| Literature DB >> 24244820 |
Hyun Jung Byun1, Kyung Jin Kang, Mi Kyung Park, Hye Ja Lee, June Hee Kang, Eun Ji Lee, You Ri Kim, Hyun Ji Kim, Young Woo Kim, Kyung Chae Jung, Soo Youl Kim, Chang Hoon Lee.
Abstract
Sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC) is significantly increased in the malicious ascites of tumor patients and induces perinuclear reorganization of keratin 8 (K8) filaments in PANC-1 cells. The reorganization contributes to the viscoelasticity of metastatic cancer cells resulting in increased migration. Recently, we reported that transglutaminase-2 (Tgase-2) is involved in SPC-induced K8 phosphorylation and reorganization. However, effects of Tgase-2 inhibitors on SPC-induced K8 phosphorylation and reorganization were not clearly studied. We found that ethacrynic acid (ECA) concentration-dependently inhibited Tgase-2. Therefore, we examined the effects of ECA on SPC-induced K8 phosphorylation and reorganization. ECA concentration-dependently suppressed the SPC-induced phosphorylation and perinuclear reorganization of K8. ECA also suppressed the SPC-induced migration and invasion. SPC induced JNK activation through Tgase-2 expression and ECA suppressed the activation and expression of JNK in PANC-1 cells. These results suggested that ECA might be useful to control Tgase-2 dependent metastasis of cancer cells such as pancreatic cancer and lung cancers.Entities:
Keywords: Ethacrynic acid; Invasion; Keratin-8 phosphorylation and reorganization; Migration; Sphingosylphosphorylcholine; Transglutaminase-2
Year: 2013 PMID: 24244820 PMCID: PMC3825196 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2013.066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.ECA induced Tgase-2 expression in Panc1 cells. (A) The structure of ethacrynic acid (B) Expression level of Tgase-2 in PANC-1 cell stimulated with the indicated concentration of ECA for 30 min. *p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fig. 2.ECA suppressed the SPC-induced K8 phosphorylation and reorganization. (A) Effect of ECA on SPC-induced K8 phosphorylation. The PANC-1 cells were treated with various amounts of ECA and with or without SPC (5 μM). (B) Confocal microscopic examination of the effect of ECA on SPC-induced K8 phosphorylation of PANC-1 cells. PANC-1 cell were treated with ECA (5 μM) 30 min and SPC (5 μM) for 1 hr. Immunostaining was performed using K8- Ser431 (green).
Fig. 3.ECA suppressed the SPC-induced migration and invasion. (A) Effect of ECA on SPC-induced migration of PANC-1 cell. (B) Microscopic images showing the effect of ECA on SPC-induced migration of PANC-1 cell. (C) Effect of ethacrynic acid on SPC-induced invasion of PANC-1 cell. (D) Microscopic images showing the effect of ethacrynic acid on SPC-induced invasion of PANC-1 cell. In (A), (B), (C) and (D), PANC-1 cell (5×104 cell per well) were treated with or without SPC (5 μM) and various concentration of ECA. *p or #p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fig. 4.Ethacrynic acid suppressed the SPC-induced JNK activation. (A) Effect of ECA on SPC-induced JNK activation in PANC-1 cell. The PANC-1 cell treated with or without SPC (5 μM) and various concentration of ECA. (B) Proposed effects of ECA on SPCinduced K8 phosphorylation via JNK activation.