Literature DB >> 24252574

Nailing of three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head -- long-term results.

Martin Kloub1, Karel Holub2, Simona Polakova3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Long term outcome of the treatment of displaced complex fractures of humeral head is rare in the literature especially in greater cohorts. Main purpose of our study was the assessment of long term results of intramedullary nailing of 3-4 part fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 137 patients with 137 three or four-part fractures of the humeral head treated by intramedullary nailing were reassessed after an average follow-up time of 57 (27-93) months. The whole cohort consisted of 85 three-part fractures, 38 four-part fractures and 14 fracture-dislocations. Radiographic and clinical outcome - absolute Constant score (CS(abs)) and relative Constant score (compared to the contralateral side - CS(rel)) were evaluated. The rate of complications was recorded. Analysis of the influence of quality of achieved reduction on final functional result and on the development of complications was performed.
RESULTS: 125 fractures healed uneventfully. Mean long term CS(rel) was 81% of the unaffected side. Mean CS(rel) was 85% in 3-part fractures, 73% in four-part fractures, 80% in three-part fracture-dislocations and 70% in four-part fracture-dislocations. 96 (70%) patients achieved excellent or good results (CS(rel) higher than 80%), 17 (12.4%) satisfactory results and 24 (17.5%) poor results (CS(rel) less than 60%). No significant difference was observed in functional results between different age groups. No incidence of non-union was observed, 4 losses of reduction were encountered. We observed 17 cases of complete humeral head necrosis, 14 of them in the group of 4-part fractures. Reduction quality strongly influenced functional result and development of head necrosis. In the group of excellent reduction mean CS(rel) was 88% and the rate of necrosis was 2%. Moderate reduction quality deteriorated CS(rel) to 70% and head necrosis rate rose up to 28%. If reduction was poor, mean CS(rel) was 52% and the rate of complete necrosis rose to 60%.
CONCLUSION: Long term results confirmed nailing as appropriate treatment strategy for all types of humeral head fractures with limitation of excellent reduction in every age group. Moderate or even poor reduction significantly deteriorates functional results and increases rate of complete necrosis of the humeral head. If good reduction cannot be achieved, treatment strategy should be changed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3–4 part fractures; Antegrade nail fixation; Humeral head fractures; Influence of the quality of reduction; Long term result; Osteonecrosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24252574     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Proximal humeral nail for treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population: effective and safe in experienced hands.

Authors:  Arie Greenberg; Philip J Rosinsky; Nir Gafni; Yona Kosashvili; Alexander Kaban
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-19

2.  Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail.

Authors:  Greta Lorenz; Wolfgang Schönthaler; Wolfgang Huf; Micha Komjati; Christian Fialka; Sandra Boesmueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Multifragmentary dislocated humeral head fracture-A case report of a successful head preserving treatment strategy despite delayed presentation.

Authors:  Matthias Bungartz; Georg Matziolis; Sebastian Rohe; Olaf Brinkmann
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-29

4.  Calcar screws and adequate reduction reduced the risk of fixation failure in proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate: 190 patients followed for a mean of 3 years.

Authors:  Sjur Oppebøen; Annette K B Wikerøy; Hendrik F S Fuglesang; Filip C Dolatowski; Per-Henrik Randsborg
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Humeral Head Replacement in the Treatment of Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture.

Authors:  Xinghuo Zhang; Yakui Zhang; Tao Guo; Liang Liu; Wenhao Cheng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Anatomic evaluation of radiographic landmarks for accurate straight antegrade intramedullary nail placement in the humerus.

Authors:  Peter S Johnston; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Yahia M Tagouri; Douglas Curran-Everett; Benjamin W Sears
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 7.  Predictors of outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Abbot; Susanna Proudman; Bhuvanesh Ravichandran; Nicole Williams
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.917

Review 8.  Outcomes of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason Wong; Jared M Newman; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.