Literature DB >> 24250893

The effect of body fat mass and fat free mass on migraine headache.

Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi1, Maryam Abolhasani, Alipasha Meysamie, Mansoureh Togha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity seems to be associated to migraine headache. Increase in body fat, especially in gluteofemoral region, elevates adiponectin and leptin secretion which in turn impair inflammatory processes that could be contributing to migraine risk. This study was designed to assess the relationship between body composition and risk of migraine for the first time.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 1510 middle-aged women who were visited in a weight reduction clinic of university were recruited. Migraine was diagnosed with HIS criteria. Body composition parameters including total fat mass (FATM), total fat free mass (FFM), truncal fat mass (TFATM), and truncal fat free mass (TFFM) was assessed using bioelectric impedance. We further assessed cardiovascular risk factors and smoking as confounding factors. To determine the real association between different variables and risk of migraine, the associations were adjusted by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Elevation in fasting blood sugar, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, FFM, TFFM, and waist-to-hip ratio increased the risk of migraine. When the associations were adjusted for other factors, only the association between migraine and FFM remained statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Lower FFM increased the risk of migraine in overweight and obese individuals. In the other words, higher fat free mass could be a protective factor for migraine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fat Free Mass; Migraine; Obesity; Truncal Fat Free Mass

Year:  2013        PMID: 24250893      PMCID: PMC3829270     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Neurol        ISSN: 2008-384X


Introduction

Obesity is one of the major public health problems. The prevalence of obesity is increasing consistently worldwide.[1] In Iran, the prevalence of overweight and obesity were 57% in women and 42.8% in men.[2] Overweight and obese individuals are at increased risk for a variety of disease including metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, gout, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The association between migraine and obesity has also been reported.[3, 4] Studies also suggest a relationship between obesity and migraine frequency and severity as well as migraine features such as phonophobia and photophobia.[1] Subcutaneous fat, especially in the gluteofemoral region in women, seems to increase leptin and adiponectin secretion. Leptin and adiponectin elevation in turn impairs insulin sensitivity and mediates inflammatory process attributed to migraine risk.[5] The evidences about the relationship between body composition (fat mass/fat free mass) and migraine are rare. Current study was designed to assess the relationship between migraine and body composition in overweight and obese individuals.

Materials and Methods

Study population

This was a cross-sectional study among overweight and obese healthy women who were visited for weight reduction in Obesity Clinic of Sina University Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between February 2009 and March 2013. 1630 women were eligible to participate in this study. From these subjects, 1510 overweight and obese women with mean age of 38.5 ± 12.6 years accepted to participate. All women signed written informed consent. Thus a total of 1510 women with BMI ≥ 25 and history of the migraine headache were included in the study. 25 women with missing data of BMI or migraine headache were excluded.

Assessment of migraine

Migraine was diagnosed in accordance with the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. Patients with headache were classified as migraineurs if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) Headache attacks lasting 4–72 hours (< 4 hours was accepted for those who reported often visual disturbances before headache); (2) headache with at least one of the following characteristics: Pulsating quality, unilateral location or aggravation by physical activity; (3) presence of at least one of the following symptoms during headache: Nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia.

Anthropometric measurements

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using Seca 755 Dial Column Medical Scale. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a standard stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in square meters. BMI ≥ 25 was defined as overweight and BMI ≥ 30 was defined as obesity. Waist circumference was measured by the standard tape meter at the maximal narrowing of the waist from anterior view. Hip circumference was measured at the point of maximal gluteal protuberance from the lateral view. Waist-to-hip ratio was calculated through dividing the waist circumference by hip circumference. Body composition was measured by body composition analyzer type BC-418 MA TANITA. The participants were asked not to eat or drink within 4 hours, and not to exercise within 12 hours of the test. Participants were asked to void within 30 minutes left to the test (with empty bladder) and had minimal consumption of diuretic agents. The body composition analyzer measured total fat mass (FATM), total fat free mass (FFM), total body water, and segmental analysis for fat mass and fat free mass in trunk.

Cardiovascular risk factor assessment

Fasting blood sample was obtained to measure fasting blood sugar (FBS), total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL). Hyperglycemia was defined as having FBS ≥ 126 mg/dl. The patient was diagnosed with dyslipidemia if he/she had serum levels of total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL or LDL ≥ 160 mg/dL or HDL ≤ 40 mg/dL or was taking lipid lowering drugs. Blood pressure was measured for participant in a sitting position after a 10-minute rest, on the upper arm, using mercury sphygmomanometer (Richter™). Hypertension (HTN) was defined as having systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg. Smoking status was assessed through self-report. Smoking in past 6 months was defined as active smoking.

