Literature DB >> 2424756

Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to histone 2B. Localization of epitopes and analysis of binding to chromatin.

W G Whitfield, G Fellows, B M Turner.   

Abstract

Two mouse monoclonal IgM antibodies have been isolated which bind to histone 2B (H2B), as shown by protein blotting and immunostaining and by solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA). One of these (HBC-7) was specific for H2B by both techniques whereas the other (2F8) cross-reacted with histone H1 by RIA. Both antibodies failed to recognize H2B limit peptides from trypsin-digested chromatin and did not bind to Drosophila H2B, which differs extensively from vertebrate H2B only in the N-terminal region. These findings indicate that both antibodies recognize epitopes within the trypsin-sensitive, N-terminal region comprising residues 1-20. Binding of antibody HBC-7 was inhibited by in vitro ADP-ribosylation of H2B at glutamic acid residue 2. This strongly suggests that the epitope recognized by HBC-7 is located at the N-terminus of H2B, probably between residues 1 and 8. We have used solid-phase radioimmunoassay to investigate factors which influence the accessibility of this epitope in chromatin. Removal of H1 ('stripping') from high-molecular-mass chromatin had no effect on HBC-7 binding, nor was any difference observed between binding to stripped chromatin and to 146-base-pair (bp) core particles derived from it by nuclease digestion. These results suggest that accessibility of the N-terminal region of H2B is not influenced by H1 itself or by the size or conformation of linker DNA. In contrast, binding of antibody HBC-7 to 146-bp core particles derived from unstripped chromatin was reduced by up to 70%. Binding was restored by exposure of these core particles to the conditions used for stripping. Analysis of the protein content of core particle preparations from stripped and unstripped chromatin suggests that these findings may be attributable to redistribution of non-histone proteins during nuclease digestion. Pre-treatment of high-molecular-mass chromatin or 146-bp core particles with the intercalating dye ethidium bromide resulted in a severalfold increase in binding of HBC-7. The major changes in nucleosome morphology induced by ethidium are therefore accompanied by an increase in accessibility of the N-terminal region of H2B, possibly as a direct result of changes in the spatial relationship between H2B and core DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2424756     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09697.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  6 in total

1.  Antibodies to defined histone epitopes reveal variations in chromatin conformation and underacetylation of centric heterochromatin in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  P Jeppesen; A Mitchell; B Turner; P Perry
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Cooperation of structural proteins during late events in the life cycle of polyomavirus.

Authors:  J Forstová; N Krauzewicz; S Wallace; A J Street; S M Dilworth; S Beard; B E Griffin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Individual variation in the isotype profile of anti-histone autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  G Fellows; N Gittoes; D G Scott; J S Coppock; A Wainwright; M Goodall; B M Turner
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Antibody labelling and flow cytometric analysis of metaphase chromosomes reveals two discrete structural forms.

Authors:  B M Turner; A Keohane
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Sister chromatid differentiation in 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine-substituted chromosomes: a study with DNA-specific ligands and monoclonal antibody to histone H2B.

Authors:  M Ribas; J R Korenberg; D Peretti; G Pichiri; J C Stockert; J Gosalvez; R Mezzanotte
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  High mobility group 1 protein is not stably associated with the chromosomes of somatic cells.

Authors:  L Falciola; F Spada; S Calogero; G Langst; R Voit; I Grummt; M E Bianchi
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-04-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.