R J D Prestwich1, M T W Teo2, A Gilbert3, G Williams4, K E Dyker2, M Sen2. 1. Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: Robin.Prestwich@leedsth.nhs.uk. 2. Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK. 3. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 4. Dietetic Department, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: Two contrasting approaches of a prophylactic gastrostomy or a nasogastric tube as needed are widely used to support patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. The influence of the type and timing of enteral feeding tube support upon long-term swallowing is uncertain. This study analysed the patients' perspective on long-term swallowing, comparing two groups of patients who received chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer managed with the two approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) was posted to 63 consecutive patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy between January 2007 and June 2009, who had not required therapeutic enteral feeding before treatment and who were disease free on follow-up at least 2 years after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 56/63 patients completed questionnaires; 43 had been managed with a prophylactic gastrostomy and 13 with a policy of nasogastric tube as needed. There were no significant differences in all global, emotional, physical or functional domains of the MDADI according to enteral feeding strategy. Diet at 6 months after treatment was significantly correlated with better MDADI scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the choice of a prophylactic gastrostomy or nasogastric tube as needed did not seem to influence long-term swallowing function.
AIMS: Two contrasting approaches of a prophylactic gastrostomy or a nasogastric tube as needed are widely used to support patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. The influence of the type and timing of enteral feeding tube support upon long-term swallowing is uncertain. This study analysed the patients' perspective on long-term swallowing, comparing two groups of patients who received chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer managed with the two approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) was posted to 63 consecutive patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy between January 2007 and June 2009, who had not required therapeutic enteral feeding before treatment and who were disease free on follow-up at least 2 years after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 56/63 patients completed questionnaires; 43 had been managed with a prophylactic gastrostomy and 13 with a policy of nasogastric tube as needed. There were no significant differences in all global, emotional, physical or functional domains of the MDADI according to enteral feeding strategy. Diet at 6 months after treatment was significantly correlated with better MDADI scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the choice of a prophylactic gastrostomy or nasogastric tube as needed did not seem to influence long-term swallowing function.
Authors: Stephanie M Shaw; Heather Flowers; Brian O'Sullivan; Andrew Hope; Louis W C Liu; Rosemary Martino Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Ronald Maggiore; Zachary S Zumsteg; Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Kelly M Trevino; Ajeet Gajra; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Joel B Epstein; Stewart M Bond; Ira Parker; Julie A Kish; Barbara A Murphy; Noam A VanderWalde Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ryan P Goepfert; Jan S Lewin; Martha P Barrow; C David Fuller; Stephen Y Lai; Juhee Song; Brian P Hobbs; G Brandon Gunn; Beth M Beadle; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; Merrill S Kies; Vali A Papadimitrakopoulou; David L Schwartz; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Mai Takahashi; Michael Hwang; Krysztof Misiukiewicz; Vishal Gupta; Brett A Miles; Richard Bakst; Eric Genden; Isaiah Selkridge; John Botzler; Vruti Virani; Erin Moshier; Marcelo R Bonomi; Marshall R Posner Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Anna C H Willemsen; Ann Hoeben; Roy I Lalisang; Ardy Van Helvoort; Frederik W R Wesseling; Frank Hoebers; Laura W J Baijens; Annemie M W J Schols Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Molly A Smith; Ashley E Culver-Cochran; Emmalee R Adelman; Garrett W Rhyasen; Averil Ma; Maria E Figueroa; Daniel T Starczynowski Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 8.786