Literature DB >> 24249044

Comparison of the Mahalanobis distance and Pearson's χ² statistic as measures of similarity of isotope patterns.

Fatemeh Zamanzad Ghavidel1, Jürgen Claesen, Tomasz Burzykowski, Dirk Valkenborg.   

Abstract

To extract a genuine peptide signal from a mass spectrum, an observed series of peaks at a particular mass can be compared with the isotope distribution expected for a peptide of that mass. To decide whether the observed series of peaks is similar to the isotope distribution, a similarity measure is needed. In this short communication, we investigate whether the Mahalanobis distance could be an alternative measure for the commonly employed Pearson's χ(2) statistic. We evaluate the performance of the two measures by using a controlled MALDI-TOF experiment. The results indicate that Pearson's χ(2) statistic has better discriminatory performance than the Mahalanobis distance and is a more robust measure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24249044     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0773-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  19 in total

1.  Modeling peptide mass fingerprinting data using the atomic composition of peptides.

Authors:  S Gay; P A Binz; D F Hochstrasser; R D Appel
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Automatic analysis of hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectra of peptides and proteins using calculations of isotopic distributions.

Authors:  M Palmblad; J Buijs; P Håkansson
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Using a Poisson approximation to predict the isotopic distribution of sulphur-containing peptides in a peptide-centric proteomic approach.

Authors:  Dirk Valkenborg; Pryseley Assam; Grégoire Thomas; Luc Krols; Koen Kas; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions.

Authors:  M W Senko; S C Beu; F W McLaffertycor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.

Authors:  Qingzhong Liu; Andrew H Sung; Mengyu Qiao; Zhongxue Chen; Jack Y Yang; Mary Qu Yang; Xudong Huang; Youping Deng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Comparison of database search strategies for high precursor mass accuracy MS/MS data.

Authors:  Edward J Hsieh; Michael R Hoopmann; Brendan MacLean; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data.

Authors:  Melissa M Matzke; Katrina M Waters; Thomas O Metz; Jon M Jacobs; Amy C Sims; Ralph S Baric; Joel G Pounds; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  NITPICK: peak identification for mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Bernhard Y Renard; Marc Kirchner; Hanno Steen; Judith A J Steen; Fred A Hamprecht
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Statistical quality assessment and outlier detection for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry experiments.

Authors:  Ole Schulz-Trieglaff; Egidijus Machtejevas; Knut Reinert; Hartmut Schlüter; Joachim Thiemann; Klaus Unger
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.522

10.  Integrated multi-level quality control for proteomic profiling studies using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David A Cairns; David N Perkins; Anthea J Stanley; Douglas Thompson; Jennifer H Barrett; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  CLOUD: a non-parametric detection test for microbiome outliers.

Authors:  Emmanuel Montassier; Gabriel A Al-Ghalith; Benjamin Hillmann; Kimberly Viskocil; Amanda J Kabage; Christopher E McKinlay; Michael J Sadowsky; Alexander Khoruts; Dan Knights
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 14.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.