Literature DB >> 24244905

The Janus face of cyclophosphamide: A sterile inflammatory response that potentiates cancer immunotherapy.

Giovanna Ziccheddu1, Enrico Proietti, Federica Moschella.   

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide, within well-defined therapeutic regimens, increases the antineoplastic effects of immunotherapy. We have recently identified multiple factors and mechanisms that underlie the paradoxical synergy between these two treatment modalities. In particular, we found that cyclophosphamide stimulates anticancer immune responses upon the perception by the immune system of inflammatory danger signals associated with the death of leukocytes, via p53 and type I interferon-related mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Type 1 interferon; alkylating agents; cellular response to anticancer drugs; chemoimmunotherapy; gene expression profiling; immunomodulation; immunotherapy; sterile inflammation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24244905      PMCID: PMC3825725          DOI: 10.4161/onci.25789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Although cyclophosphamide was traditionally regarded as an immunosuppressant, owing to its robust cytotoxicity for rapidly proliferating cells (including leukocytes), several studies have demonstrated that this drug can also exert immunostimulatory properties, which can be taken advantage of to enhance the efficacy of anticancer immunotherapy. The mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie this paradoxical phenomenon are related to the ability of cyclophosphamide to (1) establish a myelo-leukodepleted state, providing space for adoptively transferred immune effector cells, (2) suppress the activity of regulatory T cells, (3) induce homeostatic proliferation among B and T cells, (4) facilitate tumor infiltration by lymphocytes and (5) trigger a cytokine storm during the recovery phase that follows leukodepletion. Studies in mice have shown that type I interferon (IFN) is an important mediator of the immunomodulatory effects of cyclophosphamide, accounting for the expansion of memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as of dendritic cells (DCs). Genomic and proteomic analyses have demonstrated that cyclophosphamide alters the expression of ~1000 genes in the bone marrow and spleen, as well as the levels of a high number of cytokines/chemokines in the plasma and bone marrow of tumor-bearing mice. However, in spite of a multiplicity of studies (reviewed in ref. 1), the specific mechanisms whereby cyclophosphamide exerts so many immunomodulatory effects are still matter of debate. Moreover, these mechanisms have most often been investigated in murine models. In order to identify the mediators and mechanisms through which cyclophosphamide potentiate anticancer immune responses in humans, we analyzed the systemic effects of a single administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide (3–4 g/m2) in patients affected by hematologic malignancies. In particular, we analyzed the transcriptional profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before and at different time points (1, 2 and 5 d) after treatment. The transcriptional modulation induced by cyclophosphamide turned out to be broad (890 distinct genes were differentially expressed), rapid (it manifested 1–2 d post-treatment) and transient (most transcripts altered by cyclophosphamide returned to pre-treatment levels by day 5). We then functionally classified the genes that were differentially expressed in response to cyclophosphamide by gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses. Among downregulated genes, the most significantly enriched GO biological processes terms included “metabolic,” “cell cycle,” “ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis” and “biosynthetic” processes, as expected for a cytotoxic treatment. Remarkably, the most significantly enriched biological process among the genes that were upregulated by cyclophosphamide was “immune response,” along with “response to stress” and “cell death.” In addition, upregulated genes were associated with the pathways “lysosome,” “p53 signaling,” “inflammation mediated by chemokine and cytokine signaling” and “B cell activation.” “Immune response”-related transcripts included many coding for scavenger receptors (CD68, MARCO, CD163L1 SCARB2) and C1R, encoding a component of the supramolecular complex C1, which is involved in the recognition of stressed and dying cells. Along similar lines, the levels of transcripts coding for factors implicated in antigen processing and presentation (CIITA, CD68, CTSC, CTSL1, CTSZ, GLA, GAA, TPP1, NEU1, SLC11A, LAMP-2) or receptors for inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL8R, IL10R, IL17R) were increased. Also genes encoding receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily, such as TNFRSF1A (best known as TNFR1), which triggers either inflammation or apoptosis upon TNFα binding, TNFSF13B (BAFF), which plays a critical role in B-cell expansion/migration, and TNFRSF4 (OX40), which is important for antigen-specific T-cell expansion/survival, were upregulated. Of note, several among cyclophosphamide-induced genes (OAS1, CXCL10, TNFSF13B, IFITM2, IFI6, IRF5, IRF7, STAT2, UBE2L6, UNC93B1, ISG20L1, TYK2) are known to be transactivated in response to type I IFN, and are indicative of a type I IFN signature in different settings. Alongside, the administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide altered the expression of numerous genes associated with stress, cell death, DNA damage repair, apoptosis, autophagy and chemotherapy resistance, including genes whose products are related to the “p53 signaling pathway” (CDKN1A, CCND3, BAX, BBC3, BID, DDB2, SESN2). Since type I IFN signaling can stimulate p53 responses to stress, and vice versa, p53 can activate the IFN signal transduction pathway, it is tempting to speculate that p53 and type I IFN might cooperate not only to trigger cyclophosphamide-mediated apoptosis, but also to potently stimulate innate immune cells and promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, most likely via the upregulation of IRF7 and IRF5. The administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide also increased the circulating levels of type I IFN-induced cytokines (CXCL10, TNFSF13B) and inflammatory mediators (CCL2, IL-8). The latter have been shown by others to be secreted in response to apoptotic bodies in the course of sterile inflammatory responses. Of interest, cytofluorometric analyses revealed that high-dose cyclophosphamide induces a state of leukodepletion affecting both monocytes and lymphocytes, yet does so in a rather selective manner, with specific cell subpopulations undergoing differential quantitative alterations. Indeed, while we found total monocytes to be depleted, we observed increased percentages of a specific monocyte subset (namely, CD14+CD16+ cells) that is characterized by macrophage-like morphology, robust endocytic activity, elevated antigen presentation capacity and intense secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, cyclophosphamide appeared to elevate the percentage of MARCO- and IL8R-expressing monocytes as that of MARCO-expressing circulating DCs, while increasing the expression levels of HLA-DR on both these types of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Of note, following the administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide, along with the expected lymphodepletion, we observed the expansion of lymphocytes expressing the activation marker CD69, the co-stimulatory molecule OX40 and IL8R. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the cyclophosphamide-induced death of leukocytes is perceived by surrounding cells as a danger signal and promote the establishment of a systemic sterile inflammatory response characterized by increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the expansion of activated APCs and lymphocytes (Fig. 1). Such a sterile inflammatory response may engender an immunogenic milieu that boosts the efficacy immunotherapeutic interventions. Furthermore, our data point to a critical role for type I IFN and p53 in the regulation of cyclophosphamide-induced sterile inflammation.

