Literature DB >> 24248376

Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory.

Tad W Patzek1, Frank Male, Michael Marder.   

Abstract

Natural gas from tight shale formations will provide the United States with a major source of energy over the next several decades. Estimates of gas production from these formations have mainly relied on formulas designed for wells with a different geometry. We consider the simplest model of gas production consistent with the basic physics and geometry of the extraction process. In principle, solutions of the model depend upon many parameters, but in practice and within a given gas field, all but two can be fixed at typical values, leading to a nonlinear diffusion problem we solve exactly with a scaling curve. The scaling curve production rate declines as 1 over the square root of time early on, and it later declines exponentially. This simple model provides a surprisingly accurate description of gas extraction from 8,294 wells in the United States' oldest shale play, the Barnett Shale. There is good agreement with the scaling theory for 2,057 horizontal wells in which production started to decline exponentially in less than 10 y. The remaining 6,237 horizontal wells in our analysis are too young for us to predict when exponential decline will set in, but the model can nevertheless be used to establish lower and upper bounds on well lifetime. Finally, we obtain upper and lower bounds on the gas that will be produced by the wells in our sample, individually and in total. The estimated ultimate recovery from our sample of 8,294 wells is between 10 and 20 trillion standard cubic feet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy resources; fracking; hydrofracturing; scaling laws; shale gas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24248376      PMCID: PMC3856843          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313380110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  A mathematical model of fluid and gas flow in nanoporous media.

Authors:  Paulo J M Monteiro; Chris H Rycroft; Grigory Isaakovich Barenblatt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution.

Authors:  J David Hughes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Forecasting long-term gas production from shale.

Authors:  Luis Cueto-Felgueroso; Ruben Juanes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Natural gas: The fracking fallacy.

Authors:  Mason Inman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Subcontinuum mass transport of condensed hydrocarbons in nanoporous media.

Authors:  Kerstin Falk; Benoit Coasne; Roland Pellenq; Franz-Josef Ulm; Lydéric Bocquet
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Activated desorption at heterogeneous interfaces and long-time kinetics of hydrocarbon recovery from nanoporous media.

Authors:  Thomas Lee; Lydéric Bocquet; Benoit Coasne
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Mesoscale structure, mechanics, and transport properties of source rocks' organic pore networks.

Authors:  Jeremie Berthonneau; Amaël Obliger; Pierre-Louis Valdenaire; Olivier Grauby; Daniel Ferry; Damien Chaudanson; Pierre Levitz; Jae Jin Kim; Franz-Josef Ulm; Roland J-M Pellenq
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A machine learning framework for rapid forecasting and history matching in unconventional reservoirs.

Authors:  Shriram Srinivasan; Daniel O'Malley; Maruti K Mudunuru; Matthew R Sweeney; Jeffrey D Hyman; Satish Karra; Luke Frash; J William Carey; Michael R Gross; George D Guthrie; Timothy Carr; Liwei Li; Hari S Viswanathan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Using Nanoindentation to Characterize the Mechanical and Creep Properties of Shale: Load and Loading Strain Rate Effects.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wang; Chao Yang; Yuke Liu; Yun Li; Yongqiang Xiong
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-14

8.  A multi-fractured well performance model for unconventional reservoirs.

Authors:  Shaibu Mohammed; Yaw Akyampon Boakye-Ansah; Ebenezer Gyamfi-Yeboah; Kwamena Opoku Duartey; Warden Ivan Nyamekye
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-01

9.  Universal Stochastic Multiscale Image Fusion: An Example Application for Shale Rock.

Authors:  Kirill M Gerke; Marina V Karsanina; Dirk Mallants
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.