Literature DB >> 24243897

MEAT SCIENCE AND MUSCLE BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM--anabolic implants and meat quality.

S K Duckett1, S L Pratt.   

Abstract

Anabolic implants are routinely used in the finishing phase of beef production to improve animal performance and feed efficiency. Implanting during the feedlot phase on average increases ADG 18%, feed intake 6%, feed efficiency 8%, carcass weight 5%, and ribeye area 4% compared with nonimplanted controls. Implants reduce the cost of beef production, which is important given current high feed costs and beef prices. In a 1996 review of 37 implant trials, the use of a combination (i.e., estrogenic and trenbolone acetate) implant increased returns by US$77/head compared with nonimplanted steers. If calculated using today's prices, a combination implant would increase returns by $163/head. However, concerns about potential negative effects of implants on marbling scores, quality grades, and tenderness exist. Changes in Warner-Bratzler shear force values of steaks from implanted steers are small (<0.5 kg) and appear related to an increase in initial tenderness, possibly due to hypertrophy of muscle fiber, instead of alterations in postmortem proteolysis. The increase in ribeye size observed with implanting may also reduce marbling scores through a dilution effect. The impact of anabolic implants on gene expression has shown that implanting downregulates expression of certain lipogenic genes (e.g., stearoyl-CoA desaturase, fatty acid synthetase, fatty acid elongase-6) in steers with low quality grades (Select-) but not in implanted steers with high quality grades (Choice-). Examination of the adipocyte's transcriptome has shown that 36 genes were differentially expressed due to implant treatment. More research is needed to further determine how anabolic implants alter lipogenic gene expression to address changes in marbling deposition with implant usage. Given our current high feed costs and cattle prices, anabolic implants are one of the most cost-effective technologies that can be used in beef production systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24243897     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Effects of hormonal growth promotants on beef quality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian J Lean; Helen M Golder; Natasha M Lees; Peter McGilchrist; Jose E P Santos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of nursing-calf implant timing on growth performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  M J Webb; A A Harty; R R Salverson; J J Kincheloe; S M S Zuelly; K R Underwood; M K Luebbe; K C Olson; A D Blair
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Fusarium toxin-contaminated maize in diets of growing bulls: effects on performance, slaughtering characteristics, and transfer into physiological liquids.

Authors:  Janine Winkler; Jens Gödde; Ulrich Meyer; Jana Frahm; Heiner Westendarp; Sven Dänicke
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.833

4.  Effect of varying trace mineral supplementation of steers with or without hormone implants on growth and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  Emma K Niedermayer; Olivia N Genther-Schroeder; Daniel D Loy; Stephanie L Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Cattle breed type and anabolic implants impact calpastatin expression and abundance of mRNA associated with protein turnover in the longissimus thoracis of feedlot steers.

Authors:  Caleb C Reichhardt; Chandler D Stafford; Jocelyn M Cuthbert; David S Dang; Laura A Motsinger; Mackenzie J Taylor; Reganne K Briggs; Tevan J Brady; Aaron J Thomas; Matthew D Garcia; Sulaiman K Matarneh; Kara J Thornton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  Metagenomic characterization of the effect of feed additives on the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Milton Thomas; Megan Webb; Sudeep Ghimire; Amanda Blair; Kenneth Olson; Gavin John Fenske; Alex Thomas Fonder; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Derek Brake; Joy Scaria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers.

Authors:  Rodrigo Arias; Cristobal Santa-Cruz; Alejandro Velásquez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Body Builder's Nightmare: Black Market Steroid Injection Gone Wrong: a Case Report.

Authors:  Or Friedman; Ehud Arad; Oded Ben Amotz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-09-29

9.  The Impact of Polyamine Precursors, Polyamines, and Steroid Hormones on Temporal Messenger RNA Abundance in Bovine Satellite Cells Induced to Differentiate.

Authors:  Caleb C Reichhardt; Lillian L Okamoto; Laura A Motsinger; Brian P Griffin; Gordon K Murdoch; Kara J Thornton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Anabolic Implants Varying in Hormone Type and Concentration Influence Performance, Feeding Behavior, Carcass Characteristics, Plasma Trace Mineral Concentrations, and Liver Trace Mineral Concentrations of Angus Sired Steers.

Authors:  Caleb C Reichhardt; Elizabeth M Messersmith; Tevan J Brady; Laura A Motsinger; Reganne K Briggs; Brett R Bowman; Stephanie L Hansen; Kara J Thornton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.