| Literature DB >> 24250259 |
Pakamon Pintana1, Nakorn Tippayawong.
Abstract
Thermal behaviors and combustion kinetics of Thai lignite with different SO₃-free CaO contents were investigated. Nonisothermal thermogravimetric method was carried out under oxygen environment at heating rates of 10, 30, and 50°C min⁻¹ from ambient up to 1300°C. Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) methods were adopted to estimate the apparent activation energy (E) for the thermal decomposition of these coals. Different thermal degradation behaviors were observed in lignites with low (14%) and high (42%) CaO content. Activation energy of the lignite combustion was found to vary with the conversion fraction. In comparison with the KAS method, higher E values were obtained by the FWO method for all conversions considered. High CaO lignite was observed to have higher activation energy than the low CaO coal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24250259 PMCID: PMC3821929 DOI: 10.1155/2013/216975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Analysis results of Thai lignite samples.
| Characterization | Low CaO lignite | High CaO lignite |
|---|---|---|
| Proximate analysis (% w/w, as-received basis) | ||
| Moisture content | 35.1 | 39.6 |
| Volatile matter | 28.2 | 27.6 |
| Fixed carbon | 25.8 | 20.9 |
| Ash | 10.9 | 11.8 |
| Ultimate analysis (% w/w, dry basis) | ||
| C | 58.5 | 58.4 |
| H | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| N | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| O | 12.9 | 12.6 |
| S | 5.5 | 3.3 |
| Heating value (MJ/kg, dry basis) | ||
| HHV | 23.7 | 22.6 |
| LHV | 23.1 | 22.0 |
| Ash compositions | ||
| Na2O | 1.9 | 0.7 |
| MgO | 4.2 | 3.4 |
| Al2O3 | 13.4 | 1.4 |
| SiO2 | 21.1 | 16.6 |
| P2O5 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| SO3 | 17.4 | 33.4 |
| K2O | 1.3 | 0.2 |
| TiO2 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Fe2O3 | 28.9 | 15.9 |
| MnO2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| CaO | 11.4 | 28.2 |
| CaO (SO3-free basis) | 13.8 | 42.3 |
| Base-to-acid ratio | 1.37 | 2.68 |
Figure 1Thermal degradation profiles of low and high CaO samples at different heating rates.
Figure 2Isoconversional determination of the kinetic parameters based on the FWO method for (a) low CaO and (b) high CaO lignite samples.
Figure 3Isoconversional determination of the kinetic parameters based on the KAS method for (a) low CaO and (b) high CaO lignite samples.
Figure 4Dependency of apparent activation energy (E) on conversion (x), determined using the FWO and KAS methods for low and high CaO lignite samples.
Calculated combustion kinetic parameters.
| Method | Material |
| Average | s.d. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWO | Low CaO lignite |
| 58.40 | 6.35 | |
|
| 1st | 1.30 × 10−4 | 1.04 × 10−4 | ||
| 2nd | 2.13 × 10−4 | 1.64 × 10−4 | |||
| 3rd | 3.98 × 10−4 | 3.08 × 10−4 | |||
| High CaO lignite |
| 88.55 | 46.87 | ||
|
| 1st | 1.58 × 10−5 | 1.37 × 10−5 | ||
| 2nd | 2.03 × 10−5 | 1.72 × 10−5 | |||
| 3rd | 4.72 × 10−5 | 3.86 × 10−5 | |||
|
| |||||
| KAS | Low CaO lignite |
| 47.25 | 6.30 | |
|
| 1st | 1.70 × 10−2 | 1.03 × 10−2 | ||
| 2nd | 2.84 × 10−2 | 1.78 × 10−2 | |||
| 3rd | 5.51 × 10−2 | 4.18 × 10−2 | |||
| High CaO lignite |
| 74.35 | 42.21 | ||
|
| 1st | 1.88 × 10−2 | 2.85 × 10−2 | ||
| 2nd | 4.14 × 10−2 | 7.04 × 10−2 | |||
| 3rd | 1.10 × 10−1 | 2.11 × 10−1 | |||