Literature DB >> 24251767

The relevance of time series in molecular ecology and conservation biology.

Jan C Habel1, Martin Husemann, Aline Finger, Patrick D Danley, Frank E Zachos.   

Abstract

The genetic structure of a species is shaped by the interaction of contemporary and historical factors. Analyses of individuals from the same population sampled at different points in time can help to disentangle the effects of current and historical forces and facilitate the understanding of the forces driving the differentiation of populations. The use of such time series allows for the exploration of changes at the population and intraspecific levels over time. Material from museum collections plays a key role in understanding and evaluating observed population structures, especially if large numbers of individuals have been sampled from the same locations at multiple time points. In these cases, changes in population structure can be assessed empirically. The development of new molecular markers relying on short DNA fragments (such as microsatellites or single nucleotide polymorphisms) allows for the analysis of long-preserved and partially degraded samples. Recently developed techniques to construct genome libraries with a reduced complexity and next generation sequencing and their associated analysis pipelines have the potential to facilitate marker development and genotyping in non-model species. In this review, we discuss the problems with sampling and available marker systems for historical specimens and demonstrate that temporal comparative studies are crucial for the estimation of important population genetic parameters and to measure empirically the effects of recent habitat alteration. While many of these analyses can be performed with samples taken at a single point in time, the measurements are more robust if multiple points in time are studied. Furthermore, examining the effects of habitat alteration, population declines, and population bottlenecks is only possible if samples before and after the respective events are included.
© 2013 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2013 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  adaptation; differentiation; effective population size; habitat history; population bottleneck; population fluctuations; population history; random genetic drift; selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24251767     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  15 in total

1.  A longitudinal genetic survey identifies temporal shifts in the population structure of Dutch house sparrows.

Authors:  L Cousseau; M Husemann; R Foppen; C Vangestel; L Lens
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Effective population size in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  M Husemann; F E Zachos; R J Paxton; J C Habel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The genetic consequences of captive breeding, environmental change and human exploitation in the endangered peninsular pronghorn.

Authors:  Anastasia Klimova; Jesus Neftalí Gutiérrez-Rivera; Victor Sánchez-Sotomayor; Joseph Ivan Hoffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Coupling Demographic and Genetic Variability from Archived Collections of European Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus).

Authors:  Paolo Ruggeri; Andrea Splendiani; Cristina Di Muri; Tatiana Fioravanti; Alberto Santojanni; Iole Leonori; Andrea De Felice; Ilaria Biagiotti; Piera Carpi; Enrico Arneri; Paola Nisi Cerioni; Massimo Giovannotti; Vincenzo Caputo Barucchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A century of temporal stability of genetic diversity in wild bumblebees.

Authors:  Kevin Maebe; Ivan Meeus; Sarah Vray; Thomas Claeys; Wouter Dekoninck; Jean-Luc Boevé; Pierre Rasmont; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Spatial and temporal genetic dynamics of the grasshopper Oedaleus decorus revealed by museum genomics.

Authors:  Sarah Schmid; Samuel Neuenschwander; Camille Pitteloud; Gerald Heckel; Mila Pajkovic; Raphaël Arlettaz; Nadir Alvarez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Evaluating hybridization capture with RAD probes as a tool for museum genomics with historical bird specimens.

Authors:  Ethan B Linck; Zachary R Hanna; Anna Sellas; John P Dumbacher
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  A river runs through it: The causes, consequences, and management of intraspecific diversity in river networks.

Authors:  Simon Blanchet; Jérôme G Prunier; Ivan Paz-Vinas; Keoni Saint-Pé; Olivier Rey; Allan Raffard; Eglantine Mathieu-Bégné; Géraldine Loot; Lisa Fourtune; Vincent Dubut
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  DNA Quantity and Quality in Remnants of Traffic-Killed Specimens of an Endangered Longhorn Beetle: A Comparison of Different Methods.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Sylvain Ursenbacher; Armin Coray; Urs Weibel; Bruno Baur
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  SNPs across time and space: population genomic signatures of founder events and epizootics in the House Finch (Haemorhous mexicanus).

Authors:  Allison J Shultz; Allan J Baker; Geoffrey E Hill; Paul M Nolan; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.