Statistical analysis

For descriptive analysis of quantitative data, the mean ± standard deviation was used. For qualitative data, frequency percentage was reported. To evaluate the association between migraine and risk factors odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. Finally, we used multivariable logistic regression analysis to control the effect of confounding factors. To determine the cut-off value of FATM, FFM, truncal fat mass (TFATM), and fat free mass (TFFM), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used with respect to BMI categories (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Cut-off points were considered as the number which represented the maximum of the square of specificity plus sensitivity. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data.

Results

Of the 1510 participants, a total of 320 (21.2%) were diagnosed with migraine. The participant's characteristics were summarized in Table 1. The independent variables were then categorized. For categorizing FATM, FFM, TFATM, and TFFM, cut-offs by ROC curves were applied (Figure 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of overweight and obese women participated in the study, categorized by having or not having migraine headache

MigraineursNon migraineurs

Mean ± SDMean ± SD
Age (year)38.4 ± 11.138.5 ± 12.9
Weight (Kg)88.9 ± 19.685.5 ± 19.1
Body mass index (Kg/m2)35.5 ± 8.334.2 ± 6.9
Waist-to-hip ratio0.86 ± 0.80.88 ± 0.8
Total fat mass (Kg)38.5 ± 13.136.2 ± 13.4
Total fat percentage42.1 ± 6.242.4 ± 13.4
Total fat free mass (Kg)50.5 ± 8.150.9 ± 6.9
Truncal fat percentage38.2 ± 6.036.7 ± 8.1
Truncal fat mass (Kg)17.8 ± 5.416.9 ± 6.1
Truncal fat free mass (Kg)27.8 ± 3.827.5 ± 3.5
Truncal predictive muscle mass (Kg)26.6 ± 3.726.3 ± 3.2
Truncal fat mass/truncal fat free mass0.6 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.2
Total body water (Kg)37.1 ± 5.736.6 ± 5.0
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)202.6 ± 39.2192.9 ± 44.3
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)121.6 ± 31.4115.5 ± 36.3
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)48.7 ± 11.447.3 ± 12.1
Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL)96.6 ± 20.2102.8 ± 30.9
Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of body composition parameters, according to body mass index categories BMI ≥ 30 was used as cut-off point. Cut-off points were considered as the number which represented the maximum amount of the sum of the square of sensitivity and specificity

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of body composition parameters, according to body mass index categories BMI ≥ 30 was used as cut-off point. Cut-off points were considered as the number which represented the maximum amount of the sum of the square of sensitivity and specificity Characteristics of overweight and obese women participated in the study, categorized by having or not having migraine headache The comparison of participants’ characteristics between migraineurs and non-migraineurs were presented in Table 2. Higher ratio of fat mass/fat free mass, truncal fat mass/truncal fat free mass, and volume of truncal fat mass were significantly associated with elevated risk of migraine. Except for FFM, the association between all the variables and migraine were attenuated after logistic regression analysis (Table 3).
Table 2

Association between migraine and biochemical, anthropometric, and other measured factors

With migraineWithout migraine

No./total No.PercentNo./total No.PercentOdds ratio (95% CI)P
Total cholesterol ≥ 126 mg/dL16/12061.963/47346.51.00 (0.56-1.81)0.997
HDL-cholesterol ≤ 40 mg/dL21/10220.6110/42020.20.73 (0.43-1.24)0.242
LDL-cholesterol ≥ 160 mg/dL11/10210.842/41310.21.07 (0.53-2.16)0.855
FBS ≥ 126 mg/dL22/13316.596/49019.60.81 (0.49-1.35)0.426
Waist-to-hip ratio < 0.88153/26857.1542/96157.11.03 (0.78-1.35)0.840
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 203/27874.1674/97868.91.22 (0.91-1.64)0.188
FATM ≥ 39.15 kg101/24241.7268/75435.51.30 (0.19-1.75)0.083
FFM ≤ 30.5 kg242/24399.5749/75499.31.62 (0.19-13.9)0.659
FATM/FFM > 0.62184/24276.0%241/75432.01.49 (1.07-2.08)0.018
TFATM ≥ 16.35151/24446.3348/74946.41.87 (1.39-2.51)< 0.001
TFFM ≤ 27.65 kg113/24446.3348/74946.40.99 (0.74-1.33)0.967
TFATM/TFFM > 59154/24463.11%338/74945.11.41 (1.05-1.89)0.024
HTN221/27480.4831/97585.30.72 (0.51-1.02)0.067
Smoking8/2692.9717/9701.71.72 (0.73-4.03)0.208

