Literature DB >> 24247610

Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya : 2. Why do they differ from each other so extensively?

J R Witcombe1, P J Murphy.   

Abstract

Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya differ significantly from each other in a multivariate way (Murphy and Witcombe 1986). Two hypotheses which could account for this phenomenon are (1) that the caryopsis covering gene (or a gene closely linked with it) exerts a wide-ranging pleiotropic effect, and (2) that the covered and naked types have evolved to differ with respect to the alleles fixed at many loci. Experimental evidence is presented which supports the latter, an explanation which has implications for our understanding of barley phylogeny and evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 24247610     DOI: 10.1007/BF00263272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  1 in total

1.  Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya : 1. Evidence of multivariate differences between the two types.

Authors:  P J Murphy; J R Witcombe
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.699

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Geographic distribution of alleles at the Ga2 locus for segregation distortion in barley.

Authors:  T Konishi; Y Yano; K Abe
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genetic relatedness and population differentiation of Himalayan hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces inferred with SSRs.

Authors:  Madhav Pandey; Carola Wagner; Wolfgang Friedt; Frank Ordon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Covered and naked barleys from the Himalaya : 1. Evidence of multivariate differences between the two types.

Authors:  P J Murphy; J R Witcombe
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.699

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.