Literature DB >> 24251214

Can a faulty injection technique lead to a localized insulin allergy?

Trinanjan Sanyal1, Sujoy Ghosh, Subhankar Chowdhury, Satinath Mukherjee.   

Abstract

Insulin allergy is a rare occurrence which can present diagnostic and management dilemmas for the clinician. Three types of reaction have been reported: Localized, generalized (systemic), and insulin resistance. All need to be considered in cases of suspected insulin allergy. Adverse reactions to insulin have significantly decreased since the introduction of recombinant human insulin preparations. However, cases with insulin allergy continues to present in the clinic. Symptoms range from local injection site reactions to severe generalized anaphylactic reactions. The case study presented here describes an event of suspected insulin allergy arising out of faulty insulin injection technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antigen presenting cells; insulin; insulin allergy; insulin injection technique

Year:  2013        PMID: 24251214      PMCID: PMC3830360          DOI: 10.4103/2230-8210.119621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 2230-9500


INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous injection of insulin is an effective means of controlling blood glucose levels in patients with type 1 diabetes and many with type 2 diabetes. There are sporadic reports of insulin allergy in the literature, particularly to the ‘older’ insulins of animal origin, such as neutral protein Hagedorn (NPH), protamine zinc insulin (PZI), and biphasic insulins. Localized allergic reactions are the most frequently reported and are thought to occur as a result of the impurities contained in the older insulins; particularly proinsulin, C-peptide, and other peptides.[123] More recently, allergies to the insulin components protamine, metacresol, and phenol have been reported in a series of five patients.[4] Localized reactions to insulin still occur in 5% of patients receiving insulin, despite it now being available in a highly purified state and having the same molecular structure as human insulin.[5] We suggest that the localized urticarial lesions developed at insulin injection sites in our studied case is most likely due to insulin allergy arising out of faulty injection technique.

CASE REPORT

Patient is a 38-year-old female diagnosed as a case of diabetes mellitus (DM) presented with neuropathic symptoms in a clinic outside our hospital with an initial fasting plasma glucose (FPG): 256 mg/dl, postprandial plasma glucose (PPG): 426 mg/dl. She was put onto inj. premixed insulin (30/70) 12 IU before breakfast and 6 IU before dinner along with metformin 500 mg twice daily after meals (BDPC). A standard 1,200 kCal/day, diabetic diet, and exercise were also advised. She presented to our outpatient department (OPD) 2 months later with a complain of redness and itching at the injection site after administration of insulin (noticed for last 3-4 month after she changed her insulin brand), and burning sensation in both feet specially during the night. She had no family history of DM, no significant past illness (including bronchial asthma), no history of any drug/food allergy. Insulin was administered by her 20-year-old daughter, and she never practiced self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). On examination, her body mass index (BMI) was 22.37 kg/m2, she had no acanthosis nigricans/skin tag. Other general and systemic examinations revealed no abnormality. She had no sensory loss on 10-g monofilament test and normal ankle brachial index (ABI) values. But her insulin injection sites (over abdomen and thighs) showed multiple pigmented areas with small scars and few urticarial patches [Figures 1 and 2]. She had no lipoatrophy or lipohypertrophy at the injection site.
Figure 1

Abdomen site of injection showing hypertrophy and scars

Figure 2

Injection site of thigh showing scars

Abdomen site of injection showing hypertrophy and scars Injection site of thigh showing scars Her investigations revealed complete blood count (CBC) within normal limit, serum (Sr.) creatinine 0.9 mg/dl, Sr. lipid parameters within normal limit, ultrasonography (USG) abdomen was normal, and present glycemic status: FPG = 201 mg/dl and PPG = 310 mg/dl. When her daughter was enquired about the insulin injection technique, she demonstrated a faulty technique. She used to insert the needle horizontally (not vertically) with the plane of skinfold making an intradermal injection instead of a subcutaneous one [Figure 3].
Figure 3

Faulty method of injection

Faulty method of injection

DISCUSSION

Repeated intradermal insulin injection led to multiple small scarring with pigmentation of the insulin injection site due to local inflammation. Poor glycemic control was due to poor insulin absorption from dermis, and probably a localized insulin allergy manifested as urticarial lesions. The insulin allergy may be explained by presence of plenty of antigen presenting Langerhans cells in the epidermis which may augment presentation of antigenic components of the human insulin such as metacresol and phenol, which acting as haptens can mediate a localized immune response.[6] However, a local skin biopsy and more sophisticated immunological parameters are required to establish this hypothesis. Our patient was then educated regarding the correct subcutaneous insulin injection technique and after 1 month, on her next visit, her insulin injection sites were found to be absolutely normal and healthy and good glycemic control was achieved.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Epidermal Langerhans cell migration and sensitisation to chemical allergens.

Authors:  Marie Cumberbatch; Rebecca J Dearman; Christopher E M Griffiths; Ian Kimber
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Resistance and allergy to recombinant human insulin.

Authors:  M A Ganz; T Unterman; M Roberts; R Uy; S Sahgal; M Samter; L C Grammer
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Treatment of allergy to heterologous monocomponent insulin with human semisynthetic insulin. Long-term study.

Authors:  B Bruni; P Barolo; A Blatto; M Carlini; S G Ansaldi; G Grassi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Insulin allergy: clinical manifestations and management strategies.

Authors:  L Heinzerling; K Raile; H Rochlitz; T Zuberbier; M Worm
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 13.146

5.  Insulin allergy and resistance successfully treated by desensitisation with Aspart insulin.

Authors:  Victor Matheu; Eva Perez; Marta Hernández; Elisa Díaz; Ricardo Darias; Abel González; Jose C García; Inmaculada Sánchez; Laura Feliciano; Agueda Caballero; Fernando de la Torre
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2005-12-23
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Insulin Injection Site Adverse Effect in a Type 1 Diabetes Patient: An Unusual Presentation.

Authors:  Ranjana Ajit Sahasrabudhe; Tejas Yashwant Limaye; Vidya Sanjay Gokhale
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Diabetes Mellitus with Poor Glycemic Control as a Consequence of Inappropriate Injection Technique.

Authors:  Ramesh Sharma Poudel; Shakti Shrestha; Sushma Bhandari; Rano Mal Piryani; Shital Adhikari
Journal:  Case Rep Endocrinol       Date:  2018-04-01

3.  Faulty Injection Technique: A Preventable But Often Overlooked Factor in Insulin Allergy.

Authors:  Partha Pratim Chakraborty; Sugata Narayan Biswas; Shinjan Patra
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  Assessment of Insulin Injection Practice among Diabetes Patients in a Tertiary Healthcare Centre in Nepal: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Ramesh Sharma Poudel; Shakti Shrestha; Rano Mal Piryani; Bijaya Basyal; Kalpana Kaucha; Shital Adhikari
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 4.011

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.