FBS: Fasting blood sugar, BMI: Body mass index, FATM: Fat mass, FFM: Fat free mass, TFATM: Truncal fat mass, TFFM: Truncal fat free mass, HTN: hypertension

Table 3

Association of migraine and biochemical, anthropometric, and other measured factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis

BPOdds ratio95% CI

LowerUpper
Step 1Total cholesterol0.0450.9211.040.432.54
LDL-cholesterol-0.2520.6100.770.292.05
FBS0.3470.2881.410.752.68
Waist-to-hip ratio-0.1950.4410.820.501.35
FFM0.5700.1271.770.853.68
TFFM0.1750.4741.190.741.92
Step 2LDL-cholesterol-0.2220.5700.800.371.72
FBS0.3500.2821.420.752.68
Waist-to-hip ratio-0.1940.4430.820.501.35
FFM0.5770.1161.780.873.65
TFFM0.1740.4751.190.741.92
Step 3FBS0.3490.2821.420.752.68
Waist-to-hip ratio-0.2000.4270.820.501.34
FFM0.4630.1321.590.872.90
TFFM0.1710.4821.190.741.91
Step 4FBS0.3660.2581.440.762.72
Waist-to-hip ratio-0.1790.4750.840.511.37
FFM0.5620.0391.751.032.99
Step 5FBS0.3470.2821.410.752.66
FFM0.4290.0301.531.042.26
Step 6FFM0.634< 0.0011.881.672.12

FBS: Fasting blood sugar, BMI: Body mass index, FATM: Fat mass, FFM: Fat free mass, TFATM: Truncal fat mass, TFFM: Truncal fat free mass, HTN: hypertension

Association between migraine and biochemical, anthropometric, and other measured factors FBS: Fasting blood sugar, BMI: Body mass index, FATM: Fat mass, FFM: Fat free mass, TFATM: Truncal fat mass, TFFM: Truncal fat free mass, HTN: hypertension Association of migraine and biochemical, anthropometric, and other measured factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis FBS: Fasting blood sugar, BMI: Body mass index, FATM: Fat mass, FFM: Fat free mass, TFATM: Truncal fat mass, TFFM: Truncal fat free mass, HTN: hypertension

Discussion

In healthy overweight and obese individuals, elevation of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, FBS, waist-to-hip ratio, FFM, and TFFM increased the risk of migraine. After adjustment, the only significant association was between migraine and FFM. At the tissue level, FFM focuses on skeletal muscle, bone, blood, and visceral organ. The main component is skeletal muscle.[6] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the relationship between body composition parameters and migraine was assessed. An energy-restricted diet in combination with aerobic and anaerobic exercises would reduce fat mass while preserving fat free mass.[7] Therefore, restricting calorie intake and having an exercise program can reduce the risk of migraine in overweight an obese women. Previously, large population based studies assessed the association between physical activity level and migraine. In line with our hypothesis about the effect of exercise on the risk of migraine, Milde-busch et al. in a study on 1260 adolescents concluded that there is a 3.4 fold risk of migraine in physically inactive individuals. They included migraine and tension-type headache, using the criteria of International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition (ICHD-II).[8] In the HUNT study, among a subset of 5847 adolescents, physical inactive, smoker, and overweight individuals were 1.4 fold more likely to suffer from recurrent headache (tension-type or migraine). Subjects with low physical activity level had 1.2 times greater risk for recurrent headache. In another large cross-sectional study of 46648 individuals, inactivity was associated with higher incidence of self-reported non-migraine and migraine headache.[9] Moreover, some studies have assessed the therapeutic effects of aerobic exercise programs in migraineurs. Varkey et al. study has focused on increasing oxygen uptake and it was well tolerated.[10] Evidences suggest that aerobic exercise increase beta endorphin secretion which may subsequently increase pain threshold. Exercise is also associated with an increase in fat free mass. According to our findings, lower level of fat free mass was associated with increased risk of migraine. Therefore, physical activity can also reduce migraine risk by increasing fat free mass. A number of limitations should be considered in interpretation of our results. First of all, our study population was limited to overweight and obese middle-aged women. Therefore, the results may not be expanded to other age-groups, men, or normal weight individuals. We chose overweight and obese women because they are more prone to migraine than men and normal weight subjects. Second, since this study was cross-sectional, although we adjusted the odd ratios for the most potential confounders, we cannot exclude the other possible confounding factors. Third, we just evaluated the association between body composition parameters and migraine. The association between body composition and other types of headache is remained to be evaluated.

