| Literature DB >> 24250428 |
Abolfazl Movafagh1, Hassan Heydary, Seyed Abdolreza Mortazavi-Tabatabaei, Eznollah Azargashb.
Abstract
Phytohemagglutinin (PHA) is a lectin, obtained from the red kidney bean that binds to the membranes of T-cells and stimulates metabolic activity, cell division, etc. The object of this research was the comparison between self made PHA (Indigenous) and imported commercial one, following conventional and High Resolution Cell Synchronization technique (HRCS) .From each blood sample of healthy individual donor replicate cell culture with two different PHA (self-made and commercial imported) with same concentration were cultured simultaneously. For culture cells, 3-5 × 106(6) cells were cultured in 4 mL medium( RPMI 1640 supplemented with 15 per cent heat inactivated fetal bovine serum, 0.1 mL Phytohemagglutinin was added and kept at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The processing of mitotic division from 48 h and 72 h cultures was performed according to the standard and High Resolution Cell Synchronization technique. Cytogenetic studies were performed in 100 normal healthy blood donor individuals. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS (version 16, Inc.USA) software.Our results indicate that the preparation of fresh Phytohemagglutinin at the time of cell division and cell culture procedure reveals satisfactory score. The overall frequency of mitotic index in our study was better when compared with commercial imported Phytohemagglutinin (p < 0.001).The significant differences in the results may be due to fresh preparation. However, cost effective, easy and nearest approach of this indigenous product and high demand for this product among health care services can be considered.Entities:
Keywords: Application; Cell culture; Indigenous; Mitotic index; Phytohemagglutinin (PHA)
Year: 2011 PMID: 24250428 PMCID: PMC3813071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1Comparison between ConA and PHA-L
Figure 6Comparison between ConA and PHA-L
Figure 7Comparison as a whole of mitotic index between EXP A and EXP B (p < 0.001).
Figure 8Comparison of mitotic index for both Exp A and B together with two different culture period (p < 0.001
Figure 9Comparison of mitotic index between EXP A and EXP B with 72 h culture period (p < 0.001).
Figure 10Comparison of mitotic index between EXP A and exp B with 48 h culture period (p = 0.510).