| Literature DB >> 24249586 |
Joanna Suliburska1, Zbigniew Krejpcio, Halina Staniek, Ewelina Król, Pawel Bogdanski, Justyna Kupsz, Iwona Hertig.
Abstract
The long-term use of hypotensive drugs may cause side effects, including impaired glucose metabolism and mineral status. This study tested the hypothesis that some hypotensive drugs can affect tissular chromium levels and indices of glucose metabolic and antioxidant potential in rats. The experiment was performed on 40 male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), which were assigned to five groups: control (C), with perindopril (PR), with metoprolol (MT), with indapamide (ID), and with amlodipine (AM). All rats were provided ad libitum standard diet (with or without drugs) and distilled water for 45 days. Glucose and insulin levels, along with total antioxidant status (TAS) and concentrations of TNF-alpha and C-reactive protein, were assayed in serum. Chromium concentrations in the liver and kidney were determined using the flame atomic absorption spectrometry method. Detailed statistical analysis was performed using Statistica for Windows 10.0 (StatSoft, Poland). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc Tukey test, was used to compare the data between groups. Treatment with indapamide and amlodipine resulted in significantly higher chromium concentrations in the liver and kidney (AM) of the rats, compared with the control group. A markedly higher concentration of glucose was found in the ID group. Treatment with amlodipine significantly increased TAS levels in serum and decreased TNF-alpha concentration in serum of the rats. A significant positive correlation between chromium concentration in tissues and serum TAS level was observed, as was a significant negative correlation between chromium concentration in the kidneys, and TNF-alpha and glucose levels in serum. In conclusion, the administration of amlodipine may lead to an increase in chromium accumulation in the internal organs, which is associated with increased antioxidant status and suppression of the inflammatory response of cells in SHRs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24249586 PMCID: PMC3895216 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-013-9864-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 3.738
The composition of the diet
| Ingredient | Amount | Ingredient | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total energy (kcal/kg) | 2,844 | Biotin (μg/kg) | 60 |
| Total protein (% of energy) | 24 | Nicotinic acid (mg/kg) | 36 |
| Total fat (% of energy) | 11 | Pantothenic acid (mg/kg) | 21 |
| Total carbohydrate (% of energy) | 65 | Choline chloride (mg/kg) | 600 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 19 | Calcium (g/kg) | 9 |
| Fat (g/100 g) | 4 | Phosphor (g/kg) | 7 |
| Fiber (g/100 g) | 6 | Magnesium (g/kg) | 3 |
| Vitamin A (IU) | 1,500 | Sodium (g/kg) | 2 |
| Vitamin D3 (IU) | 600 | Potassium (g/kg) | 1 |
| Vitamin B1 (mg/kg) | 18 | Iron (mg/kg) | 165 |
| Vitamin B2 (mg/kg) | 12 | Manganium (mg/kg) | 75 |
| Vitamin B6 (mg/kg) | 9 | Zinc (mg/kg) | 70 |
| Vitamin B12 (μg/kg) | 24 | Copper (mg/kg) | 13 |
| Vitamin C (mg/kg) | 36 | Iodium (mg/kg) | 1.5 |
| Vitamin K3 (mg/kg) | 3 | Selenium (mg/kg) | 0.6 |
| Vitamin E (mg/kg) | 75 | Cobalt (mg/kg) | 0.3 |
| Folic acid (mg/kg) | 2 | Chromium (mg/kg) | 4.5 |
Daily diet and chromium intake in rats
| Groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C ( | PR ( | MT ( | ID ( | AM ( | |
| Diet (g/day/rat) | 23.5 ± 1.1 | 24.2 ± 1.0 | 24.0 ± 0.9 | 24.3 ± 0.9 | 23.9 ± 1.1 |
| Cr (mg/day/rat) | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.03 |
C control group, PR group with perindopril, MT group with metoprolol, ID group with indapamide, AM group with amlodipine, n number of rats in the group
Biochemical parameters in rats
| Parameter | Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C ( | PR ( | MT ( | ID ( | AM ( | |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | 6.1 ± 0.3a | 6.2 ± 0.5a | 5.9 ± 0.6a | 6.8 ± 0.3b | 6.1 ± 0.3a |
| Insulin (pmol/l) | 132.4 ± 41.0 | 137.5 ± 48.2 | 122.0 ± 36.6 | 108.1 ±21.2 | 134.6 ±48.3 |
| HOMA | 5.01 ± 1.43 | 5.60 ± 2.31 | 4.32 ± 1.47 | 4.47 ± 0.85 | 5.15 ± 1.77 |
| TAS (mmol/l) | 1.16 ± 0.32a | 1.12 ± 0.20a | 0.96 ± 0.17a | 1.59 ± 0.24a | 2.99 ± 0.26b |
| TNF-alpha (ng/ml) | 2.24 ± 0.25b | 2.17 ± 0.24b | 1.97 ± 0.18b | 2.31 ± 0.16b | 1.05 ± 0.09a |
| CRP (ng/ml) | 84.9 ± 5.26 | 80.5 ± 7.74 | 79.8 ± 7.2 | 82.3 ± 11.6 | 76.3 ± 12.1 |
C control group, PR group with perindopril, MT group with metoprolol, ID group with indapamide, AM group with amlodipine, HOMA homeostasis model of assessment—insulin resistance index, n number of rats in the group
a,bSignificant differences between five groups (ANOVA test, p < 0.05)
Chromium concentration in tissues of rats (ng/g d.w.)
| Tissue | Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C ( | PR ( | MT ( | ID ( | AM ( | |
| Liver | 603.5 ± 86.3a | 612.0 ± 96.1a | 613.5 ± 95.5a | 812.8 ± 117.8b | 881.7 ± 126.7b |
| Kidney | 369.3 ± 38.0a | 489.2 ± 98.6a | 468.2 ± 105.9a | 414.6 ± 94.9a | 673.9 ± 92.6b |
C control group, PR group with perindopril, MT group with metoprolol, ID group with indapamide, AM group with amlodipine, n number of rats in group
a,bSignificant differences between five groups (ANOVA test, p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Correlation (Pearson’s r) between TAS level in serum and chromium concentration in liver of rats
Fig. 2Correlation (Pearson’s r) between TAS level in serum and chromium concentration in kidney of rats
Fig. 3Correlation (Pearson’s r) between TNF-alpha level in serum and chromium concentration in kidney of rats
Fig. 4Correlation (Pearson’s r) between glucose level in serum and chromium concentration in kidney of rats