Conclusion

All together, the findings of the current study suggested that the decrease in fat free mass may increase the risk of migraine in overweight and obese individuals. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of fat free mass changes on migraine severity.
  9 in total

1.  Associations of diet and lifestyle with headache in high-school students: results from a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Astrid Milde-Busch; Astrid Blaschek; Ingo Borggräfe; Florian Heinen; Andreas Straube; Rüdiger von Kries
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.887

2.  Effect of an energy-restrictive diet, with or without exercise, on lean tissue mass, resting metabolic rate, cardiovascular risk factors, and bone in overweight postmenopausal women.

Authors:  O L Svendsen; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Body mass index, migraine, migraine frequency and migraine features in women.

Authors:  A C Winter; K Berger; J E Buring; T Kurth
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  A study to evaluate the feasibility of an aerobic exercise program in patients with migraine.

Authors:  Emma Varkey; Asa Cider; Jane Carlsson; Mattias Linde
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 5.887

5.  Body mass index and episodic headaches: a population-based study.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; Amy Tsang; Elizabeth Loder; Daniel Serrano; Michael L Reed; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-08

6.  First nationwide survey of prevalence of overweight, underweight, and abdominal obesity in Iranian adults.

Authors:  Mohsen Janghorbani; Masoud Amini; Walter C Willett; Mohammad Mehdi Gouya; Alireza Delavari; Siamak Alikhani; Alireza Mahdavi
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Headache prevention outcome and body mass index.

Authors:  M E Bigal; M Gironda; S J Tepper; M Feleppa; A M Rapoport; F D Sheftell; R B Lipton
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  Physical activity and headache: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT).

Authors:  E Varkey; K Hagen; J-A Zwart; M Linde
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  Metabolic syndrome and migraine.

Authors:  Amit Sachdev; Michael J Marmura
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Fasting lipid and lipoproteins concentrations in pregnant women with a history of migraine.

Authors:  Bizu Gelaye; Gloria T Larrabure-Torrealva; Chunfang Qiu; Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez; B Lee Peterlin; Sixto E Sanchez; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.887

2.  Bariatric Surgery Promising in Migraine Control: a Controlled Trial on Weight Loss and Its Effect on Migraine Headache.

Authors:  Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi; Maryam Abolhasani; Zeinab Ghorbani; Solmaz Sadre-Jahani; Zahra Alizadeh; Mohammad Talebpour; Alipasha Meysamie; Mansoureh Togha
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Migraines: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jerry T Dang; Jeremy K H Lee; Janice Y Kung; Noah J Switzer; Shahzeer Karmali; Daniel W Birch
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The serum level of inflammatory markers in chronic and episodic migraine: a case-control study.

Authors:  Fahimeh Martami; Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi; Mansoureh Togha; Zeinab Ghorbani; Maryam Seifishahpar; Atoosa Saidpour
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  Migraine and body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Patrizia Ripa; Francesca Pistoia; Diana Degan; Cindy Tiseo; Antonio Carolei; Simona Sacco
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Association of Helicobacter pylori antibodies and severity of migraine attack.

Authors:  Behnaz Ansari; Keivan Basiri; Rokhsareh Meamar; Ahmad Chitsaz; Shahrzad Nematollahi
Journal:  Iran J Neurol       Date:  2015-07-06

Review 7.  The Role of Diet and Nutrition in Migraine Triggers and Treatment: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nada Ahmad Hindiyeh; Niushen Zhang; Mallory Farrar; Pixy Banerjee; Louise Lombard; Sheena K Aurora
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 8.  Association of diet and headache.

Authors:  Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi; Zeinab Ghorbani; Paolo Martelletti; Christian Lampl; Mansoureh Togha
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 7.277

9.  Migraine and type 2 diabetes; is there any association?

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadat Haghighi; Masoud Rahmanian; Nasim Namiranian; Seyed Masoud Arzaghi; Farzane Dehghan; Fahime Chavoshzade; Fariba Sepehri
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2016-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.