Literature DB >> 24246932

Population-based assessment of the number of lymph nodes removed in the treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Yao Zhu1, Cheng-Yuan Gu, Ding-Wei Ye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, as a performance measure of lymph node dissection (LND), in a population-based database.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988-2009) were used to identify 393 patients who underwent regional LND for penile cancer. The study cohort was divided into two groups: limited LND (<8 LNs removed) and extensive LND (≥8 LNs removed). Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with extensive LND. Log-rank tests were used to evaluate the associations between LN evaluation and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: The median number of removed LNs was 15, and 28% of patients underwent limited LND. The prevalence of extensive LND decreased gradually with increasing age: from 81% in men younger than 50 years to 65% in men aged 70 years or older. In multivariate analysis, only age retained an independent association with extensive LND (odds ratio = 0.98, p = 0.01). Log-rank test showed better cause-specific survival in patients receiving extensive LND (p = 0.006). The difference in survival was statistically significant in the subgroup of node-positive penile cancer patients (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: An inadequate number of LN retrieval was observed in a considerable proportion of penile cancer patients, especially in the elderly population. 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24246932     DOI: 10.1159/000354401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

1.  Treatment Trends and Outcomes for Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Cancer of the Penis.

Authors:  Shreyas S Joshi; Elizabeth Handorf; David Strauss; Andres F Correa; Alexander Kutikov; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Marc C Smaldone; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study.

Authors:  Jamil Ghahhari; Michele Marchioni; Philippe E Spiess; Juan J Chipollini; Peter Nyirády; Judith Varga; Pasquale Ditonno; Stefano Boccasile; Giulia Primiceri; Cosimo De Nunzio; Giorgia Tema; Andrea Tubaro; Alessandro Veccia; Alessandro Antonelli; Gennaro Musi; Ottavio De Cobelli; Andrea Conti; Stefano Puliatti; Salvatore Micali; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; José Quesada Olarte; Erico Diogenes; Marcos Venicio Alves Lima; Andrew Tracey; Georgi Guruli; Riccardo Autorino; Petros Sountoulides; Roman Sosnowski; Luigi Schips; Luca Cindolo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

3.  Development of a New Classification Method for Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Lymph Node Density and Standard Pathological Risk Factors: The ND Staging System.

Authors:  Zai-Shang Li; Kai Yao; Peng Chen; Bin Wang; Qi-Wu Mi; Jie-Ping Chen; Yong-Hong Li; Chuang-Zhong Deng; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Zi-Ke Qin; Fang-Jian Zhou; Hui Han
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Lymph node density predicts recurrence and death after inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.

Authors:  Mark W Ball; Zeyad R Schwen; Joan S Ko; Alexa Meyer; George J Netto; Arthur L Burnett; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-01-04

5.  Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Pan Gao; Tianle Zhu; Jingjing Gao; Hu Li; Xi Liu; Xiansheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Partial penectomy or total penectomy for T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis?

Authors:  Qi-Le Zheng; Yu-Peng Wu; Zi-Ping Zhang; Ning Xu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.