Literature DB >> 24248870

Sheep food repellents: Efficacy of various products, habituation, and social facilitation.

C Arnould1, J P Signoret.   

Abstract

The study of food repulsion in ungulates is of practical importance for controlling browsing damage to forest trees and agricultural crops. Experiments with domestic sheep assessed the repulsive value of three natural and two synthetic products, using a food-choice situation. Animals were individually presented with two troughs, each containing 30 g of maize, one treated with a chemical product, and the other a control. The odor of domestic dog feces appeared to be highly repulsive, as none of the treated food was eaten, whereas 3 g ±9 and 6 g ±10 were eaten, respectively, of food treated with fetal fluids from sheep and odor of pig feces. Synthetic odors of lion feces and a commercial deer repellent were less efficient as repellents with 11 g ±13 and 14 g ±15 of food eaten, respectively. Habituation to three of the repellents was tested for a minimum of seven successive days. With dog feces, no habituation to the odor was observed. On the contrary, significant habituation (P < 0.05) was observed as early as the third trial for sheep fetal fluids and the fourth trial for the commercial repellent. To test for the effects of social facilitation, groups of four sheep including no, one, or two anosmic animals were presented with food treated with the odor of dog feces. No social facilitation was observed as none of the intact sheep ate any of the food, although the anosmic animals actively ate it throughout the test. In individual food choice tests, the odor of dog feces appeared to be an especially efficient repellent when compared with the other natural or synthetic products. Such repulsion was nearly complete, and neither habituation nor social facilitation could be observed.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 24248870     DOI: 10.1007/BF00993691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  10 in total

1.  Effects of predator fecal odors on feed selection by sheep and cattle.

Authors:  J A Pfister; D Müller-Schwarze; D F Balph
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Anal gland secretion of the red fox.

Authors:  E S Albone; M W Fox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  [Emotional behavior of rats; influence of the odor of a predator and a non-predator].

Authors:  E Vernet-Maury; J Le Magnen; J Chanel
Journal:  C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D       Date:  1968-07-15

4.  Attraction and repulsion by amniotic fluids and their olfactory control in the ewe around parturition.

Authors:  F Levy; P Poindron; P Le Neindre
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1983-11

5.  Aversive responses of white-tailed deer,Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urines.

Authors:  R K Swihart; J J Pignatello; M J Mattina
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Influence of mustelid scent-gland compounds on suppression of feeding by snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; D R Crump
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : I. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; L O Nordstrom; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Structure-activity relationship of stress-inducing odorants in the rat.

Authors:  E Vernet-Maury; E H Polak; A Demael
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : II. Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; L O Nordstrom; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : III. Montane and meadow voles (Microtus montanus andMicrotus pennsylvanicus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; D R Crump; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.626

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents.

Authors:  Michael H Parsons; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Responses of beaver (Castor canadensis Kuhl) to predator chemicals.

Authors:  A Engelhart; D Müller-Schwarze
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Effects of mongoose odors on rat capture success.

Authors:  M E Tobin; R M Engeman; R T Sugihara
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Carnivore fecal chemicals suppress feeding by Alpine goats (Capra hircus).

Authors:  P J Weldon; D P Graham; L P Mears
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Wild Norway Rats Do Not Avoid Predator Scents When Collecting Food in a Familiar Habitat: A Field Study.

Authors:  Rafał Stryjek; Berenika Mioduszewska; Ewelina Spaltabaka-Gędek; Grzegorz R Juszczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.