Literature DB >> 24247227

Anesthesia information management system-based near real-time decision support to manage intraoperative hypotension and hypertension.

Bala G Nair1, Mayumi Horibe, Shu-Fang Newman, Wei-Ying Wu, Gene N Peterson, Howard A Schwid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension and hypertension are associated with adverse clinical outcomes and morbidity. Clinical decision support mediated through an anesthesia information management system (AIMS) has been shown to improve quality of care. We hypothesized that an AIMS-based clinical decision support system could be used to improve management of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension.
METHODS: A near real-time AIMS-based decision support module, Smart Anesthesia Manager (SAM), was used to detect selected scenarios contributing to hypotension and hypertension. Specifically, hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg) with a concurrent high concentration (>1.25 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) of inhaled drug and hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg) with concurrent phenylephrine infusion were detected, and anesthesia providers were notified via "pop-up" computer screen messages. AIMS data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the effect of SAM notification messages on hypotensive and hypertensive episodes.
RESULTS: For anesthetic cases 12 months before (N = 16913) and after (N = 17132) institution of SAM messages, the median duration of hypotensive episodes with concurrent high MAC decreased with notifications (Mann Whitney rank sum test, P = 0.031). However, the reduction in the median duration of hypertensive episodes with concurrent phenylephrine infusion was not significant (P = 0.47). The frequency of prolonged episodes that lasted >6 minutes (sampling period of SAM), represented in terms of the number of cases with episodes per 100 surgical cases (or percentage occurrence), declined with notifications for both hypotension with >1.25 MAC inhaled drug episodes (δ = -0.26% [confidence interval, -0.38% to -0.11%], P < 0.001) and hypertension with phenylephrine infusion episodes (δ = -0.92% [confidence interval, -1.79% to -0.04%], P = 0.035). For hypotensive events, the anesthesia providers reduced the inhaled drug concentrations to <1.25 MAC 81% of the time with notifications compared with 59% without notifications (P = 0.003). For hypertensive episodes, although the anesthesia providers' reduction or discontinuation of the phenylephrine infusion increased from 22% to 37% (P = 0.030) with notification messages, the overall response was less consistent than the response to hypotensive episodes.
CONCLUSIONS: With automatic acquisition of arterial blood pressure and inhaled drug concentration variables in an AIMS, near real-time notification was effective in reducing the duration and frequency of hypotension with concurrent >1.25 MAC inhaled drug episodes. However, since phenylephrine infusion is manually documented in an AIMS, the impact of notification messages was less pronounced in reducing episodes of hypertension with concurrent phenylephrine infusion. Automated data capture and a higher frequency of data acquisition in an AIMS can improve the effectiveness of an intraoperative clinical decision support system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24247227     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  14 in total

1.  Intraoperative blood glucose management: impact of a real-time decision support system on adherence to institutional protocol.

Authors:  Bala G Nair; Katherine Grunzweig; Gene N Peterson; Mayumi Horibe; Moni B Neradilek; Shu-Fang Newman; Gail Van Norman; Howard A Schwid; Wei Hao; Irl B Hirsch; E Patchen Dellinger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  A systematic review of near real-time and point-of-care clinical decision support in anesthesia information management systems.

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Jonathan M Tan; Arul M Lingappan; Jorge A Gálvez; Sherry E Morgan; Michael A Krall
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Automated systems for perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Sean Coeckelenbergh; Cedrick Zaouter; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson; Joseph Rinehart; Jacques Duranteau; Philippe Van der Linden; Alexandre Joosten
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Development and Feasibility of a Real-Time Clinical Decision Support System for Traumatic Brain Injury Anesthesia Care.

Authors:  Taniga Kiatchai; Ashley A Colletti; Vivian H Lyons; Rosemary M Grant; Monica S Vavilala; Bala G Nair
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Vital Recorder-a free research tool for automatic recording of high-resolution time-synchronised physiological data from multiple anaesthesia devices.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Chul-Woo Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  What is "normal" intraoperative blood pressure and do deviations from it really affect postoperative outcome?

Authors:  David Li; Christian Bohringer; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  Prediction of hemodynamic fluctuations after induction of general anesthesia using propofol in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sho Kawasaki; Chikako Kiyohara; Shoji Tokunaga; Sumio Hoka
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 8.  Obstetric anaesthesia practice: Dashboard as a dynamic audit tool.

Authors:  Sunil T Pandya; Kausalya Chakravarthy; Aparna Vemareddy
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-11

Review 9.  Terminology, communication, and information systems in nonoperating room anaesthesia in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Christina A Jelly; Holly B Ende; Robert E Freundlich
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.733

10.  Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Translation (ACT-FAST)-a feasibility study protocol.

Authors:  Teresa M Murray-Torres; Frances Wallace; Mara Bollini; Michael S Avidan; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.