Figure 1. Sterile inflammatory response induced by cyclophosphamide. The administration of cyclophosphamide results in the death of highly proliferating cells (including lymphocytes and monocytes) along with the activation of the p53 signaling pathway and type I interferon (IFN)-regulated genes, favoring the elicitation of the innate immune responses. Dead cells indeed emit danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors on antigen presenting cells, such monocytes and dendritic cells (DCs). These DAMPs generally stimulate the phagocytosis of apoptotic corpses, exacerbate antigen presentation and promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to the homeostatic proliferation and activation of T cells.

Figure 1. Sterile inflammatory response induced by cyclophosphamide. The administration of cyclophosphamide results in the death of highly proliferating cells (including lymphocytes and monocytes) along with the activation of the p53 signaling pathway and type I interferon (IFN)-regulated genes, favoring the elicitation of the innate immune responses. Dead cells indeed emit danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors on antigen presenting cells, such monocytes and dendritic cells (DCs). These DAMPs generally stimulate the phagocytosis of apoptotic corpses, exacerbate antigen presentation and promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to the homeostatic proliferation and activation of T cells.
  10 in total

1.  Sterile inflammation of endothelial cell-derived apoptotic bodies is mediated by interleukin-1α.

Authors:  Yaël Berda-Haddad; Stéphane Robert; Paul Salers; Leila Zekraoui; Catherine Farnarier; Charles A Dinarello; Françoise Dignat-George; Gilles Kaplanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Exploitation of the propulsive force of chemotherapy for improving the response to cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Enrico Proietti; Federica Moschella; Imerio Capone; Filippo Belardelli
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Cyclophosphamide induces type I interferon and augments the number of CD44(hi) T lymphocytes in mice: implications for strategies of chemoimmunotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  G Schiavoni; F Mattei; T Di Pucchio; S M Santini; L Bracci; F Belardelli; E Proietti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Cyclophosphamide enhances the antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred immune cells through the induction of cytokine expression, B-cell and T-cell homeostatic proliferation, and specific tumor infiltration.

