Literature DB >> 24245052

Three-dimensional kinematic comparison of treadmill and overground running.

Jonathan Sinclair1, Jim Richards, Paul J Taylor, Christopher J Edmundson, Darrell Brooks, Sarah J Hobbs.   

Abstract

The treadmill is an attractive device for the investigation of human locomotion, yet the extent to which lower limb kinematics differ from overground running remains a controversial topic. This study aimed to provide an extensive three-dimensional kinematic comparison of the lower extremities during overground and treadmill running. Twelve participants ran at 4.0 m/s (+/- 5%) in both treadmill and overground conditions. Angular kinematic parameters of the lower extremities during the stance phase were collected at 250 Hz using an eight-camera motion analysis system. Hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics were quantified in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes, and contrasted using paired t-tests. Of the analysed parameters hip flexion at footstrike and ankle excursion to peak angle were found to be significantly reduced during treadmill running by 12 degrees (p = 0.001) and 6.6 degrees (p = 0.010), respectively. Treadmill running was found to be associated with significantly greater peak ankle eversion (by 6.3 degrees, p = 0.006). It was concluded that the mechanics of treadmill running cannot be generalized to overground running.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24245052     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2012.759614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  22 in total

1.  The Biomechanics of Standing Start and Initial Acceleration: Reliability of the Key Determining Kinematics.

Authors:  Regan J Standing; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Clinical Indoor Running Gait Analysis May Not Approximate Outdoor Running Gait Based on Novel Drone Technology.

Authors:  Lindsay Lafferty; John Wawrzyniak; Morgan Chambers; Todd Pagliarulo; Arthur Berg; Nour Hawila; Matthew Silvis
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 3.  An Evidence-Based Videotaped Running Biomechanics Analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Digital filtering of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics: an assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan Sinclair; Paul John Taylor; Sarah Jane Hobbs
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 5.  Setting standards for medically-based running analysis.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Daniel C Herman; Leslie Lear-Barnes; Robert Barnes; Cong Chen; Scott Greenberg; Kevin R Vincent
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  A Multifactorial Approach to Overuse Running Injuries: A 1-Year Prospective Study.

Authors:  Sara C Winter; Susan Gordon; Sara M Brice; Daniel Lindsay; Sue Barrs
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over-ground and treadmill conditions.

Authors:  Christian J Barton; Simon L Kappel; Peter Ahrendt; Ole Simonsen; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  How joint torques affect hamstring injury risk in sprinting swing-stance transition.

Authors:  Yuliang Sun; Shutao Wei; Yunjian Zhong; Weijie Fu; Li Li; Yu Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Modular Control of Treadmill vs Overground Running.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Leonardo Gizzi; Shahin Ketabi; Dario Farina; Uwe Gustav Kersting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Action Sport Cameras as an Instrument to Perform a 3D Underwater Motion Analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo R D Bernardina; Pietro Cerveri; Ricardo M L Barros; João C B Marins; Amanda P Silvatti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.