Literature DB >> 24251881

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humans.

M L Dirks1, B T Wall, T Snijders, C L P Ottenbros, L B Verdijk, L J C van Loon.   

Abstract

AIM: Short periods of muscle disuse, due to illness or injury, result in substantial skeletal muscle atrophy. Recently, we have shown that a single session of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) increases muscle protein synthesis rates. The aim was to investigate the capacity for daily NMES to attenuate muscle atrophy during short-term muscle disuse.
METHODS: Twenty-four healthy, young (23 ± 1 year) males participated in the present study. Volunteers were subjected to 5 days of one-legged knee immobilization with (NMES; n = 12) or without (CON; n = 12) supervised NMES sessions (40-min sessions, twice daily). Two days prior to and immediately after the immobilization period, CT scans and single-leg one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength tests were performed to assess quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and leg muscle strength respectively. Furthermore, muscle biopsies were taken to assess muscle fibre CSA, satellite cell content and mRNA and protein expression of selected genes.
RESULTS: In CON, immobilization reduced quadriceps CSA by 3.5 ± 0.5% (P < 0.0001) and muscle strength by 9 ± 2% (P < 0.05). In contrast, no significant muscle loss was detected following immobilization in NMES although strength declined by 7 ± 3% (P < 0.05). Muscle MAFbx and MuRF1 mRNA expression increased following immobilization in CON (P < 0.001 and P = 0.07 respectively), whereas levels either declined (P < 0.01) or did not change in NMES, respectively. Immobilization led to an increase in muscle myostatin mRNA expression in CON (P < 0.05), but remained unchanged in NMES.
CONCLUSION: During short-term disuse, NMES represents an effective interventional strategy to prevent the loss of muscle mass, but it does not allow preservation of muscle strength. NMES during disuse may be of important clinical relevance in both health and disease.
© 2013 Scandinavian Physiological Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disuse atrophy; immobilization; neuromuscular electrical stimulation; skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24251881     DOI: 10.1111/apha.12200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)        ISSN: 1748-1708            Impact factor:   6.311


  59 in total

Review 1.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Skeletal Muscle Loading Changes its Regenerative Capacity.

Authors:  Eduardo Teixeira; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Skeletal Muscle Disuse Atrophy and the Rehabilitative Role of Protein in Recovery from Musculoskeletal Injury.

Authors:  Emily E Howard; Stefan M Pasiakos; Maya A Fussell; Nancy R Rodriguez
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Effects of post-fracture non-weight-bearing immobilization on muscle atrophy, intramuscular and intermuscular adipose tissues in the thigh and calf.

Authors:  Akito Yoshiko; Koun Yamauchi; Takayuki Kato; Koji Ishida; Teruhiko Koike; Yoshiharu Oshida; Hiroshi Akima
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Electrical stimulation prevents doxorubicin-induced atrophy and mitochondrial loss in cultured myotubes.

Authors:  Blas A Guigni; Dennis K Fix; Joseph J Bivona; Bradley M Palmer; James A Carson; Michael J Toth
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Combined with Protein Ingestion Preserves Thigh Muscle Mass But Not Muscle Function in Healthy Older Adults During 5 Days of Bed Rest.

Authors:  Paul T Reidy; Alec I McKenzie; Preston Brunker; Daniel S Nelson; Katherine M Barrows; Mark Supiano; Paul C LaStayo; Micah J Drummond
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.663

7.  Impact of dairy protein during limb immobilization and recovery on muscle size and protein synthesis; a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Randall F D'Souza; Sarah M Mitchell; Vandre C Figueiredo; Benjamin F Miller; Karyn L Hamilton; Fredrick F Peelor; Marcelli Coronet; Chantal A Pileggi; Brenan Durainayagam; Aaron C Fanning; Sally D Poppitt; David Cameron-Smith
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-11-09

8.  Muscle-specific and age-related changes in protein synthesis and protein degradation in response to hindlimb unloading in rats.

Authors:  Leslie M Baehr; Daniel W D West; Andrea G Marshall; George R Marcotte; Keith Baar; Sue C Bodine
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-03-23

9.  Utility of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Preserve Quadriceps Muscle Fiber Size and Contractility After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Reconstruction: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Blinded Trial.

Authors:  Michael J Toth; Timothy W Tourville; Thomas B Voigt; Rebecca H Choquette; Bradley M Anair; Michael J Falcone; Mathew J Failla; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapslaey; Nathan K Endres; James R Slauterbeck; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Rehabilitation of a 23-year-old male after right knee arthroscopy and open reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with a tibialis anterior allograft: a case report.

Authors:  Scott Cheatham; Morey J Kolber; William J Hanney
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.