Authors:  Laura Bracci; Federica Moschella; Paola Sestili; Valentina La Sorsa; Mara Valentini; Irene Canini; Sara Baccarini; Sonia Maccari; Carlo Ramoni; Filippo Belardelli; Enrico Proietti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Unraveling cancer chemoimmunotherapy mechanisms by gene and protein expression profiling of responses to cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Federica Moschella; Mara Valentini; Eleonora Aricò; Iole Macchia; Paola Sestili; Maria Teresa D'Urso; Cristiano Alessandri; Filippo Belardelli; Enrico Proietti
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  The CD14+ CD16+ blood monocytes: their role in infection and inflammation.

Authors:  Loems Ziegler-Heitbrock
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 7.  Interferon-α as antiviral and antitumor vaccine adjuvants: mechanisms of action and response signature.

Authors:  Eleonora Aricò; Filippo Belardelli
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  Recovery from cyclophosphamide-induced lymphopenia results in expansion of immature dendritic cells which can mediate enhanced prime-boost vaccination antitumor responses in vivo when stimulated with the TLR3 agonist poly(I:C).

Authors:  Mohamed L Salem; C Marcela Díaz-Montero; Amir A Al-Khami; Sabry A El-Naggar; Osama Naga; Alberto J Montero; Ahmed Khafagy; David J Cole
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Cyclophosphamide induces a type I interferon-associated sterile inflammatory response signature in cancer patients' blood cells: implications for cancer chemoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Federica Moschella; Giovanni Fernando Torelli; Mara Valentini; Francesca Urbani; Carla Buccione; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Fiammetta Natalino; Filippo Belardelli; Robin Foà; Enrico Proietti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Transcriptional role of p53 in interferon-mediated antiviral immunity.

Authors:  César Muñoz-Fontela; Salvador Macip; Luis Martínez-Sobrido; Lauren Brown; Joseph Ashour; Adolfo García-Sastre; Sam W Lee; Stuart A Aaronson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Trial Watch: Radioimmunotherapy for oncological indications.

Authors:  Norma Bloy; Jonathan Pol; Gwenola Manic; Ilio Vitale; Alexander Eggermont; Jérôme Galon; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 2.  Trial watch - inhibiting PARP enzymes for anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Antonella Sistigu; Gwenola Manic; Florine Obrist; Ilio Vitale
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 3.  Type I interferons in anticancer immunity.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Oliver Kepp; Mark J Smyth; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 4.  Immunology of tissue homeostasis, ovarian cancer growth and regression, and long lasting cancer immune prophylaxis - review of literature.

Authors:  Antonin Bukovsky
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 5.  Combinatorial strategies for the induction of immunogenic cell death.

Authors:  Lucillia Bezu; Ligia C Gomes-de-Silva; Heleen Dewitte; Karine Breckpot; Jitka Fucikova; Radek Spisek; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Trial Watch: Proteasomal inhibitors for anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Florine Obrist; Gwenola Manic; Guido Kroemer; Ilio Vitale; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2014-12-01

7.  Trial Watch: Toll-like receptor agonists in oncological indications.

Authors:  Fernando Aranda; Erika Vacchelli; Florine Obrist; Alexander Eggermont; Jérôme Galon; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Isabelle Cremer; Jan Henrik Ter Meulen; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 8.  Trial Watch:: Oncolytic viruses for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pol; Norma Bloy; Florine Obrist; Alexander Eggermont; Jérôme Galon; Isabelle Cremer; Philippe Erbs; Jean-Marc Limacher; Xavier Preville; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 8.110

9.  Clinical and Immunological Outcomes in High-Risk Resected Melanoma Patients Receiving Peptide-Based Vaccination and Interferon Alpha, With or Without Dacarbazine Preconditioning: A Phase II Study.

Authors:  Francesca Urbani; Virginia Ferraresi; Imerio Capone; Iole Macchia; Belinda Palermo; Carmen Nuzzo; Angela Torsello; Patrizio Pezzotti; Diana Giannarelli; Anna Fausta Pozzi; Mariano Santaquilani; Paolo Roazzi; Silvia Bastucci; Caterina Catricalà; Antonia La Malfa; Giuseppe Vercillo; Novella Gualtieri; Carla Buccione; Luciano Castiello; Francesco Cognetti; Paola Nisticò; Filippo Belardelli; Federica Moschella; Enrico Proietti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Towards a Systems Immunology Approach to Unravel Responses to Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Laura Bracci; Alessandra Fragale; Lucia Gabriele; Federica Moschella
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.