| Literature DB >> 24244827 |
Subash-Babu Pandurangan1, Antony Samy Paul, Ignacimuthu Savarimuthu, Alshatwi A Ali.
Abstract
In the present study, we aimed to analyze the antinociceptive, immunomodulatory and antipyretic activities of nymphayol were investigated in wistar rats and mice. Antinociceptive effect was evaluated by acetic acid induced writhing, formalin induced paw licking and hot-plate tests. Immunomodulatory activity was assessed by neutrophil adhesion test, humoral response to sheep red blood cells, delayed-type hypersensitivity, phagocytic activity and cyclophosphamide induced myelosuppression. Antipyretic activity was evaluated by yeast induced hyperthermia in rats. Nymphayol produced signifi cant (p<0.05) antinociceptive activity in acetic acid induced writhing response and late phase of the formalin induced paw licking response. Pre-treatment with nymphayol (50 mg/kg, oral) evoked a signifi cant increase in neutrophil adhesion to nylon fi bres. The augmentation of humoral immune response to sheep red blood cells by nymphayol (50 mg/kg) was evidenced by increase in antibody titres in rats. Oral administration of nymphayol (50 mg/kg) to rats potentiated the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction induced by sheep red blood cells. Treatment with nymphayol showed a signifi cant (p<0.05) reduction in pyrexia in rats. The results suggest that nymphayol possesses potent anti-nociceptive, immunomodulatory and antipyretic activities.Entities:
Keywords: Antinociceptive; Antipyretic; Immunomodulatory; Nymphaea stellata; Nymphayol; Writhing response
Year: 2013 PMID: 24244827 PMCID: PMC3825203 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2013.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.Chemiacal structure of a nymphayol.
Effects of nymphayol, indomethacin, morphine and naloxone on acetic acid-induced writhing response and formalin-induced paw licking in mice
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | Acetic acida | Formalin testb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Number of writhes | Early phase Licking time (s) | Late phase Licking time (s) | ||
|
| ||||
| Control | - | 56.01 ± 4.26 | 35.01 ± 2.67 | 37.01 ± 2.82 |
| Indomethacin | 10 | 12.00 ± 0.91 (78.5)* | 30.01 ± 2.28 (14.2)NS | 10.00 ± 0.76 (72.9)* |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 13.00 ± 0.99 (76.7)* | 28.00 ± 2.13 (20)NS | 14.00 ± 1.07 (62.1)* |
| Morphine | 05 | 3.00 ± 0.23 (94.6)* | 3.00 ± 0.23 (91.4)* | 3.00 ± 0.23 (91.8)* |
| Morphine+Naloxone | 05+02 | 57.01 ± 4.34 (-1.78)NS | 36.01 ± 2.74 (-2.8)NS | 37.01 ± 2.82 (0.00)† |
| Nymphayol+Naloxone | 50+02 | 14.00 ± 1.07 (75.0)*@ | 28.00 ± 2.13 (20)NS | 16.00 ± 1.22 (56.7)*@ |
| Indomethacin+Naloxone | 10+02 | 12.00 ± 0.91 (78.5)*@ | 29.00 ± 2.21 (17.4)NS | 10.00 ± 0.76 (72.9)*@ |
NS: non significant.
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
a,bValues in the parenthesis indicate writhing and paw licking inhibition percentage.
Comparison made between: *Control with all the groups. @Morphine+Naloxone with Nymphayol+Naloxone and Indomethacin+Naloxone.
†Morphine with Morphine+Naloxone. *@†p<0.05 significant from the control.
Effects of the nymphayol, morphine and naloxone on pain threshold of mice in the hot plate test
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | Mean latent time (sec.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Initial | After 30 min. | ||
|
| |||
| Control | - | 11.00 ± 0.84 | 11.00 ± 0.84 |
| Morphine | 05 | 10.00 ± 0.76NS | 36.00 ± 2.74* |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 11.00 ± 0.84NS | 11.00 ± 0.84NS |
| Morphine+Naloxone | 05+02 | 11.00 ± 0.84NS | 11.00 ± 0.84† |
| Nymphayol+Naloxone | 50+02 | 10.00 ± 0.76NS | 10.00 ± 0.76NS |
NS: non significant.
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
Comparison made between:*Control with all the groups. @Morphine+Naloxone with Nymphayol+Naloxone, †Morphine with Morphine+Naloxone, *@†p<0.05 significant from the control.
Effects of nymphayol on neutrophil adhesion test
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | Neutrophil index | Neutrophil adhesion (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| UB | FTB | |||
|
| ||||
| Control | - | 254.04 ± 19.34 | 226.04 ± 17.21 | 12.00 ± 0.91 |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 318.05 ± 24.22* | 251.04 ± 19.12* | 26.00 ± 1.98* |
| Levamisole | 2.5 | 328.05 ± 24.98* | 260.04 ± 19.80* | 29.00 ± 2.21* |
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
*p<0.05 significant from the control.
Effects of nymphayol on antibody titers in antigenically challenged rats
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | Haemagglutination antibody (HA) titres | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 1o HA titre | 2o HA titre | ||
|
| |||
| Control | - | 2.00 ± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.23 |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 5.30 ± 0.40* | 7.00 ± 0.53* |
| Levamisole | 2.5 | 5.00 ± 0.38* | 6.70 ± 0.51* |
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
*p<0.05 significant from the control.
Effects of nymphayol on foot pad reaction of antigenically challenged rats and phagocytic response
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | Paw thickness (mm) | Phagocytic index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 24 h | 48 h | |||
|
| ||||
| Control | - | 4.70 ± 0.36 | 3.88 ± 0.30 | 0.28 ± 0.02 |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 7.30 ± 0.56* | 6.80 ± 0.52* | 0.42 ± 0.03* |
| Levamisole | 2.5 | 7.00 ± 0.53* | 6.72 ± 0.51* | 0.49 ± 0.04* |
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
*p<0.05 signifi cant from the control.
Effects of nymphayol on blood cells of rats treated with cyclophosphamide for 10 days
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | RBC (×104/μl) | Haemoglobin (g/dl) | WBC (×102/μl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Control | - | 915.15 ± 69.69 | 10.75 ± 0.82 | 78.01 ± 5.94 |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 1,225.20 ± 93.29* | 15.24 ± 1.16* | 98.02 ± 7.46* |
| Levamisole | 2.5 | 1,237.21 ± 94.21* | 16.10 ± 1.23* | 106.02 ± 8.07* |
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
*p<0.05 significant from the control.
Effects of nymphayol on yeast- induced hyperthermia in rats
| Test samples | Treatment (mg/kg, p.o.) | Rectal temperature (℃) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Before yeast | 18 hr after yeast | Time after treatment (min) | |||||
|
| |||||||
| 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Control | - | 37.11 ± 2.83 | 39.19 ± 2.98 | 39.26 ± 2.99 | 39.23 ± 2.99 | 39.28 ± 2.99 | 39.11 ± 2.98 |
| Nymphayol | 50 | 37.11 ± 2.83 | 39.13 ± 2.98 | 38.55 ± 2.94 | 37.83 ± 2.88* | 37.51 ± 2.86* | 37.34 ± 2.84* |
| Paracetamol | 150 | 37.13 ± 2.83 | 39.27 ± 2.99 | 38.14 ± 2.90 | 37.52 ± 2.86* | 37.37 ± 2.85* | 37.11 ± 2.83* |
Data represent mean ± S.D. (standard deviation) (n=6).
*p<0.05 significant from the control.