference at p< 0.05 level compared to baseline ** indicates a significant difference at p< 0.01 level compared to baseline.