Literature DB >> 24247839

Epistasis in maize (Zea mays L.) : 2. Genetic effects in crosses among early flint and dent inbred lines determined by three methods.

A E Melchinger1, H H Geiger, F W Schnell.   

Abstract

Three flint and three dent maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines, their possible F1 crosses, F2 and backcross progenies, and all possible three-way crosses were evaluated in a three-year experiment for yield, ear moisture, and plant height. The purpose was to estimate genetic parameters in European breeding materials from (i) generation means analysis, (ii) diallel analysis of generation means, and (iii) analysis of F1 and three-way cross hybrids. Method (i) was based on the F∞-metric model and methods (ii) and (iii) on the Eberhart-Gardner (1966) genetic model; both models extended for heterotic maternal effects.Differences among generation means for yield and plant height were mainly attributable to dominance effects. Epistatic effects were significantly different from zero in a few crosses and considerably reduced heterosis in both traits. Additive x additive and domiance x dominance effects for yield were consistently positive and negative, respectively. Significant maternal effects were established to the advantage of generations with a heterozygous seed parent. In the diallel analysis, mean squares for dominance effects were greater than for additive effects for yield and plant height but smaller for ear moisture. Though significant for yield and plant height, epistatic variation was small compared to additive and dominance variation. Estimates of additive x additive epistasis for yield were significantly negative in 11 of 15 crosses, suggesting that advantageous gene combinations in the lines had been disrupted by recombination in the segregating generations. The analysis of hybrids supported the above findings regarding the analysis of variance. However, the estimates of additive x additive epistasis for yield were considerably smaller and only minimally correlated with those from the diallel analysis. Use of noninbred materials as opposed to materials with different levels of inbreeding is considered the main reason for the discrepancies in the results.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 24247839     DOI: 10.1007/BF00266997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  7 in total

1.  The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. II.

Authors:  B I HAYMAN
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1960       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  A Model for the Study of Quantitative Inheritance.

Authors:  V L Anderson; O Kempthorne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Random and fixed effects in plant genetics.

Authors:  C C Cockerham
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Epistasis in Maize (ZEA MAYS L.). II: Comparison of Selected with Unselected Populations.

Authors:  C W Stuber; R H Moll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sex-linked and maternal effects in the Eberhart-Gardner general genetics model.

Authors:  E A Carbonell; W E Nyquist; A E Bell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations.

Authors:  C O Gardner; A S Eberhart
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Effect of recombination in the parent populations on the means and combining ability variances in hybrid populations of maize ( Zea mays L.).

Authors:  A E Melchinger; H H Geiger; H F Utz; F W Schnell
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 5.699

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Epistasis in monkeyflowers.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Non-additive gene effects in populations under different methods of selection.

Authors:  E A Carbonell; A E Bell; J J Frey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds.

Authors:  A E Melchinger; M Lee; K R Lamkey; A R Hallauer; W L Woodman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Unraveling epistasis with triple testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines.

Authors:  Jochen C Reif; Barbara Kusterer; Hans-Peter Piepho; Rhonda C Meyer; Thomas Altmann; Chris C Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Barbara Kusterer; Jasmina Muminovic; H Friedrich Utz; Hans-Peter Piepho; Susanne Barth; Martin Heckenberger; Rhonda C Meyer; Thomas Altmann; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Recombination and genetic variance among maize doubled haploids induced from F1 and F2 plants.

Authors:  Joshua A Sleper; Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genetic Dissection of Epistatic Interactions Contributing Grain Yield Variability in Rice under Drought.

Authors:  Ratna Rani Majumder; Nitika Sandhu; Shailesh Yadav; Margaret Catolos; Ma Teresa Sta Cruz; Paul Cornelio Maturan; Lutful Hassan; Mohammad Amir Hossain; Arvind Kumar
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  A Low Resolution Epistasis Mapping Approach To Identify Chromosome Arm Interactions in Allohexaploid Wheat.

Authors:  Nicholas Santantonio; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark Sorrells
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.